Loading…

Advances and challenges of life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas removal technologies to fight climate changes

Several greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs), also called negative emissions technologies (NET) have been proposed to help meet the Paris Climate Agreement targets. However, there are many uncertainties in the estimation of their effective greenhouse gas (GHG) removal potentials, caused by th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cleaner production 2020-01, Vol.244, p.118896, Article 118896
Main Authors: Goglio, P., Williams, A.G., Balta-Ozkan, N., Harris, N.R.P., Williamson, P., Huisingh, D., Zhang, Z., Tavoni, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-95f824fbf1598c3fff898e701220a1a4c71232addb940febf166e5e6fa51ef0f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-95f824fbf1598c3fff898e701220a1a4c71232addb940febf166e5e6fa51ef0f3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 118896
container_title Journal of cleaner production
container_volume 244
creator Goglio, P.
Williams, A.G.
Balta-Ozkan, N.
Harris, N.R.P.
Williamson, P.
Huisingh, D.
Zhang, Z.
Tavoni, M.
description Several greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs), also called negative emissions technologies (NET) have been proposed to help meet the Paris Climate Agreement targets. However, there are many uncertainties in the estimation of their effective greenhouse gas (GHG) removal potentials, caused by their different levels of technological development. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been proposed as one effective methodology to holistically assess the potential of different GGRT removal approaches but no common framework is currently available for benchmarking and policy development. In this article, challenges for LCA are reviewed and discussed together with some alternative approaches for assessment of GGRTs. In particular, GGRTs pose challenges with regards to the functional unit, the system boundary of the LCA assessment, and the timing of emissions. The need to account within LCA of GGRTs for broader implications which involve environmental impacts, economic, social and political drivers is highlighted. A set of recommendations for LCA of GGRTs are proposed for a better assessment of the GGRTs and better accounting of their carbon removal potentials to meet the targets established within the Paris Agreement. •LCA functional units of greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs) were proposed.•System boundaries are a GGRT challenge as they involve different production systems.•Emission time is key in the LCA of GGRT as removals do not happen at the same time.•LCA of GGRTs should address environmental, economic, social, political implications.•Recommendations to improve LCAs of GGRTs were proposed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118896
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_118896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959652619337667</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0959652619337667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-95f824fbf1598c3fff898e701220a1a4c71232addb940febf166e5e6fa51ef0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BCFHPbQm_UiTkyyLX7DgRc8hm07alGyzJLXgvzdl9-5pGGbmmZcHoXtKckooexryQTs4Bp8XhIqcUs4Fu0AryhuR0YazS7QiohYZqwt2jW5iHAihDWmqFZo37axGDRGrscW6V87B2KXWG-ysAax_ExurGCHGA4wTfthtN4_LuAsAY-9_IuBORRzg4Gfl8AS6H73znU2UyWNju37C2tmDmmD5sOBv0ZVRLsLdua7R9-vL1_Y9232-fWw3u0yXNZsyURteVGZvaC24Lo0xXHBoCC0KoqiqdEOLslBtuxcVMZD2GIMamFE1BUNMuUb1iauDjzGAkceQgoRfSYlc5MlBnuXJRZ48yUt3z6c7SOFmC0FGbSF5am0APcnW238If4GRfVs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advances and challenges of life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas removal technologies to fight climate changes</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Goglio, P. ; Williams, A.G. ; Balta-Ozkan, N. ; Harris, N.R.P. ; Williamson, P. ; Huisingh, D. ; Zhang, Z. ; Tavoni, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goglio, P. ; Williams, A.G. ; Balta-Ozkan, N. ; Harris, N.R.P. ; Williamson, P. ; Huisingh, D. ; Zhang, Z. ; Tavoni, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Several greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs), also called negative emissions technologies (NET) have been proposed to help meet the Paris Climate Agreement targets. However, there are many uncertainties in the estimation of their effective greenhouse gas (GHG) removal potentials, caused by their different levels of technological development. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been proposed as one effective methodology to holistically assess the potential of different GGRT removal approaches but no common framework is currently available for benchmarking and policy development. In this article, challenges for LCA are reviewed and discussed together with some alternative approaches for assessment of GGRTs. In particular, GGRTs pose challenges with regards to the functional unit, the system boundary of the LCA assessment, and the timing of emissions. The need to account within LCA of GGRTs for broader implications which involve environmental impacts, economic, social and political drivers is highlighted. A set of recommendations for LCA of GGRTs are proposed for a better assessment of the GGRTs and better accounting of their carbon removal potentials to meet the targets established within the Paris Agreement. •LCA functional units of greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs) were proposed.•System boundaries are a GGRT challenge as they involve different production systems.•Emission time is key in the LCA of GGRT as removals do not happen at the same time.•LCA of GGRTs should address environmental, economic, social, political implications.•Recommendations to improve LCAs of GGRTs were proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Environmental assessment ; Greenhouse gas removal technologies ; Life cycle assessment ; Methodology ; Negative emission technologies</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2020-01, Vol.244, p.118896, Article 118896</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-95f824fbf1598c3fff898e701220a1a4c71232addb940febf166e5e6fa51ef0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-95f824fbf1598c3fff898e701220a1a4c71232addb940febf166e5e6fa51ef0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goglio, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balta-Ozkan, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, N.R.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisingh, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavoni, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Advances and challenges of life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas removal technologies to fight climate changes</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><description>Several greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs), also called negative emissions technologies (NET) have been proposed to help meet the Paris Climate Agreement targets. However, there are many uncertainties in the estimation of their effective greenhouse gas (GHG) removal potentials, caused by their different levels of technological development. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been proposed as one effective methodology to holistically assess the potential of different GGRT removal approaches but no common framework is currently available for benchmarking and policy development. In this article, challenges for LCA are reviewed and discussed together with some alternative approaches for assessment of GGRTs. In particular, GGRTs pose challenges with regards to the functional unit, the system boundary of the LCA assessment, and the timing of emissions. The need to account within LCA of GGRTs for broader implications which involve environmental impacts, economic, social and political drivers is highlighted. A set of recommendations for LCA of GGRTs are proposed for a better assessment of the GGRTs and better accounting of their carbon removal potentials to meet the targets established within the Paris Agreement. •LCA functional units of greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs) were proposed.•System boundaries are a GGRT challenge as they involve different production systems.•Emission time is key in the LCA of GGRT as removals do not happen at the same time.•LCA of GGRTs should address environmental, economic, social, political implications.•Recommendations to improve LCAs of GGRTs were proposed.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Greenhouse gas removal technologies</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Negative emission technologies</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-BCFHPbQm_UiTkyyLX7DgRc8hm07alGyzJLXgvzdl9-5pGGbmmZcHoXtKckooexryQTs4Bp8XhIqcUs4Fu0AryhuR0YazS7QiohYZqwt2jW5iHAihDWmqFZo37axGDRGrscW6V87B2KXWG-ysAax_ExurGCHGA4wTfthtN4_LuAsAY-9_IuBORRzg4Gfl8AS6H73znU2UyWNju37C2tmDmmD5sOBv0ZVRLsLdua7R9-vL1_Y9232-fWw3u0yXNZsyURteVGZvaC24Lo0xXHBoCC0KoqiqdEOLslBtuxcVMZD2GIMamFE1BUNMuUb1iauDjzGAkceQgoRfSYlc5MlBnuXJRZ48yUt3z6c7SOFmC0FGbSF5am0APcnW238If4GRfVs</recordid><startdate>20200120</startdate><enddate>20200120</enddate><creator>Goglio, P.</creator><creator>Williams, A.G.</creator><creator>Balta-Ozkan, N.</creator><creator>Harris, N.R.P.</creator><creator>Williamson, P.</creator><creator>Huisingh, D.</creator><creator>Zhang, Z.</creator><creator>Tavoni, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200120</creationdate><title>Advances and challenges of life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas removal technologies to fight climate changes</title><author>Goglio, P. ; Williams, A.G. ; Balta-Ozkan, N. ; Harris, N.R.P. ; Williamson, P. ; Huisingh, D. ; Zhang, Z. ; Tavoni, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-95f824fbf1598c3fff898e701220a1a4c71232addb940febf166e5e6fa51ef0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Greenhouse gas removal technologies</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Negative emission technologies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goglio, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balta-Ozkan, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, N.R.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisingh, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavoni, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goglio, P.</au><au>Williams, A.G.</au><au>Balta-Ozkan, N.</au><au>Harris, N.R.P.</au><au>Williamson, P.</au><au>Huisingh, D.</au><au>Zhang, Z.</au><au>Tavoni, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advances and challenges of life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas removal technologies to fight climate changes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><date>2020-01-20</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>244</volume><spage>118896</spage><pages>118896-</pages><artnum>118896</artnum><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>Several greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs), also called negative emissions technologies (NET) have been proposed to help meet the Paris Climate Agreement targets. However, there are many uncertainties in the estimation of their effective greenhouse gas (GHG) removal potentials, caused by their different levels of technological development. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been proposed as one effective methodology to holistically assess the potential of different GGRT removal approaches but no common framework is currently available for benchmarking and policy development. In this article, challenges for LCA are reviewed and discussed together with some alternative approaches for assessment of GGRTs. In particular, GGRTs pose challenges with regards to the functional unit, the system boundary of the LCA assessment, and the timing of emissions. The need to account within LCA of GGRTs for broader implications which involve environmental impacts, economic, social and political drivers is highlighted. A set of recommendations for LCA of GGRTs are proposed for a better assessment of the GGRTs and better accounting of their carbon removal potentials to meet the targets established within the Paris Agreement. •LCA functional units of greenhouse gas removal technologies (GGRTs) were proposed.•System boundaries are a GGRT challenge as they involve different production systems.•Emission time is key in the LCA of GGRT as removals do not happen at the same time.•LCA of GGRTs should address environmental, economic, social, political implications.•Recommendations to improve LCAs of GGRTs were proposed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118896</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-6526
ispartof Journal of cleaner production, 2020-01, Vol.244, p.118896, Article 118896
issn 0959-6526
1879-1786
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_118896
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Climate change
Environmental assessment
Greenhouse gas removal technologies
Life cycle assessment
Methodology
Negative emission technologies
title Advances and challenges of life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas removal technologies to fight climate changes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A18%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advances%20and%20challenges%20of%20life%20cycle%20assessment%20(LCA)%20of%20greenhouse%20gas%20removal%20technologies%20to%20fight%20climate%20changes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Goglio,%20P.&rft.date=2020-01-20&rft.volume=244&rft.spage=118896&rft.pages=118896-&rft.artnum=118896&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118896&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0959652619337667%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-95f824fbf1598c3fff898e701220a1a4c71232addb940febf166e5e6fa51ef0f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true