Integrated assessment of carbon footprint, energy budget and net ecosystem economic efficiency from rice fields under different tillage modes in central China

• Published in: Journal of cleaner production 2021-05, Vol.295, p.126398, Article 126398
• Main Authors: Li, Shi-hao, Guo, Li-jin, Cao, Cou-gui, Li, Cheng-fang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural input; Economic benefit; Energy budget; Greenhouse gas emissions; Tillage practice
• ISSN: 0959-6526; 1879-1786
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126398

Currently, the effects of different tillage modes on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, carbon footprint (CF), energy budget and net ecosystem economic efficiency (NEEE) in rice fields remain unclear. In the present study, three tillage modes were tested, including rice conventional cultivation with intensive till (CT), conventional flat cultivation with no-till (FNT) and ridge cultivation with no-till (RNT) in Dafasi town, Wuxue city, Hubei province, China. This study for the first time evaluates the effects of RNT on agricultural GHG emissions, grain yield, CF, energy budget and NEEE. Compared with CT and FNT, RNT reduced the soil CH4 emissions by 29.5% and 9.9%, respectively. CT resulted in 15.8% and 23.1% lower total GHG emissions than FNT and RNT, respectively, due to lower soil CH4 emissions. Moreover, RNT significant decreased the CF by 35.7% and 18.2% relative to CT and FNT, respectively. The net energy, energy efficiency and energy productivity under RNT were 41.2%, 25.0% and 26.7% higher than those under CT, respectively, while the specific energy under RNT was 24.7% lower than that under CT. The NEEE under RNT was 1.66 and 1.20 folds of that under CT and FNT, respectively. In conclusion, this study recommends that RNT is an environmentally safe tillage mode for reducing GHG emissions and CF, and improving energy use efficiency and NEEE for rice production in China and similar agro-eco-regions elsewhere in the world.