Misconceptions about socially responsible investments

Socially responsible investment (SRI) suffers from a lack of investment from individuals and has for the past 30 years been driven mainly by professional investors. We underline that on average, individuals from the UK (n=560) and the US (n=472) have four misconceptions about SRI investments: (i) SR...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cleaner production 2022-11, Vol.373, p.133868, Article 133868
Main Authors: Meunier, Luc, Ohadi, Sima
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
CSR
ESG
Ethical investing
Financial literacy
Misconceptions
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Socially responsible investment (SRI) suffers from a lack of investment from individuals and has for the past 30 years been driven mainly by professional investors. We underline that on average, individuals from the UK (n=560) and the US (n=472) have four misconceptions about SRI investments: (i) SRI investments underperform classical ones (ii) SRI investments are shunned by “wall street investors” (iii) The idea of SRI emerged 5 years ago (iv) SRI requires higher management fees. We show that such misconceptions are linked to a lower propensity to have invested in SRI. We further show that in the US, misconceptions about SRI are related to lower financial literacy scores. We thus call for boosts in the form of education programs, in addition to nudges already proposed in the literature, in order to promote SRI.
ISSN:0959-6526
DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133868