Loading…

Achieving carbon neutrality in post COP26 in BRICS, MINT, and G7 economies: The role of financial development and governance indicators

Pledges and commitments from governments of wealthy nations were made at the COP26 Glasgow summit, thereby rejuvenating hope among nations to confront the climate change challenge. Thus, the study examines the complementarity of financial development and carbon emissions, while accounting for the co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cleaner production 2023-02, Vol.387, p.135853, Article 135853
Main Authors: Ofori, Elvis Kwame, Onifade, Stephen Taiwo, Ali, Ernest Baba, Alola, Andrew Adewale, Zhang, Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Pledges and commitments from governments of wealthy nations were made at the COP26 Glasgow summit, thereby rejuvenating hope among nations to confront the climate change challenge. Thus, the study examines the complementarity of financial development and carbon emissions, while accounting for the conditional influence of good governance under three disaggregated indicators – economic, institutional, and political governance for the BRICS, MINT, and the G7 economies. First, the study reveals that financial development depending on the adopted indicator has mixed effects on environmental pollution levels. Specifically, financial development triggers the highest pollution effect via domestic credit to the private sector compared to foreign direct investments, while financial development index reduces environmental pollution. Secondly, economic governance promotes environmental quality by reducing environmental pollution through quality regulation. Third, institutional governance through weaker rule of laws induces pollution, while the control of corruption antagonizes pollution levels. Furthermore, only the voice of accountability supports the pollution-mitigating effect of political governance. On a bloc-to-bloc comparative analysis, governance effectiveness promotes environmental pollution in all the three economic blocs albeit at different magnitudes while the voice of accountability exerts a significant desirable impact on pollution only in the G7 countries. Lastly, renewable energy and trade liberalization exerts a negative and positive influence on environmental degradation respectively. •Governance indicators drive environmental sustainability of BRICS, MINT, and G7 countries.•Financial development shows mixed effects on environmental degradation.•Economic governance enhances environment quality through regulatory quality.•Weaker rule of law worsens environmental quality while the control of corruption cushions pollution.•The voice of accountability improves environmental quality only in the G7.•Renewable energy promotes environmental quality while trade liberalization acts otherwise.
ISSN:0959-6526
1879-1786
DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135853