Loading…

Characterizing Acetabular Defects and Need of Major Reconstruction During Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Acetabular Protrusion- A Retrospective Study

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with acetabular protrusion can be challenging due to the lack of acetabular bone support. Some patients may require a major reconstructive procedure to aid in the fixation of the acetabular components. The purpose of the study was to characterize the type of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 2025-01, p.102847, Article 102847
Main Authors: Malhotra, Rajesh, Gautam, Deepak, George, Jaiben
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c967-1e5220bf2c5529ef52056e6db690bd9fbe6e3c4604d8faef00319152f076f1123
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102847
container_title Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
container_volume
creator Malhotra, Rajesh
Gautam, Deepak
George, Jaiben
description Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with acetabular protrusion can be challenging due to the lack of acetabular bone support. Some patients may require a major reconstructive procedure to aid in the fixation of the acetabular components. The purpose of the study was to characterize the type of acetabular defects in patients with protrusion and to assess the need for major reconstruction. This was a retrospective study of 125 THAs performed at a single tertiary center from 2010 to 2020 by a single surgeon in patients with acetabular protrusion. Demographics, operative details and radiographic details were recorded. THAs in which a structural graft, cage or augment were used for acetabular reconstruction were considered to have undergone a major reconstructive procedure and a classification system was proposed to identify patients requiring major reconstruction. 10 (8%) THAs required a major reconstruction in our cohort (2- augment, 8- structural allograft. There was significant difference in acetabular defects based on the etiology. Major reconstruction was more common when the diagnosis was sequalae of tuberculosis or post-traumatic arthritis. Simple cavitatory defects seldom required a major reconstruction while combined defects and medial wall deficiency increased the risk of requiring a major reconstruction. The severity of defects varied considerably with majority of patients having cavitatory type of defect which can be successfully managed without the need of any major reconstructive measures. A simple classification based on the type of defect and medial wall competency appeared to be useful in identifying patients who may need a major reconstructive procedure during THA.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102847
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcot_2024_102847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0976566224005162</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0976566224005162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c967-1e5220bf2c5529ef52056e6db690bd9fbe6e3c4604d8faef00319152f076f1123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhb0Aiar0Aqx8gRTbTZxGYhO1_EkFKujecpwxdRTiyHaKymE4K47KghWzGWmk9715D6ErSuaUUH7dzBtlw5wRlsYDW6b5GZqQIudJxjm7QDPvGxIn47Sgywn6Xu2lkyqAM1-me8elgiCroZUOr0GDCh7LrsbPADW2Gj_Jxjr8Csp2PrhBBWM7vB7cKN3ZIFv8YHpcurB3tm-lD0dsOryVwUAXUZ8m7P9abJ2NFB8hCS4jNjjr-2hqDoDfwlAfL9G5lq2H2e-eot3d7W71kGxe7h9X5SZRBc8TChljpNJMZRkrQGcs5gNeV7wgVV3oCjgsVMpJWi-1BE3IIqbPmCY515SyxRSxE1bFB7wDLXpnPqQ7CkrE2KtoxNirGHsVp16j6OYkgvjYwYATXsWYCmrjYgZRW_Of_AfmToaD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing Acetabular Defects and Need of Major Reconstruction During Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Acetabular Protrusion- A Retrospective Study</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Malhotra, Rajesh ; Gautam, Deepak ; George, Jaiben</creator><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Rajesh ; Gautam, Deepak ; George, Jaiben</creatorcontrib><description>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with acetabular protrusion can be challenging due to the lack of acetabular bone support. Some patients may require a major reconstructive procedure to aid in the fixation of the acetabular components. The purpose of the study was to characterize the type of acetabular defects in patients with protrusion and to assess the need for major reconstruction. This was a retrospective study of 125 THAs performed at a single tertiary center from 2010 to 2020 by a single surgeon in patients with acetabular protrusion. Demographics, operative details and radiographic details were recorded. THAs in which a structural graft, cage or augment were used for acetabular reconstruction were considered to have undergone a major reconstructive procedure and a classification system was proposed to identify patients requiring major reconstruction. 10 (8%) THAs required a major reconstruction in our cohort (2- augment, 8- structural allograft. There was significant difference in acetabular defects based on the etiology. Major reconstruction was more common when the diagnosis was sequalae of tuberculosis or post-traumatic arthritis. Simple cavitatory defects seldom required a major reconstruction while combined defects and medial wall deficiency increased the risk of requiring a major reconstruction. The severity of defects varied considerably with majority of patients having cavitatory type of defect which can be successfully managed without the need of any major reconstructive measures. A simple classification based on the type of defect and medial wall competency appeared to be useful in identifying patients who may need a major reconstructive procedure during THA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0976-5662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>acetabular protrusion ; classification ; reconstruction ; total hip arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025-01, p.102847, Article 102847</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c967-1e5220bf2c5529ef52056e6db690bd9fbe6e3c4604d8faef00319152f076f1123</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8104-320X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gautam, Deepak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Jaiben</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing Acetabular Defects and Need of Major Reconstruction During Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Acetabular Protrusion- A Retrospective Study</title><title>Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma</title><description>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with acetabular protrusion can be challenging due to the lack of acetabular bone support. Some patients may require a major reconstructive procedure to aid in the fixation of the acetabular components. The purpose of the study was to characterize the type of acetabular defects in patients with protrusion and to assess the need for major reconstruction. This was a retrospective study of 125 THAs performed at a single tertiary center from 2010 to 2020 by a single surgeon in patients with acetabular protrusion. Demographics, operative details and radiographic details were recorded. THAs in which a structural graft, cage or augment were used for acetabular reconstruction were considered to have undergone a major reconstructive procedure and a classification system was proposed to identify patients requiring major reconstruction. 10 (8%) THAs required a major reconstruction in our cohort (2- augment, 8- structural allograft. There was significant difference in acetabular defects based on the etiology. Major reconstruction was more common when the diagnosis was sequalae of tuberculosis or post-traumatic arthritis. Simple cavitatory defects seldom required a major reconstruction while combined defects and medial wall deficiency increased the risk of requiring a major reconstruction. The severity of defects varied considerably with majority of patients having cavitatory type of defect which can be successfully managed without the need of any major reconstructive measures. A simple classification based on the type of defect and medial wall competency appeared to be useful in identifying patients who may need a major reconstructive procedure during THA.</description><subject>acetabular protrusion</subject><subject>classification</subject><subject>reconstruction</subject><subject>total hip arthroplasty</subject><issn>0976-5662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhb0Aiar0Aqx8gRTbTZxGYhO1_EkFKujecpwxdRTiyHaKymE4K47KghWzGWmk9715D6ErSuaUUH7dzBtlw5wRlsYDW6b5GZqQIudJxjm7QDPvGxIn47Sgywn6Xu2lkyqAM1-me8elgiCroZUOr0GDCh7LrsbPADW2Gj_Jxjr8Csp2PrhBBWM7vB7cKN3ZIFv8YHpcurB3tm-lD0dsOryVwUAXUZ8m7P9abJ2NFB8hCS4jNjjr-2hqDoDfwlAfL9G5lq2H2e-eot3d7W71kGxe7h9X5SZRBc8TChljpNJMZRkrQGcs5gNeV7wgVV3oCjgsVMpJWi-1BE3IIqbPmCY515SyxRSxE1bFB7wDLXpnPqQ7CkrE2KtoxNirGHsVp16j6OYkgvjYwYATXsWYCmrjYgZRW_Of_AfmToaD</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Malhotra, Rajesh</creator><creator>Gautam, Deepak</creator><creator>George, Jaiben</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-320X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Characterizing Acetabular Defects and Need of Major Reconstruction During Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Acetabular Protrusion- A Retrospective Study</title><author>Malhotra, Rajesh ; Gautam, Deepak ; George, Jaiben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c967-1e5220bf2c5529ef52056e6db690bd9fbe6e3c4604d8faef00319152f076f1123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>acetabular protrusion</topic><topic>classification</topic><topic>reconstruction</topic><topic>total hip arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malhotra, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gautam, Deepak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Jaiben</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malhotra, Rajesh</au><au>Gautam, Deepak</au><au>George, Jaiben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing Acetabular Defects and Need of Major Reconstruction During Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Acetabular Protrusion- A Retrospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma</jtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><spage>102847</spage><pages>102847-</pages><artnum>102847</artnum><issn>0976-5662</issn><abstract>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with acetabular protrusion can be challenging due to the lack of acetabular bone support. Some patients may require a major reconstructive procedure to aid in the fixation of the acetabular components. The purpose of the study was to characterize the type of acetabular defects in patients with protrusion and to assess the need for major reconstruction. This was a retrospective study of 125 THAs performed at a single tertiary center from 2010 to 2020 by a single surgeon in patients with acetabular protrusion. Demographics, operative details and radiographic details were recorded. THAs in which a structural graft, cage or augment were used for acetabular reconstruction were considered to have undergone a major reconstructive procedure and a classification system was proposed to identify patients requiring major reconstruction. 10 (8%) THAs required a major reconstruction in our cohort (2- augment, 8- structural allograft. There was significant difference in acetabular defects based on the etiology. Major reconstruction was more common when the diagnosis was sequalae of tuberculosis or post-traumatic arthritis. Simple cavitatory defects seldom required a major reconstruction while combined defects and medial wall deficiency increased the risk of requiring a major reconstruction. The severity of defects varied considerably with majority of patients having cavitatory type of defect which can be successfully managed without the need of any major reconstructive measures. A simple classification based on the type of defect and medial wall competency appeared to be useful in identifying patients who may need a major reconstructive procedure during THA.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102847</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-320X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0976-5662
ispartof Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025-01, p.102847, Article 102847
issn 0976-5662
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcot_2024_102847
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects acetabular protrusion
classification
reconstruction
total hip arthroplasty
title Characterizing Acetabular Defects and Need of Major Reconstruction During Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Acetabular Protrusion- A Retrospective Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T12%3A52%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20Acetabular%20Defects%20and%20Need%20of%20Major%20Reconstruction%20During%20Total%20Hip%20Arthroplasty%20in%20Patients%20with%20Acetabular%20Protrusion-%20A%20Retrospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20trauma&rft.au=Malhotra,%20Rajesh&rft.date=2025-01&rft.spage=102847&rft.pages=102847-&rft.artnum=102847&rft.issn=0976-5662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102847&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0976566224005162%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c967-1e5220bf2c5529ef52056e6db690bd9fbe6e3c4604d8faef00319152f076f1123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true