Loading…
Influence of the target product on the electrochemical reduction of diluted CO2 in a continuous flow cell
To date, research on CO2 reduction is almost exclusively performed with pure CO2 while exhaust streams often contain low concentrations of CO2. Direct usage of flue gases avoids the energy intensive CO2 capture step before utilization. This study compares the production of CO and formate on Ag and S...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of CO2 utilization 2022-11, Vol.65, p.102210, Article 102210 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To date, research on CO2 reduction is almost exclusively performed with pure CO2 while exhaust streams often contain low concentrations of CO2. Direct usage of flue gases avoids the energy intensive CO2 capture step before utilization. This study compares the production of CO and formate on Ag and SnO2 catalysts respectively in order to find the most suitable target product for N2-diluted feed streams. Initial product selectivity screening for different CO2 feed stream compositions was performed at 100 mA/cm2. Excessive hydrogen evolution emerged below 40 % CO2 for the silver catalyst while SnO2 maintained a Faradaic efficiency to formate > 70 % even at 10 % CO2. Both catalysts were further tested at current densities up to 300 mA/cm2 and show a shift of hydrogen evolution onset to more concentrated CO2 streams. These results indicate that formate production is more interesting when utilizing N2-diluted CO2 feed streams compared to CO production.
[Display omitted]
•The importance of the target product and effect on the OH− balance is demonstrated.•> 70 % Faradaic efficiency to formate for 10 % CO2 feed streams at 100 mA/cm2.•Production of formate on SnO2 is less sensitive than CO on Ag for diluted CO2 feeds. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2212-9820 2212-9839 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102210 |