Loading…
Energetics of dehydroepiandrosterone polymorphs I and II from solution and drop-sublimation Calvet microcalorimetry measurements
•Form I of dehydroepiandrosterone has a larger lattice energy than phase II.•Dehydroepiandrosterone forms I and II are monotropically related.•A new calorimetric cell for solution calorimetry is described and tested. The lattice enthalpies and monotropic relationship of two dehydroepiandrosterone (D...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of chemical thermodynamics 2023-11, Vol.186, p.107137, Article 107137 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Form I of dehydroepiandrosterone has a larger lattice energy than phase II.•Dehydroepiandrosterone forms I and II are monotropically related.•A new calorimetric cell for solution calorimetry is described and tested.
The lattice enthalpies and monotropic relationship of two dehydroepiandrosterone (DEHA) polymorphs (forms I and II) were evaluated through a combination of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), isothermal solution microcalorimetry, and drop-sublimation Calvet microcalorimetry experiments. The standard molar enthalpy of transition between both forms was determined as ΔtrsHmo(II→I, 298.15 K) = −0.90 ± 0.07 kJ mol−1 and ΔtrsHmo(II→I, 417.8 K) = −1.7 ± 1.0 kJ mol−1, from measurements of standard molar enthalpies of solution in dimethyl sulfoxide and enthalpies of fusion, respectively. Drop-sublimation Calvet microcalorimetry experiments on form I led to ΔsubHmo(cr I, 298.15 K) = 132.0±3.3 kJ mol−1. This result, when combined with the more precise ΔtrsHmo(II→I) value obtained by solution calorimetry, afforded ΔsubHmo(cr II, 298.15 K) = 131.1±3.3 kJ mol−1. The overall data indicate that on enthalpic grounds form I is more stable than form II from 298.15 K up to fusion. This conclusion, and the fact that DSC experiments indicated that form I has also a considerably higher temperature fusion, namely, Tfus(cr I)= 422.5±0.2 K and Tfus(cr II) = 413.1±0.2 K, suggest that the two polymorphs are monotropically related. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9614 1096-3626 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jct.2023.107137 |