Loading…

Using social connections and financial incentives to solve coordination failure: A quasi-field experiment in India's manufacturing sector

Production processes are often organized in teams, yet there is limited evidence on whether and how social connections and financial incentives affect productivity in tasks that require coordination among workers. We simulate assembly line production in a lab-in-the-field experiment in which workers...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of development economics 2020-05, Vol.144, p.102445, Article 102445
Main Authors: Afridi, Farzana, Dhillon, Amrita, Li, Sherry Xin, Sharma, Swati
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Production processes are often organized in teams, yet there is limited evidence on whether and how social connections and financial incentives affect productivity in tasks that require coordination among workers. We simulate assembly line production in a lab-in-the-field experiment in which workers exert real effort in a minimum-effort game in teams whose members are either socially connected or unconnected and are paid according to the group output. We find that group output increases by 18%, and coordination improves by 30–39% when workers are socially connected with their co-workers. These findings can plausibly be explained by the higher levels of pro-social motivation between co-workers in socially connected teams. •Social connections can affect productivity in coordination tasks.•Minimum effort game in lab-in-the-field experiment.•Team members either socially connected or unconnected.•Group output higher by 18%, and coordination by 30–39% for socially connected.•Higher levels of pro-social motivation between co-workers in socially connected teams.
ISSN:0304-3878
1872-6089
DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102445