Loading…

Land and labor allocation under communal tenure: Theory and evidence from China

This paper studies rural communities' land and labor choices under communal tenure. I develop a theoretical framework to explain why rural communities often adopt practices of labor-contingent land access and frequent land reallocations under communal tenure, and argue that, although these prac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of development economics 2020-11, Vol.147, p.102526, Article 102526
Main Author: Zhao, Xiaoxue
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper studies rural communities' land and labor choices under communal tenure. I develop a theoretical framework to explain why rural communities often adopt practices of labor-contingent land access and frequent land reallocations under communal tenure, and argue that, although these practices reduce cross-household income inequality and improve agricultural production efficiency under imperfect markets, they can nonetheless inefficiently trap labor in agriculture. I rely on a legal reform in 2003 that stopped land reallocations in all Chinese villages and exploit the variation in villages’ reallocation practices before the reform to test the model predictions. The results suggest that the elimination of land reallocations increased off-farm labor and household per capita net income by 7% and 6.5% respectively. However, this came at the cost of a 6% reduction in total agricultural output and a significant jump in intra-village income inequality. •I explain why rural communities adopt labor-contingent land access and frequent land reallocations under communal tenure.•I find that a reform that banned land reallocations in China increased off-farm labor by 7%.•The reform also increased household per capita net income by 6.5%.•However, banning reallocations decreased agricultural production efficiency and increased intra-village income inequality.•The results suggest that communal institutions with welfare benefits may sometimes deter efficient structural transformation.
ISSN:0304-3878
1872-6089
DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102526