Loading…
Benchmarking environmental and economic indicators of sludge management alternatives aimed at enhanced energy efficiency and nutrient recovery
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been developed as multifunctional systems that aim to eliminate pollutants present in wastewater, manage the sludge produced and improve energy efficiency. Specifically, sludge management accounts for the largest share in operational costs. Considering the re...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of environmental management 2021-02, Vol.279, p.111594, Article 111594 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9b671d8afe76fe4f4a4776a57b965379574bebb3f6423d94b93849573ac0024b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9b671d8afe76fe4f4a4776a57b965379574bebb3f6423d94b93849573ac0024b3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 111594 |
container_title | Journal of environmental management |
container_volume | 279 |
creator | Arias, A. Feijoo, G. Moreira, M.T. |
description | Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been developed as multifunctional systems that aim to eliminate pollutants present in wastewater, manage the sludge produced and improve energy efficiency. Specifically, sludge management accounts for the largest share in operational costs. Considering the relevant role of sludge treatment within the overall management scheme, this study aims to evaluate different alternatives and strategies for sludge management and treatment from the perspective of life cycle analysis, with special emphasis on those options that reduce environmental impacts and economic costs. Two pre-treatments (chemical or thermal) and two post-treatments (composting unit followed by land application or incineration) were evaluated to improve the eco-balance of the anaerobic digestion (AD) process in terms of operational (biogas production and digested sludge), environmental and economic indicators. According to the results obtained, both sludge pre-treatment alternatives proved to be an adequate alternative to improve biogas production without negatively affecting environmental and economic impacts. Finally, if the final disposal of the digestate is analysed, its application to the soil as a biofertiliser is recommended, since it presents a better environmental profile than incineration.
•Sludge pre-treatments present a good environmental profile when are included in a sludge line.•The incorporation of sludge pre-treatments does not increase significantly operational costs.•Pre-treatments increase biogas production which implies more eco-efficient wastewater systems.•Payback time is reduced in the plants that incorporate a sludge pre-treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111594 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2020_111594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030147972031519X</els_id><sourcerecordid>33160744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9b671d8afe76fe4f4a4776a57b965379574bebb3f6423d94b93849573ac0024b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1OwyAUx4nRuDl9BA0v0AmFwnpl1PiVLPFGrwmlh4660gW6JXsJn1n2obdeQU7-H-f8ELqmZEoJFbfttAW_6bSf5iRPM0qLkp-gMSVlkc0EI6doTBihGZelHKGLGFtCCMupPEcjxqggkvMx-n4AbxadDl_ONzglutD7Dvygl1j7GoPpfd85g52vndFDHyLuLY7Ldd0ATvW6gZ0c6-UAwevBbSBi7TqosR5S4EJ7k_7gITRbDNY641Lldp_u10NwO3dIPRsI20t0ZvUywtXxnaDP56ePx9ds_v7y9ng_zwwTxZCVlZC0nmkLUljglmsupdCFrEpRMFkWkldQVcwKnrO65FXJZjxNmTaE5LxiE1Qcck3oYwxg1Sq4RGGrKFE7vqpVR75qx1cd-CbfzcG3WlfpxD_XL9AkuDsIIG2_cRBU3N8LtUs3Dqru3T8VPy8uko0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benchmarking environmental and economic indicators of sludge management alternatives aimed at enhanced energy efficiency and nutrient recovery</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Arias, A. ; Feijoo, G. ; Moreira, M.T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arias, A. ; Feijoo, G. ; Moreira, M.T.</creatorcontrib><description>Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been developed as multifunctional systems that aim to eliminate pollutants present in wastewater, manage the sludge produced and improve energy efficiency. Specifically, sludge management accounts for the largest share in operational costs. Considering the relevant role of sludge treatment within the overall management scheme, this study aims to evaluate different alternatives and strategies for sludge management and treatment from the perspective of life cycle analysis, with special emphasis on those options that reduce environmental impacts and economic costs. Two pre-treatments (chemical or thermal) and two post-treatments (composting unit followed by land application or incineration) were evaluated to improve the eco-balance of the anaerobic digestion (AD) process in terms of operational (biogas production and digested sludge), environmental and economic indicators. According to the results obtained, both sludge pre-treatment alternatives proved to be an adequate alternative to improve biogas production without negatively affecting environmental and economic impacts. Finally, if the final disposal of the digestate is analysed, its application to the soil as a biofertiliser is recommended, since it presents a better environmental profile than incineration.
•Sludge pre-treatments present a good environmental profile when are included in a sludge line.•The incorporation of sludge pre-treatments does not increase significantly operational costs.•Pre-treatments increase biogas production which implies more eco-efficient wastewater systems.•Payback time is reduced in the plants that incorporate a sludge pre-treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33160744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Biogas production ; Chemical pre-treatment ; Economic analysis (EA) ; Life cycle assessment (LCA) ; Nutrients ; Sewage ; Thermal hydrolysis (TH) process ; Waste Disposal, Fluid ; Waste Water</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2021-02, Vol.279, p.111594, Article 111594</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9b671d8afe76fe4f4a4776a57b965379574bebb3f6423d94b93849573ac0024b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9b671d8afe76fe4f4a4776a57b965379574bebb3f6423d94b93849573ac0024b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33160744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arias, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feijoo, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, M.T.</creatorcontrib><title>Benchmarking environmental and economic indicators of sludge management alternatives aimed at enhanced energy efficiency and nutrient recovery</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been developed as multifunctional systems that aim to eliminate pollutants present in wastewater, manage the sludge produced and improve energy efficiency. Specifically, sludge management accounts for the largest share in operational costs. Considering the relevant role of sludge treatment within the overall management scheme, this study aims to evaluate different alternatives and strategies for sludge management and treatment from the perspective of life cycle analysis, with special emphasis on those options that reduce environmental impacts and economic costs. Two pre-treatments (chemical or thermal) and two post-treatments (composting unit followed by land application or incineration) were evaluated to improve the eco-balance of the anaerobic digestion (AD) process in terms of operational (biogas production and digested sludge), environmental and economic indicators. According to the results obtained, both sludge pre-treatment alternatives proved to be an adequate alternative to improve biogas production without negatively affecting environmental and economic impacts. Finally, if the final disposal of the digestate is analysed, its application to the soil as a biofertiliser is recommended, since it presents a better environmental profile than incineration.
•Sludge pre-treatments present a good environmental profile when are included in a sludge line.•The incorporation of sludge pre-treatments does not increase significantly operational costs.•Pre-treatments increase biogas production which implies more eco-efficient wastewater systems.•Payback time is reduced in the plants that incorporate a sludge pre-treatment.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Biogas production</subject><subject>Chemical pre-treatment</subject><subject>Economic analysis (EA)</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment (LCA)</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Thermal hydrolysis (TH) process</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><subject>Waste Water</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkN1OwyAUx4nRuDl9BA0v0AmFwnpl1PiVLPFGrwmlh4660gW6JXsJn1n2obdeQU7-H-f8ELqmZEoJFbfttAW_6bSf5iRPM0qLkp-gMSVlkc0EI6doTBihGZelHKGLGFtCCMupPEcjxqggkvMx-n4AbxadDl_ONzglutD7Dvygl1j7GoPpfd85g52vndFDHyLuLY7Ldd0ATvW6gZ0c6-UAwevBbSBi7TqosR5S4EJ7k_7gITRbDNY641Lldp_u10NwO3dIPRsI20t0ZvUywtXxnaDP56ePx9ds_v7y9ng_zwwTxZCVlZC0nmkLUljglmsupdCFrEpRMFkWkldQVcwKnrO65FXJZjxNmTaE5LxiE1Qcck3oYwxg1Sq4RGGrKFE7vqpVR75qx1cd-CbfzcG3WlfpxD_XL9AkuDsIIG2_cRBU3N8LtUs3Dqru3T8VPy8uko0</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Arias, A.</creator><creator>Feijoo, G.</creator><creator>Moreira, M.T.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Benchmarking environmental and economic indicators of sludge management alternatives aimed at enhanced energy efficiency and nutrient recovery</title><author>Arias, A. ; Feijoo, G. ; Moreira, M.T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9b671d8afe76fe4f4a4776a57b965379574bebb3f6423d94b93849573ac0024b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Biogas production</topic><topic>Chemical pre-treatment</topic><topic>Economic analysis (EA)</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment (LCA)</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Thermal hydrolysis (TH) process</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid</topic><topic>Waste Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arias, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feijoo, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, M.T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arias, A.</au><au>Feijoo, G.</au><au>Moreira, M.T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benchmarking environmental and economic indicators of sludge management alternatives aimed at enhanced energy efficiency and nutrient recovery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>279</volume><spage>111594</spage><pages>111594-</pages><artnum>111594</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been developed as multifunctional systems that aim to eliminate pollutants present in wastewater, manage the sludge produced and improve energy efficiency. Specifically, sludge management accounts for the largest share in operational costs. Considering the relevant role of sludge treatment within the overall management scheme, this study aims to evaluate different alternatives and strategies for sludge management and treatment from the perspective of life cycle analysis, with special emphasis on those options that reduce environmental impacts and economic costs. Two pre-treatments (chemical or thermal) and two post-treatments (composting unit followed by land application or incineration) were evaluated to improve the eco-balance of the anaerobic digestion (AD) process in terms of operational (biogas production and digested sludge), environmental and economic indicators. According to the results obtained, both sludge pre-treatment alternatives proved to be an adequate alternative to improve biogas production without negatively affecting environmental and economic impacts. Finally, if the final disposal of the digestate is analysed, its application to the soil as a biofertiliser is recommended, since it presents a better environmental profile than incineration.
•Sludge pre-treatments present a good environmental profile when are included in a sludge line.•The incorporation of sludge pre-treatments does not increase significantly operational costs.•Pre-treatments increase biogas production which implies more eco-efficient wastewater systems.•Payback time is reduced in the plants that incorporate a sludge pre-treatment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33160744</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111594</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4797 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental management, 2021-02, Vol.279, p.111594, Article 111594 |
issn | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2020_111594 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Benchmarking Biogas production Chemical pre-treatment Economic analysis (EA) Life cycle assessment (LCA) Nutrients Sewage Thermal hydrolysis (TH) process Waste Disposal, Fluid Waste Water |
title | Benchmarking environmental and economic indicators of sludge management alternatives aimed at enhanced energy efficiency and nutrient recovery |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A41%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benchmarking%20environmental%20and%20economic%20indicators%20of%20sludge%20management%20alternatives%20aimed%20at%20enhanced%20energy%20efficiency%20and%20nutrient%20recovery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Arias,%20A.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=279&rft.spage=111594&rft.pages=111594-&rft.artnum=111594&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111594&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E33160744%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9b671d8afe76fe4f4a4776a57b965379574bebb3f6423d94b93849573ac0024b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33160744&rfr_iscdi=true |