Loading…

The impact of environmental regulation on firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese cement industry

The relationship between environmental regulation and firm performance is a central question in environmental economics. Although many empirical works study this question, economists have not reached a consensus on the nature of the relationship or the mechanism that drives it. Based on the off-peak...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental management 2021-12, Vol.299, p.113596, Article 113596
Main Authors: Wang, Qinyun, Xu, Xindi, Liang, Kaipeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The relationship between environmental regulation and firm performance is a central question in environmental economics. Although many empirical works study this question, economists have not reached a consensus on the nature of the relationship or the mechanism that drives it. Based on the off-peak production policy in the Chinese cement market, this paper uses the differences-in-differences model to study the impact of environmental regulation on the revenue and profit of listed companies. We find that the environmental regulation has negative impacts on firms’ revenue and profit. According to further analysis, the main reason for this firm performance decline is that the relatively large elasticity of market demand prevents enterprises from passing regulatory costs through to consumers. Although the policy has caused the cement price to increase by 8%, it has led cement consumption to decrease by 16%. •Fuzzy Differences-in-Differences model is applied to estimate the effects of the Cement Off-peak Production Policy.•The Cement Off-peak Production Policy has negative effect on firm performance of cement industry.•The large price elasticity of demand in an industry with low demand is the main cause of the policy effect.
ISSN:0301-4797
1095-8630
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113596