Loading…
Uncertainty about what is in the price
A critical question facing speculators contemplating to trade on private information is whether their signal has already been priced in by the market. In our model, speculators assess the novelty of their information based on recent price movements, and market makers are aware that speculators might...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of financial economics 2024-11, Vol.161, p.103915, Article 103915 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d2011dd57e7b5b5f04d01479e13ebf16fc3c625e3a66edd6619c61d21086a88e3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103915 |
container_title | Journal of financial economics |
container_volume | 161 |
creator | Peress, Joël Schmidt, Daniel |
description | A critical question facing speculators contemplating to trade on private information is whether their signal has already been priced in by the market. In our model, speculators assess the novelty of their information based on recent price movements, and market makers are aware that speculators might be trading on stale news. An asymmetric response to past price movements ensues: after price increases, buy volume – because it may result from stale news trading – has a lower price impact than sell volume (and vice versa after price decreases). Consequently, return skewness is negatively related to lagged returns. We find strong support for these and other predictions using a comprehensive sample of US stocks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103915 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfineco_2024_103915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304405X24001387</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0304405X24001387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d2011dd57e7b5b5f04d01479e13ebf16fc3c625e3a66edd6619c61d21086a88e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj81KAzEUhbNQsFYfQcjK3dTcZJKZWYkUtULBjQV3IZPc0Aw6I0lU-vamTPfezYEL5-cj5AbYChiou2E1-DCinVac8br8RAfyjCyYYHVVM_l-QS5TGli5RnYLcrsbLcZswpgP1PTTd6a_e5NpSDSMNO-RfsVg8Yqce_OR8PqkS7J7enxbb6rt6_PL-mFbWd7xXDnOAJyTDTa97KVntWNQNx2CwN6D8lZYxSUKoxQ6pxR0VoHjwFpl2hbFksg518YppYhel_pPEw8amD4C6kGfAPURUM-AxXc_-7CM-wkYdbIBC5oLEW3Wbgr_JPwBDN9dEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncertainty about what is in the price</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Peress, Joël ; Schmidt, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Peress, Joël ; Schmidt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>A critical question facing speculators contemplating to trade on private information is whether their signal has already been priced in by the market. In our model, speculators assess the novelty of their information based on recent price movements, and market makers are aware that speculators might be trading on stale news. An asymmetric response to past price movements ensues: after price increases, buy volume – because it may result from stale news trading – has a lower price impact than sell volume (and vice versa after price decreases). Consequently, return skewness is negatively related to lagged returns. We find strong support for these and other predictions using a comprehensive sample of US stocks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-405X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Learning from prices ; Price impact ; Strategic trading</subject><ispartof>Journal of financial economics, 2024-11, Vol.161, p.103915, Article 103915</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d2011dd57e7b5b5f04d01479e13ebf16fc3c625e3a66edd6619c61d21086a88e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2869-1590</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peress, Joël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Uncertainty about what is in the price</title><title>Journal of financial economics</title><description>A critical question facing speculators contemplating to trade on private information is whether their signal has already been priced in by the market. In our model, speculators assess the novelty of their information based on recent price movements, and market makers are aware that speculators might be trading on stale news. An asymmetric response to past price movements ensues: after price increases, buy volume – because it may result from stale news trading – has a lower price impact than sell volume (and vice versa after price decreases). Consequently, return skewness is negatively related to lagged returns. We find strong support for these and other predictions using a comprehensive sample of US stocks.</description><subject>Learning from prices</subject><subject>Price impact</subject><subject>Strategic trading</subject><issn>0304-405X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj81KAzEUhbNQsFYfQcjK3dTcZJKZWYkUtULBjQV3IZPc0Aw6I0lU-vamTPfezYEL5-cj5AbYChiou2E1-DCinVac8br8RAfyjCyYYHVVM_l-QS5TGli5RnYLcrsbLcZswpgP1PTTd6a_e5NpSDSMNO-RfsVg8Yqce_OR8PqkS7J7enxbb6rt6_PL-mFbWd7xXDnOAJyTDTa97KVntWNQNx2CwN6D8lZYxSUKoxQ6pxR0VoHjwFpl2hbFksg518YppYhel_pPEw8amD4C6kGfAPURUM-AxXc_-7CM-wkYdbIBC5oLEW3Wbgr_JPwBDN9dEg</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Peress, Joël</creator><creator>Schmidt, Daniel</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2869-1590</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Uncertainty about what is in the price</title><author>Peress, Joël ; Schmidt, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d2011dd57e7b5b5f04d01479e13ebf16fc3c625e3a66edd6619c61d21086a88e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Learning from prices</topic><topic>Price impact</topic><topic>Strategic trading</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peress, Joël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of financial economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peress, Joël</au><au>Schmidt, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncertainty about what is in the price</atitle><jtitle>Journal of financial economics</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>161</volume><spage>103915</spage><pages>103915-</pages><artnum>103915</artnum><issn>0304-405X</issn><abstract>A critical question facing speculators contemplating to trade on private information is whether their signal has already been priced in by the market. In our model, speculators assess the novelty of their information based on recent price movements, and market makers are aware that speculators might be trading on stale news. An asymmetric response to past price movements ensues: after price increases, buy volume – because it may result from stale news trading – has a lower price impact than sell volume (and vice versa after price decreases). Consequently, return skewness is negatively related to lagged returns. We find strong support for these and other predictions using a comprehensive sample of US stocks.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103915</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2869-1590</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-405X |
ispartof | Journal of financial economics, 2024-11, Vol.161, p.103915, Article 103915 |
issn | 0304-405X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfineco_2024_103915 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Learning from prices Price impact Strategic trading |
title | Uncertainty about what is in the price |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A50%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainty%20about%20what%20is%20in%20the%20price&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20financial%20economics&rft.au=Peress,%20Jo%C3%ABl&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=161&rft.spage=103915&rft.pages=103915-&rft.artnum=103915&rft.issn=0304-405X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103915&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0304405X24001387%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d2011dd57e7b5b5f04d01479e13ebf16fc3c625e3a66edd6619c61d21086a88e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |