Loading…

Second-order discontinuous Galerkin flood model: Comparison with industry-standard finite volume models

•Second-order discontinuous Galerkin (DG2) flood model is compared to FV-based industrial models.•Variants of the DG2 model are explored with and without local slope limiting.•DG2 shows superior resistance to numerical diffusions leading to better momentum conservations.•The DG2 variant with no slop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2021-03, Vol.594, p.125924, Article 125924
Main Authors: Ayog, Janice Lynn, Kesserwani, Georges, Shaw, James, Sharifian, Mohammad Kazem, Bau, Domenico
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2392124d01affb3d7299faa936b7bb852e007245a2d709f746c4daef54ea849a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2392124d01affb3d7299faa936b7bb852e007245a2d709f746c4daef54ea849a3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 125924
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 594
creator Ayog, Janice Lynn
Kesserwani, Georges
Shaw, James
Sharifian, Mohammad Kazem
Bau, Domenico
description •Second-order discontinuous Galerkin (DG2) flood model is compared to FV-based industrial models.•Variants of the DG2 model are explored with and without local slope limiting.•DG2 shows superior resistance to numerical diffusions leading to better momentum conservations.•The DG2 variant with no slope limiter outperforms for flows that are typical of flood inundation.•DG2 produces more accurate hydrographs in certain scenarios and/or on coarser grids. Finite volume (FV) numerical solvers of the two-dimensional shallow water equations are core to industry-standard flood models. The second-order Discontinuous Galerkin (DG2) alternative, although a viable way forward to improve current FV-based flood models, is yet under-studied and rarely used to support flood modelling applications. This paper systematically explores and compares the predictive properties of a robust DG2 flood model to those of prominent FV-based industrial flood models. To identify the simplest and most efficient DG2 configuration suitable for flood inundation modelling, two variants – with and without local slope limiting – are considered. The numerical conservation properties of the DG2 variants are compared to those of a first-order FV (FV1) and a second-order FV (FV2) counterparts. The DG2 variants are then tested over five realistic flooding scenarios, recommended by the UK Environment Agency to validate 2D flood model capabilities, while comparing their performance against that of four FV-based commercial models (i.e. TUFLOW-FV1, TUFLOW-FV2, TUFLOW-HPC and Infoworks ICM). Results reveal that the DG2 variant without local limiting (DG2-NL) is capable to simulate shockless flood flows featured in a wide range of flood modelling applications. The DG2-NL shows closer predictions to commercial model outputs at twice-coarser spatial resolution, and can run twice faster to produce more informative hydrograph with small-scale transients over long-range simulations, even when the sampling is far away from the flooding source.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125924
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2020_125924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169420313858</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0022169420313858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2392124d01affb3d7299faa936b7bb852e007245a2d709f746c4daef54ea849a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNFKwzAUhoMoOKePIOQFOpM0bRZvRIZOYeCFeh3S5sSltslI2snefh3dvefmcH74fg4fQveULCih5UOzaLYHE0O7YISNGSsk4xdoRpdCZkwQcYlmhDCW0VLya3STUkPGyXM-Qz-fUAdvshANRGxcGq_e-SEMCa91C_HXeWzbEAzugoH2Ea9Ct9PRpeDxn-u32HkzpD4estRrb3Q02DrvesD70A4dTFi6RVdWtwnuznuOvl9fvlZv2eZj_b563mR1XpR9xnLJKOOGUG1tlRvBpLRay7ysRFUtCwaECMYLzYwg0gpe1txosAUHveRS53NUTL11DClFsGoXXafjQVGiTrZUo8621MmWmmyN3NPEjb_C3kFUqXbgazAuQt0rE9w_DUeygHi3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Second-order discontinuous Galerkin flood model: Comparison with industry-standard finite volume models</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Ayog, Janice Lynn ; Kesserwani, Georges ; Shaw, James ; Sharifian, Mohammad Kazem ; Bau, Domenico</creator><creatorcontrib>Ayog, Janice Lynn ; Kesserwani, Georges ; Shaw, James ; Sharifian, Mohammad Kazem ; Bau, Domenico</creatorcontrib><description>•Second-order discontinuous Galerkin (DG2) flood model is compared to FV-based industrial models.•Variants of the DG2 model are explored with and without local slope limiting.•DG2 shows superior resistance to numerical diffusions leading to better momentum conservations.•The DG2 variant with no slope limiter outperforms for flows that are typical of flood inundation.•DG2 produces more accurate hydrographs in certain scenarios and/or on coarser grids. Finite volume (FV) numerical solvers of the two-dimensional shallow water equations are core to industry-standard flood models. The second-order Discontinuous Galerkin (DG2) alternative, although a viable way forward to improve current FV-based flood models, is yet under-studied and rarely used to support flood modelling applications. This paper systematically explores and compares the predictive properties of a robust DG2 flood model to those of prominent FV-based industrial flood models. To identify the simplest and most efficient DG2 configuration suitable for flood inundation modelling, two variants – with and without local slope limiting – are considered. The numerical conservation properties of the DG2 variants are compared to those of a first-order FV (FV1) and a second-order FV (FV2) counterparts. The DG2 variants are then tested over five realistic flooding scenarios, recommended by the UK Environment Agency to validate 2D flood model capabilities, while comparing their performance against that of four FV-based commercial models (i.e. TUFLOW-FV1, TUFLOW-FV2, TUFLOW-HPC and Infoworks ICM). Results reveal that the DG2 variant without local limiting (DG2-NL) is capable to simulate shockless flood flows featured in a wide range of flood modelling applications. The DG2-NL shows closer predictions to commercial model outputs at twice-coarser spatial resolution, and can run twice faster to produce more informative hydrograph with small-scale transients over long-range simulations, even when the sampling is far away from the flooding source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Discontinuous Galerkin ; Flood modelling ; Performance evaluation ; Practical implications</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2021-03, Vol.594, p.125924, Article 125924</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2392124d01affb3d7299faa936b7bb852e007245a2d709f746c4daef54ea849a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2392124d01affb3d7299faa936b7bb852e007245a2d709f746c4daef54ea849a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ayog, Janice Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesserwani, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifian, Mohammad Kazem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bau, Domenico</creatorcontrib><title>Second-order discontinuous Galerkin flood model: Comparison with industry-standard finite volume models</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>•Second-order discontinuous Galerkin (DG2) flood model is compared to FV-based industrial models.•Variants of the DG2 model are explored with and without local slope limiting.•DG2 shows superior resistance to numerical diffusions leading to better momentum conservations.•The DG2 variant with no slope limiter outperforms for flows that are typical of flood inundation.•DG2 produces more accurate hydrographs in certain scenarios and/or on coarser grids. Finite volume (FV) numerical solvers of the two-dimensional shallow water equations are core to industry-standard flood models. The second-order Discontinuous Galerkin (DG2) alternative, although a viable way forward to improve current FV-based flood models, is yet under-studied and rarely used to support flood modelling applications. This paper systematically explores and compares the predictive properties of a robust DG2 flood model to those of prominent FV-based industrial flood models. To identify the simplest and most efficient DG2 configuration suitable for flood inundation modelling, two variants – with and without local slope limiting – are considered. The numerical conservation properties of the DG2 variants are compared to those of a first-order FV (FV1) and a second-order FV (FV2) counterparts. The DG2 variants are then tested over five realistic flooding scenarios, recommended by the UK Environment Agency to validate 2D flood model capabilities, while comparing their performance against that of four FV-based commercial models (i.e. TUFLOW-FV1, TUFLOW-FV2, TUFLOW-HPC and Infoworks ICM). Results reveal that the DG2 variant without local limiting (DG2-NL) is capable to simulate shockless flood flows featured in a wide range of flood modelling applications. The DG2-NL shows closer predictions to commercial model outputs at twice-coarser spatial resolution, and can run twice faster to produce more informative hydrograph with small-scale transients over long-range simulations, even when the sampling is far away from the flooding source.</description><subject>Discontinuous Galerkin</subject><subject>Flood modelling</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Practical implications</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkNFKwzAUhoMoOKePIOQFOpM0bRZvRIZOYeCFeh3S5sSltslI2snefh3dvefmcH74fg4fQveULCih5UOzaLYHE0O7YISNGSsk4xdoRpdCZkwQcYlmhDCW0VLya3STUkPGyXM-Qz-fUAdvshANRGxcGq_e-SEMCa91C_HXeWzbEAzugoH2Ea9Ct9PRpeDxn-u32HkzpD4estRrb3Q02DrvesD70A4dTFi6RVdWtwnuznuOvl9fvlZv2eZj_b563mR1XpR9xnLJKOOGUG1tlRvBpLRay7ysRFUtCwaECMYLzYwg0gpe1txosAUHveRS53NUTL11DClFsGoXXafjQVGiTrZUo8621MmWmmyN3NPEjb_C3kFUqXbgazAuQt0rE9w_DUeygHi3</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Ayog, Janice Lynn</creator><creator>Kesserwani, Georges</creator><creator>Shaw, James</creator><creator>Sharifian, Mohammad Kazem</creator><creator>Bau, Domenico</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Second-order discontinuous Galerkin flood model: Comparison with industry-standard finite volume models</title><author>Ayog, Janice Lynn ; Kesserwani, Georges ; Shaw, James ; Sharifian, Mohammad Kazem ; Bau, Domenico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2392124d01affb3d7299faa936b7bb852e007245a2d709f746c4daef54ea849a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Discontinuous Galerkin</topic><topic>Flood modelling</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Practical implications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ayog, Janice Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesserwani, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifian, Mohammad Kazem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bau, Domenico</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ayog, Janice Lynn</au><au>Kesserwani, Georges</au><au>Shaw, James</au><au>Sharifian, Mohammad Kazem</au><au>Bau, Domenico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Second-order discontinuous Galerkin flood model: Comparison with industry-standard finite volume models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>594</volume><spage>125924</spage><pages>125924-</pages><artnum>125924</artnum><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><abstract>•Second-order discontinuous Galerkin (DG2) flood model is compared to FV-based industrial models.•Variants of the DG2 model are explored with and without local slope limiting.•DG2 shows superior resistance to numerical diffusions leading to better momentum conservations.•The DG2 variant with no slope limiter outperforms for flows that are typical of flood inundation.•DG2 produces more accurate hydrographs in certain scenarios and/or on coarser grids. Finite volume (FV) numerical solvers of the two-dimensional shallow water equations are core to industry-standard flood models. The second-order Discontinuous Galerkin (DG2) alternative, although a viable way forward to improve current FV-based flood models, is yet under-studied and rarely used to support flood modelling applications. This paper systematically explores and compares the predictive properties of a robust DG2 flood model to those of prominent FV-based industrial flood models. To identify the simplest and most efficient DG2 configuration suitable for flood inundation modelling, two variants – with and without local slope limiting – are considered. The numerical conservation properties of the DG2 variants are compared to those of a first-order FV (FV1) and a second-order FV (FV2) counterparts. The DG2 variants are then tested over five realistic flooding scenarios, recommended by the UK Environment Agency to validate 2D flood model capabilities, while comparing their performance against that of four FV-based commercial models (i.e. TUFLOW-FV1, TUFLOW-FV2, TUFLOW-HPC and Infoworks ICM). Results reveal that the DG2 variant without local limiting (DG2-NL) is capable to simulate shockless flood flows featured in a wide range of flood modelling applications. The DG2-NL shows closer predictions to commercial model outputs at twice-coarser spatial resolution, and can run twice faster to produce more informative hydrograph with small-scale transients over long-range simulations, even when the sampling is far away from the flooding source.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125924</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2021-03, Vol.594, p.125924, Article 125924
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2020_125924
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Discontinuous Galerkin
Flood modelling
Performance evaluation
Practical implications
title Second-order discontinuous Galerkin flood model: Comparison with industry-standard finite volume models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A21%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Second-order%20discontinuous%20Galerkin%20flood%20model:%20Comparison%20with%20industry-standard%20finite%20volume%20models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Ayog,%20Janice%20Lynn&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=594&rft.spage=125924&rft.pages=125924-&rft.artnum=125924&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125924&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0022169420313858%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-2392124d01affb3d7299faa936b7bb852e007245a2d709f746c4daef54ea849a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true