Loading…

Meltwater-driven sediment transport dynamics in two contrasting alpine proglacial streams

•We used a tracer-based approach to quantify melt water proportions related to sediment transport at two contrasting Alpine proglacial streams.•Glacier melt was associated with higher bedload concentrations at the debris-covered glacier and much lower concentrations at the clean ice glacier.•Glacier...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2024-05, Vol.635, p.131171, Article 131171
Main Authors: Engel, Michael, Coviello, Velio, Savi, Sara, Buter, Anuschka, Andreoli, Andrea, Miyata, Shusuke, Marchetti, Giulia, Scorpio, Vittoria, Rathburn, Sara, Nicholson, Lindsey, Comiti, Francesco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-b2a75da6c0a468297d21ddaa91622fd69d37e1fc005ce183dc98fd0a72f797163
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 131171
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 635
creator Engel, Michael
Coviello, Velio
Savi, Sara
Buter, Anuschka
Andreoli, Andrea
Miyata, Shusuke
Marchetti, Giulia
Scorpio, Vittoria
Rathburn, Sara
Nicholson, Lindsey
Comiti, Francesco
description •We used a tracer-based approach to quantify melt water proportions related to sediment transport at two contrasting Alpine proglacial streams.•Glacier melt was associated with higher bedload concentrations at the debris-covered glacier and much lower concentrations at the clean ice glacier.•Glacier size, presence of debris cover, and substrate were identified as the main drivers of melt dynamics and sediment transport at both glaciers. Subglacial sediments are a large component of the sediment budget of glacierized catchments but insights into the subglacial origin of sediments (bedload, in particular) linked to proglacial runoff dynamics remain scarce. In this study, we use a tracer-based approach to quantify meltwater proportions related to sediment transport at two proglacial streams, draining glaciers (named debris-covered and clean glacier) of different size, aspect and elevation range with contrasting distribution and thickness of debris cover and lithology of the subglacial sediments (i.e., metamorphic vs. sedimentary), in the Sulden/Solda catchment (Italian Alps). Results indicate that the glacier melt component (75 to 80 %) was associated with bedload concentrations of 1 to 10 kg m−3 at the debris-covered glacier and much lower concentrations of 0.01 to 1 kg m−3 at the clean ice glacier. At the seasonal scale, bedload and suspended sediment concentrations at both sites strongly varied with discharge. While daily bedload concentrations varied by up to two orders of magnitude obscured the seasonal development of bedload concentrations at both sites, a clear seasonality for suspended sediment concentrations was found. At the daily scale, the relationship of discharge, bedload, and suspended sediment was more complex because discharge and sediment transport did not always follow the daily variation of air temperature, or similar daily air temperatures resulted in different discharge and sediment transport responses and vice versa. Glacier size, presence of debris cover, and substrate were identified as the main drivers of meltwater dynamics and sediment transport at both glaciers. This study adds further insights into the interplay of meltwater contributions and sediment transport, which are essential to better assess the impact of climate warming on sediment supply in glacierized catchments.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131171
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2024_131171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169424005663</els_id><sourcerecordid>3153549747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-b2a75da6c0a468297d21ddaa91622fd69d37e1fc005ce183dc98fd0a72f797163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxT2ARCn8CUgeWVL8kcTNhFDFl1TEAgOTddiX4ihxgu226n9PqnTnlhvuvad7P0JuOFtwxsu7ZtH8HGzo24VgIl9wybniZ2TGmBAZL6v8glzG2LBxpMxn5OsN27SHhCGzwe3Q04jWdegTTQF8HPqQqD146JyJ1Hma9j01vR-PMTm_odAOziMdQr9pwThoaUwBoYtX5LyGNuL1ac_J59Pjx-olW78_v64e1hnIkqXsW4AqLJSGQV4uRaWs4NYCVLwUorZlZaVCXhvGCoN8Ka2plrVloEStKsVLOSe3U-74wu8WY9KdiwbbFjz226glL2SRVypXo7SYpCb0MQas9RBcB-GgOdNHfLrRJ3z6iE9P-Ebf_eTDscfOYdDROPRmJBXQJG1790_CHzkMf8k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153549747</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meltwater-driven sediment transport dynamics in two contrasting alpine proglacial streams</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Engel, Michael ; Coviello, Velio ; Savi, Sara ; Buter, Anuschka ; Andreoli, Andrea ; Miyata, Shusuke ; Marchetti, Giulia ; Scorpio, Vittoria ; Rathburn, Sara ; Nicholson, Lindsey ; Comiti, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Engel, Michael ; Coviello, Velio ; Savi, Sara ; Buter, Anuschka ; Andreoli, Andrea ; Miyata, Shusuke ; Marchetti, Giulia ; Scorpio, Vittoria ; Rathburn, Sara ; Nicholson, Lindsey ; Comiti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>•We used a tracer-based approach to quantify melt water proportions related to sediment transport at two contrasting Alpine proglacial streams.•Glacier melt was associated with higher bedload concentrations at the debris-covered glacier and much lower concentrations at the clean ice glacier.•Glacier size, presence of debris cover, and substrate were identified as the main drivers of melt dynamics and sediment transport at both glaciers. Subglacial sediments are a large component of the sediment budget of glacierized catchments but insights into the subglacial origin of sediments (bedload, in particular) linked to proglacial runoff dynamics remain scarce. In this study, we use a tracer-based approach to quantify meltwater proportions related to sediment transport at two proglacial streams, draining glaciers (named debris-covered and clean glacier) of different size, aspect and elevation range with contrasting distribution and thickness of debris cover and lithology of the subglacial sediments (i.e., metamorphic vs. sedimentary), in the Sulden/Solda catchment (Italian Alps). Results indicate that the glacier melt component (75 to 80 %) was associated with bedload concentrations of 1 to 10 kg m−3 at the debris-covered glacier and much lower concentrations of 0.01 to 1 kg m−3 at the clean ice glacier. At the seasonal scale, bedload and suspended sediment concentrations at both sites strongly varied with discharge. While daily bedload concentrations varied by up to two orders of magnitude obscured the seasonal development of bedload concentrations at both sites, a clear seasonality for suspended sediment concentrations was found. At the daily scale, the relationship of discharge, bedload, and suspended sediment was more complex because discharge and sediment transport did not always follow the daily variation of air temperature, or similar daily air temperatures resulted in different discharge and sediment transport responses and vice versa. Glacier size, presence of debris cover, and substrate were identified as the main drivers of meltwater dynamics and sediment transport at both glaciers. This study adds further insights into the interplay of meltwater contributions and sediment transport, which are essential to better assess the impact of climate warming on sediment supply in glacierized catchments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131171</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>air ; air temperature ; Alps region ; bedload ; Clean ice ; climate ; Debris cover ; Glacierized catchment ; glaciers ; ice ; lithology ; runoff ; seasonal development ; Sediment transport ; sediments ; snowmelt ; Stable water isotopes ; suspended sediment ; Tracer ; watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2024-05, Vol.635, p.131171, Article 131171</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-b2a75da6c0a468297d21ddaa91622fd69d37e1fc005ce183dc98fd0a72f797163</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0430-7950 ; 0000-0001-8573-0464 ; 0000-0003-3760-285X ; 0000-0001-9840-0165</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Engel, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coviello, Velio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savi, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buter, Anuschka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreoli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyata, Shusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchetti, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scorpio, Vittoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathburn, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comiti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Meltwater-driven sediment transport dynamics in two contrasting alpine proglacial streams</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>•We used a tracer-based approach to quantify melt water proportions related to sediment transport at two contrasting Alpine proglacial streams.•Glacier melt was associated with higher bedload concentrations at the debris-covered glacier and much lower concentrations at the clean ice glacier.•Glacier size, presence of debris cover, and substrate were identified as the main drivers of melt dynamics and sediment transport at both glaciers. Subglacial sediments are a large component of the sediment budget of glacierized catchments but insights into the subglacial origin of sediments (bedload, in particular) linked to proglacial runoff dynamics remain scarce. In this study, we use a tracer-based approach to quantify meltwater proportions related to sediment transport at two proglacial streams, draining glaciers (named debris-covered and clean glacier) of different size, aspect and elevation range with contrasting distribution and thickness of debris cover and lithology of the subglacial sediments (i.e., metamorphic vs. sedimentary), in the Sulden/Solda catchment (Italian Alps). Results indicate that the glacier melt component (75 to 80 %) was associated with bedload concentrations of 1 to 10 kg m−3 at the debris-covered glacier and much lower concentrations of 0.01 to 1 kg m−3 at the clean ice glacier. At the seasonal scale, bedload and suspended sediment concentrations at both sites strongly varied with discharge. While daily bedload concentrations varied by up to two orders of magnitude obscured the seasonal development of bedload concentrations at both sites, a clear seasonality for suspended sediment concentrations was found. At the daily scale, the relationship of discharge, bedload, and suspended sediment was more complex because discharge and sediment transport did not always follow the daily variation of air temperature, or similar daily air temperatures resulted in different discharge and sediment transport responses and vice versa. Glacier size, presence of debris cover, and substrate were identified as the main drivers of meltwater dynamics and sediment transport at both glaciers. This study adds further insights into the interplay of meltwater contributions and sediment transport, which are essential to better assess the impact of climate warming on sediment supply in glacierized catchments.</description><subject>air</subject><subject>air temperature</subject><subject>Alps region</subject><subject>bedload</subject><subject>Clean ice</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>Debris cover</subject><subject>Glacierized catchment</subject><subject>glaciers</subject><subject>ice</subject><subject>lithology</subject><subject>runoff</subject><subject>seasonal development</subject><subject>Sediment transport</subject><subject>sediments</subject><subject>snowmelt</subject><subject>Stable water isotopes</subject><subject>suspended sediment</subject><subject>Tracer</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAQxT2ARCn8CUgeWVL8kcTNhFDFl1TEAgOTddiX4ihxgu226n9PqnTnlhvuvad7P0JuOFtwxsu7ZtH8HGzo24VgIl9wybniZ2TGmBAZL6v8glzG2LBxpMxn5OsN27SHhCGzwe3Q04jWdegTTQF8HPqQqD146JyJ1Hma9j01vR-PMTm_odAOziMdQr9pwThoaUwBoYtX5LyGNuL1ac_J59Pjx-olW78_v64e1hnIkqXsW4AqLJSGQV4uRaWs4NYCVLwUorZlZaVCXhvGCoN8Ka2plrVloEStKsVLOSe3U-74wu8WY9KdiwbbFjz226glL2SRVypXo7SYpCb0MQas9RBcB-GgOdNHfLrRJ3z6iE9P-Ebf_eTDscfOYdDROPRmJBXQJG1790_CHzkMf8k</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Engel, Michael</creator><creator>Coviello, Velio</creator><creator>Savi, Sara</creator><creator>Buter, Anuschka</creator><creator>Andreoli, Andrea</creator><creator>Miyata, Shusuke</creator><creator>Marchetti, Giulia</creator><creator>Scorpio, Vittoria</creator><creator>Rathburn, Sara</creator><creator>Nicholson, Lindsey</creator><creator>Comiti, Francesco</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0430-7950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8573-0464</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3760-285X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9840-0165</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Meltwater-driven sediment transport dynamics in two contrasting alpine proglacial streams</title><author>Engel, Michael ; Coviello, Velio ; Savi, Sara ; Buter, Anuschka ; Andreoli, Andrea ; Miyata, Shusuke ; Marchetti, Giulia ; Scorpio, Vittoria ; Rathburn, Sara ; Nicholson, Lindsey ; Comiti, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-b2a75da6c0a468297d21ddaa91622fd69d37e1fc005ce183dc98fd0a72f797163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>air</topic><topic>air temperature</topic><topic>Alps region</topic><topic>bedload</topic><topic>Clean ice</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>Debris cover</topic><topic>Glacierized catchment</topic><topic>glaciers</topic><topic>ice</topic><topic>lithology</topic><topic>runoff</topic><topic>seasonal development</topic><topic>Sediment transport</topic><topic>sediments</topic><topic>snowmelt</topic><topic>Stable water isotopes</topic><topic>suspended sediment</topic><topic>Tracer</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Engel, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coviello, Velio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savi, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buter, Anuschka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreoli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyata, Shusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchetti, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scorpio, Vittoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathburn, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comiti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Engel, Michael</au><au>Coviello, Velio</au><au>Savi, Sara</au><au>Buter, Anuschka</au><au>Andreoli, Andrea</au><au>Miyata, Shusuke</au><au>Marchetti, Giulia</au><au>Scorpio, Vittoria</au><au>Rathburn, Sara</au><au>Nicholson, Lindsey</au><au>Comiti, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meltwater-driven sediment transport dynamics in two contrasting alpine proglacial streams</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>635</volume><spage>131171</spage><pages>131171-</pages><artnum>131171</artnum><issn>0022-1694</issn><abstract>•We used a tracer-based approach to quantify melt water proportions related to sediment transport at two contrasting Alpine proglacial streams.•Glacier melt was associated with higher bedload concentrations at the debris-covered glacier and much lower concentrations at the clean ice glacier.•Glacier size, presence of debris cover, and substrate were identified as the main drivers of melt dynamics and sediment transport at both glaciers. Subglacial sediments are a large component of the sediment budget of glacierized catchments but insights into the subglacial origin of sediments (bedload, in particular) linked to proglacial runoff dynamics remain scarce. In this study, we use a tracer-based approach to quantify meltwater proportions related to sediment transport at two proglacial streams, draining glaciers (named debris-covered and clean glacier) of different size, aspect and elevation range with contrasting distribution and thickness of debris cover and lithology of the subglacial sediments (i.e., metamorphic vs. sedimentary), in the Sulden/Solda catchment (Italian Alps). Results indicate that the glacier melt component (75 to 80 %) was associated with bedload concentrations of 1 to 10 kg m−3 at the debris-covered glacier and much lower concentrations of 0.01 to 1 kg m−3 at the clean ice glacier. At the seasonal scale, bedload and suspended sediment concentrations at both sites strongly varied with discharge. While daily bedload concentrations varied by up to two orders of magnitude obscured the seasonal development of bedload concentrations at both sites, a clear seasonality for suspended sediment concentrations was found. At the daily scale, the relationship of discharge, bedload, and suspended sediment was more complex because discharge and sediment transport did not always follow the daily variation of air temperature, or similar daily air temperatures resulted in different discharge and sediment transport responses and vice versa. Glacier size, presence of debris cover, and substrate were identified as the main drivers of meltwater dynamics and sediment transport at both glaciers. This study adds further insights into the interplay of meltwater contributions and sediment transport, which are essential to better assess the impact of climate warming on sediment supply in glacierized catchments.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131171</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0430-7950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8573-0464</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3760-285X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9840-0165</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2024-05, Vol.635, p.131171, Article 131171
issn 0022-1694
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhydrol_2024_131171
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects air
air temperature
Alps region
bedload
Clean ice
climate
Debris cover
Glacierized catchment
glaciers
ice
lithology
runoff
seasonal development
Sediment transport
sediments
snowmelt
Stable water isotopes
suspended sediment
Tracer
watersheds
title Meltwater-driven sediment transport dynamics in two contrasting alpine proglacial streams
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T02%3A54%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meltwater-driven%20sediment%20transport%20dynamics%20in%20two%20contrasting%20alpine%20proglacial%20streams&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Engel,%20Michael&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=635&rft.spage=131171&rft.pages=131171-&rft.artnum=131171&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131171&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153549747%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-b2a75da6c0a468297d21ddaa91622fd69d37e1fc005ce183dc98fd0a72f797163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153549747&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true