Loading…

Damage assessment of squat, thin and lightly-reinforced concrete walls by the Park & Ang damage index

Damage progression indexes are widely used to evaluate the performance of structural elements in buildings and bridges subjected to seismic actions. Although the Park & Ang damage index is currently implemented in several computational tools, the index has not been calibrated for squat and thin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Building Engineering 2019-11, Vol.26, p.100921, Article 100921
Main Authors: Carrillo, Julian, Oyarzo-Vera, Claudio, Blandón, Carlos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-cb49173b04687741d8e9077ad9bb317df5563eecc6b35735912df479dac57c333
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-cb49173b04687741d8e9077ad9bb317df5563eecc6b35735912df479dac57c333
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100921
container_title Journal of Building Engineering
container_volume 26
creator Carrillo, Julian
Oyarzo-Vera, Claudio
Blandón, Carlos
description Damage progression indexes are widely used to evaluate the performance of structural elements in buildings and bridges subjected to seismic actions. Although the Park & Ang damage index is currently implemented in several computational tools, the index has not been calibrated for squat and thin reinforced concrete (RC) elements controlled by shear deformations. It has been observed that the equations originally proposed for the Park & Ang damage index are unsuited for these types of structural elements, which are characterized by a failure mode dominated by shear instead of flexural deformations. The index was evaluated in this study for squat, thin and lightly-reinforced concrete walls using experimental data from a program comprising monotonic and reversed-cyclic load testing of 25 RC squat cantilever walls. The experimental program included walls, with and without openings, having height-to-length ratios equal to 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0. Full-scale wall thickness and clear height were 100 mm and 2.4 m, respectively. The specimens were built using three different types of concrete (normal-weight, light-weight and self-consolidating) with nominal compressive strength of 15 MPa. A novel formulation for the parameter β included in the Park & Ang damage index was proposed in this study using key variables of the wall specimens such as web reinforcement ratio and cumulative ductility. Comparison between the computed damage index and crack pattern evolution observed in wall specimens at different damage states demonstrated the ability of the model to numerically assess the damage of the wall specimens. Hence, this new formulation proposed for parameter β leads to a better estimation of damage for this particular type of elements when applying the broadly used Park & Ang damage index. •Park&Ang index has not been calibrated for squat, thin and lightly-reinforced walls.•Park&Ang index was evaluated using experimental data from 25 squat walls.•A novel formulation for the parameter β was proposed in the study.•Computed index was compared with damage observed in walls at three damage states.•New formula for β leads to a better estimate of damage for this type of elements.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100921
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jobe_2019_100921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2352710218315158</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2352710218315158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-cb49173b04687741d8e9077ad9bb317df5563eecc6b35735912df479dac57c333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EEhX0BTj5xIkUL0lcS1yqskqV4ABny8ukdUgdsM3StydVOHDiNKPRfL9mPoTOKJlRQuvLdtb2BmaMUDkMiGT0AE0Yr1ghKGGHf_pjNE2pJYQwWfF5XU4QXOutXgPWKUFKWwgZ9w1O7x86X-C88QHr4HDn15vc7YoIPjR9tOCw7YONkAF_6a5L2OyGbcBPOr7ic7wIa-zGYB8cfJ-io0Z3Caa_9QS93N48L--L1ePdw3KxKiwnJBfWlJIKbkhZz4UoqZuDJEJoJ43hVLimqmoOYG1teCV4JSlzTSmk07YSlnN-gtiYa2OfUoRGvUW_1XGnKFF7V6pVe1dq70qNrgboaoRguOzTQ1TJegjDkz6Czcr1_j_8BzKacfY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Damage assessment of squat, thin and lightly-reinforced concrete walls by the Park &amp; Ang damage index</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Carrillo, Julian ; Oyarzo-Vera, Claudio ; Blandón, Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Julian ; Oyarzo-Vera, Claudio ; Blandón, Carlos</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Damage progression indexes are widely used to evaluate the performance of structural elements in buildings and bridges subjected to seismic actions. Although the Park & Ang damage index is currently implemented in several computational tools, the index has not been calibrated for squat and thin reinforced concrete (RC) elements controlled by shear deformations. It has been observed that the equations originally proposed for the Park & Ang damage index are unsuited for these types of structural elements, which are characterized by a failure mode dominated by shear instead of flexural deformations. The index was evaluated in this study for squat, thin and lightly-reinforced concrete walls using experimental data from a program comprising monotonic and reversed-cyclic load testing of 25 RC squat cantilever walls. The experimental program included walls, with and without openings, having height-to-length ratios equal to 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0. Full-scale wall thickness and clear height were 100 mm and 2.4 m, respectively. The specimens were built using three different types of concrete (normal-weight, light-weight and self-consolidating) with nominal compressive strength of 15 MPa. A novel formulation for the parameter β included in the Park & Ang damage index was proposed in this study using key variables of the wall specimens such as web reinforcement ratio and cumulative ductility. Comparison between the computed damage index and crack pattern evolution observed in wall specimens at different damage states demonstrated the ability of the model to numerically assess the damage of the wall specimens. Hence, this new formulation proposed for parameter β leads to a better estimation of damage for this particular type of elements when applying the broadly used Park & Ang damage index. •Park&Ang index has not been calibrated for squat, thin and lightly-reinforced walls.•Park&Ang index was evaluated using experimental data from 25 squat walls.•A novel formulation for the parameter β was proposed in the study.•Computed index was compared with damage observed in walls at three damage states.•New formula for β leads to a better estimate of damage for this type of elements.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2352-7102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-7102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Concrete wall ; Crack pattern ; Damage index ; Squat wall ; Thin wall</subject><ispartof>Journal of Building Engineering, 2019-11, Vol.26, p.100921, Article 100921</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-cb49173b04687741d8e9077ad9bb317df5563eecc6b35735912df479dac57c333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-cb49173b04687741d8e9077ad9bb317df5563eecc6b35735912df479dac57c333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyarzo-Vera, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blandón, Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Damage assessment of squat, thin and lightly-reinforced concrete walls by the Park &amp; Ang damage index</title><title>Journal of Building Engineering</title><description><![CDATA[Damage progression indexes are widely used to evaluate the performance of structural elements in buildings and bridges subjected to seismic actions. Although the Park & Ang damage index is currently implemented in several computational tools, the index has not been calibrated for squat and thin reinforced concrete (RC) elements controlled by shear deformations. It has been observed that the equations originally proposed for the Park & Ang damage index are unsuited for these types of structural elements, which are characterized by a failure mode dominated by shear instead of flexural deformations. The index was evaluated in this study for squat, thin and lightly-reinforced concrete walls using experimental data from a program comprising monotonic and reversed-cyclic load testing of 25 RC squat cantilever walls. The experimental program included walls, with and without openings, having height-to-length ratios equal to 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0. Full-scale wall thickness and clear height were 100 mm and 2.4 m, respectively. The specimens were built using three different types of concrete (normal-weight, light-weight and self-consolidating) with nominal compressive strength of 15 MPa. A novel formulation for the parameter β included in the Park & Ang damage index was proposed in this study using key variables of the wall specimens such as web reinforcement ratio and cumulative ductility. Comparison between the computed damage index and crack pattern evolution observed in wall specimens at different damage states demonstrated the ability of the model to numerically assess the damage of the wall specimens. Hence, this new formulation proposed for parameter β leads to a better estimation of damage for this particular type of elements when applying the broadly used Park & Ang damage index. •Park&Ang index has not been calibrated for squat, thin and lightly-reinforced walls.•Park&Ang index was evaluated using experimental data from 25 squat walls.•A novel formulation for the parameter β was proposed in the study.•Computed index was compared with damage observed in walls at three damage states.•New formula for β leads to a better estimate of damage for this type of elements.]]></description><subject>Concrete wall</subject><subject>Crack pattern</subject><subject>Damage index</subject><subject>Squat wall</subject><subject>Thin wall</subject><issn>2352-7102</issn><issn>2352-7102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EEhX0BTj5xIkUL0lcS1yqskqV4ABny8ukdUgdsM3StydVOHDiNKPRfL9mPoTOKJlRQuvLdtb2BmaMUDkMiGT0AE0Yr1ghKGGHf_pjNE2pJYQwWfF5XU4QXOutXgPWKUFKWwgZ9w1O7x86X-C88QHr4HDn15vc7YoIPjR9tOCw7YONkAF_6a5L2OyGbcBPOr7ic7wIa-zGYB8cfJ-io0Z3Caa_9QS93N48L--L1ePdw3KxKiwnJBfWlJIKbkhZz4UoqZuDJEJoJ43hVLimqmoOYG1teCV4JSlzTSmk07YSlnN-gtiYa2OfUoRGvUW_1XGnKFF7V6pVe1dq70qNrgboaoRguOzTQ1TJegjDkz6Czcr1_j_8BzKacfY</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Carrillo, Julian</creator><creator>Oyarzo-Vera, Claudio</creator><creator>Blandón, Carlos</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Damage assessment of squat, thin and lightly-reinforced concrete walls by the Park &amp; Ang damage index</title><author>Carrillo, Julian ; Oyarzo-Vera, Claudio ; Blandón, Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-cb49173b04687741d8e9077ad9bb317df5563eecc6b35735912df479dac57c333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Concrete wall</topic><topic>Crack pattern</topic><topic>Damage index</topic><topic>Squat wall</topic><topic>Thin wall</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carrillo, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyarzo-Vera, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blandón, Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Building Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carrillo, Julian</au><au>Oyarzo-Vera, Claudio</au><au>Blandón, Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Damage assessment of squat, thin and lightly-reinforced concrete walls by the Park &amp; Ang damage index</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Building Engineering</jtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><spage>100921</spage><pages>100921-</pages><artnum>100921</artnum><issn>2352-7102</issn><eissn>2352-7102</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Damage progression indexes are widely used to evaluate the performance of structural elements in buildings and bridges subjected to seismic actions. Although the Park & Ang damage index is currently implemented in several computational tools, the index has not been calibrated for squat and thin reinforced concrete (RC) elements controlled by shear deformations. It has been observed that the equations originally proposed for the Park & Ang damage index are unsuited for these types of structural elements, which are characterized by a failure mode dominated by shear instead of flexural deformations. The index was evaluated in this study for squat, thin and lightly-reinforced concrete walls using experimental data from a program comprising monotonic and reversed-cyclic load testing of 25 RC squat cantilever walls. The experimental program included walls, with and without openings, having height-to-length ratios equal to 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0. Full-scale wall thickness and clear height were 100 mm and 2.4 m, respectively. The specimens were built using three different types of concrete (normal-weight, light-weight and self-consolidating) with nominal compressive strength of 15 MPa. A novel formulation for the parameter β included in the Park & Ang damage index was proposed in this study using key variables of the wall specimens such as web reinforcement ratio and cumulative ductility. Comparison between the computed damage index and crack pattern evolution observed in wall specimens at different damage states demonstrated the ability of the model to numerically assess the damage of the wall specimens. Hence, this new formulation proposed for parameter β leads to a better estimation of damage for this particular type of elements when applying the broadly used Park & Ang damage index. •Park&Ang index has not been calibrated for squat, thin and lightly-reinforced walls.•Park&Ang index was evaluated using experimental data from 25 squat walls.•A novel formulation for the parameter β was proposed in the study.•Computed index was compared with damage observed in walls at three damage states.•New formula for β leads to a better estimate of damage for this type of elements.]]></abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100921</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2352-7102
ispartof Journal of Building Engineering, 2019-11, Vol.26, p.100921, Article 100921
issn 2352-7102
2352-7102
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jobe_2019_100921
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Concrete wall
Crack pattern
Damage index
Squat wall
Thin wall
title Damage assessment of squat, thin and lightly-reinforced concrete walls by the Park & Ang damage index
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A19%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Damage%20assessment%20of%20squat,%20thin%20and%20lightly-reinforced%20concrete%20walls%20by%20the%20Park%20&%20Ang%20damage%20index&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Building%20Engineering&rft.au=Carrillo,%20Julian&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=26&rft.spage=100921&rft.pages=100921-&rft.artnum=100921&rft.issn=2352-7102&rft.eissn=2352-7102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100921&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2352710218315158%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-cb49173b04687741d8e9077ad9bb317df5563eecc6b35735912df479dac57c333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true