Loading…

Demand response of district heating using model predictive control to prevent the draught risk of cold window in an office building

Demand response of district heating provides one tool for decreasing cost and emissions in the whole energy system. However, when seeking cost savings and emission reductions, it is also important to consider thermal comfort. Thus, the overall and local thermal comfort of occupants were investigated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Building Engineering 2021-01, Vol.33, p.101855, Article 101855
Main Authors: Wu, Yuxin, Mäki, Aleksi, Jokisalo, Juha, Kosonen, Risto, Kilpeläinen, Simo, Salo, Sonja, Liu, Hong, Li, Baizhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Demand response of district heating provides one tool for decreasing cost and emissions in the whole energy system. However, when seeking cost savings and emission reductions, it is also important to consider thermal comfort. Thus, the overall and local thermal comfort of occupants were investigated during the experimental study while applying the demand response of space heating. Thermal manikin measurements were used to reveal the draught risk of convection flow caused by cold windows. Results show that when the surface temperature of windows was below 15 °C while the thermostat valves of the radiators were closed, the draught risk became unacceptable. The main objective of the simulation with the developed predictive control algorithm (MPC) was to show how much the minimization of draught risk by limiting minimum window surface temperature to 15 °C during decentralized demand response control effects heating energy cost-saving potential. Results show the maximum annual district heat energy cost saving by demand response control without minimization of draught risk is 4.8% and 3.8% with energy-efficient (U = 1.0 W/m2K) or poor (U = 2.6 W/m2K) windows respectively, but the draught risk is high with the poor windows. The minimization of draught risk has an insignificant effect on the cost-saving with the energy-efficient windows, but the cost-saving was reduced to 2.3% and draught risk significantly decreased with the poor windows. Thus, it is necessary to use the window temperature restriction with demand response control of radiator heating to prevent the draught risk of cold poorly insulated windows within the thermal comfort range. •Draught risk became unacceptable when temperature of window was below 15 °C.•DR control reduced energy cost for heating by 3%–5% with different windows.•Simulation shows the draught risk is high in office buildings with the poor windows.•The draught risk significantly decreased with temperature restriction in the poor windows.•Window temperature restriction should be set in DR control to prevent the draught risk.
ISSN:2352-7102
2352-7102
DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101855