Loading…

Detection of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in hair: Validation of GC–MS and LC–MS/MS methods and application to a real case

A gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method were validated for quantifying endogenous and exogenous hair concentrations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB). The GC–MS method is based on overnight extraction of 25mg hair in NaOH at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis 2012-11, Vol.70, p.518-522
Main Authors: Bertol, Elisabetta, Argo, Antonina, Procaccianti, Paolo, Vaiano, Fabio, Di Milia, Maria Grazia, Furlanetto, Sandra, Mari, Francesco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method were validated for quantifying endogenous and exogenous hair concentrations of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB). The GC–MS method is based on overnight extraction of 25mg hair in NaOH at 56°C, liquid/liquid extraction in ethylacetate and trimethylsylil derivatization; analysis is by electron ionization and single ion monitoring of three ions. The LC–MS/MS method entails a rapid digestion of 25mg hair with NaOH at 75°C for 40min, liquid/liquid extraction in ethylacetate and reconstitution of the extract in the LC mobile phase; negative ion electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) analysis are employed for the LC–MS/MS detection. In both cases, GHB-d6 is used as an internal standard. The endogenous amount in “blank” hair are estimated by the standard addition method. Limits of detection are 0.4 and 0.5ng/mg for GC–MS and LC–MS/MS respectively, while the limit of quantification (LOQ) is 0.6ng/mg for both methods; the GC–MS method proved to be linear in the range 1–50ng/mg whereas linearity was demonstrated from 0.6 to 50ng/mg for the LC–MS/MS; imprecision and inaccuracy were always lower than 23% for quality controls samples. The two methods were applied to a real case of a man addicted to GHB; the drug concentration in segments from 17cm hair strand well correlated with self-reported use of GHB in different periods of his life. Performances of the two methods were similar.
ISSN:0731-7085
1873-264X
DOI:10.1016/j.jpba.2012.07.009