Loading…
Specific properties on TiO2 photocatalysis to decompose isopropyl methylphosphonofluoridate and dimethyl methylphosphonate in Gas Phase
•Valorized GB and DMMP were decomposed by TiO2 photocatalysis in the same experimental condition.•The adsorption quantity of GB was 28 times much larger than that of DMMP.•The decomposition rate of GB was 3.3 times faster than that of DMMP.•The TiF bond at the TiO2 photocatalyst deactivated the TiO2...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. A, Chemistry. Chemistry., 2013-07, Vol.264, p.12-17 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Valorized GB and DMMP were decomposed by TiO2 photocatalysis in the same experimental condition.•The adsorption quantity of GB was 28 times much larger than that of DMMP.•The decomposition rate of GB was 3.3 times faster than that of DMMP.•The TiF bond at the TiO2 photocatalyst deactivated the TiO2 photocatalysis.
The specific differences on TiO2 photocatalytic decomposition rates of vaporized isopropyl methylphosphonofluoridate, sarin (GB), rGB as a real Chemical Warfare Agent (CWA) and vaporized dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP), rDMMP as CWA simulant in gas phase have been investigated by Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis in ambient. The concentration of GB molecules adsorbed at the surface of TiO2 in the dark, CGB, was 28 times larger than CDMMP in the dark. The rGB was then 3.3 times faster than the rDMMP. The results were explained by taking into account faster hydrolysis of GB molecules at the surface of TiO2 and the larger diffusion constant of GB in the gas phase than DMMP molecules. The effect of F− adsorption at the surface of TiO2 as fluoridated surface on the TiO2 photocatalysis was also studied. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1010-6030 1873-2666 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.04.012 |