Ceilometer calibration for retrieval of aerosol optical properties

Ceilometers are durable compact backscatter lidars widely used to detect cloud base height. They are also useful for measuring aerosols. We introduced a ceilometer (CL51) for observing dust in a source region in Mongolia. For retrieving aerosol profiles with a backscatter lidar, the molecular backsc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer 2015-03, Vol.153, p.49-56
Main Authors: Jin, Yoshitaka, Kai, Kenji, Kawai, Kei, Nagai, Tomohiro, Sakai, Tetsu, Yamazaki, Akihiro, Uchiyama, Akihiro, Batdorj, Dashdondog, Sugimoto, Nobuo, Nishizawa, Tomoaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aerosol
Ceilometer
Desert dust
Lidar
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Ceilometers are durable compact backscatter lidars widely used to detect cloud base height. They are also useful for measuring aerosols. We introduced a ceilometer (CL51) for observing dust in a source region in Mongolia. For retrieving aerosol profiles with a backscatter lidar, the molecular backscatter signal in the aerosol free heights or system constant of the lidar is required. Although the system constant of the ceilometer is calibrated by the manufacturer, it is not necessarily accurate enough for the aerosol retrieval. We determined a correction factor, which is defined as the ratio of true attenuated backscattering coefficient to the measured attenuated backscattering coefficient, for the CL51 ceilometer using a dual-wavelength Mie-scattering lidar in Tsukuba, Japan before moving the ceilometer to Dalanzadgad, Mongolia. The correction factor determined by minimizing the difference between the ceilometer and lidar backscattering coefficients was approximately 1.2±0.1. Applying the correction to the CL51 signals, the aerosol optical depth (AOD) agreed well with the sky-radiometer AOD during the observation period (13–17 February 2013) in Tsukuba (9×10−3 of mean square error). After moving the ceilometer to Dalanzadgad, however, the AOD observed with the CL51 (calibrated by the correction factor determined in Tsukuba) was approximately 60% of the AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) sun photometer AOD. The possible causes of the lower AOD results are as follows: (1) the limited height range of extinction integration (
ISSN:0022-4073
1879-1352
DOI:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.10.009