Loading…

Does counter-habitual behavior carry psychological costs?

•Desirable counter-habitual behavior does not carry affective or self-regulatory costs.•Behaving in desirable ways is related to better mood and lower fatigue, and mostly unrelated to the use of self-control.•The above is was true for most participants, regardless of their personality trait levels.•...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of research in personality 2021-06, Vol.92, p.104077, Article 104077
Main Authors: Leikas, Sointu, Kuula, Liisa, Pesonen, Anu-Katriina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Desirable counter-habitual behavior does not carry affective or self-regulatory costs.•Behaving in desirable ways is related to better mood and lower fatigue, and mostly unrelated to the use of self-control.•The above is was true for most participants, regardless of their personality trait levels.•Responsible behavior may be an exception to the above described pattern with regards to self-control. Experience sampling studies have shown that people act out of character a lot of the time. These findings have raised the question of potential costs of counter-habitual behavior. The present experience sampling study (N = 242; measurement occasions = 4342) tested, for five behavioral dimensions derived from the Big Five theory, whether self-reported counter-habitual behavior is related to psychological costs in everyday life. The results mostly supported the view that engaging in desirable counter-habitual behaviors is beneficial, though some evidence for counter-habitual costs was found for self-control. Overall, the results suggest that the state-content significance hypothesis better accounts for everyday life behavioral, affective, and self-regulatory processes than the views highlighting the importance of acting according to one’s “true self”.
ISSN:0092-6566
1095-7251
DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104077