Loading…
Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland
Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘agile’, ‘private’ entrants to the market. However, the existing operators can themselves take advantage of market opening opportunities. In this paper we identify and analyse eleven new minor current...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of rail transport planning & management 2019-12, Vol.12, p.100150, Article 100150 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 100150 |
container_title | Journal of rail transport planning & management |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Król, Marcin Taczanowski, Jakub Jarecki, Stefan Kołoś, Arkadiusz |
description | Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘agile’, ‘private’ entrants to the market. However, the existing operators can themselves take advantage of market opening opportunities. In this paper we identify and analyse eleven new minor current examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland. Compared to the previously described short-lived (2009–2015) experience of an extensive and fierce market rivalry in the country (the Interregio case), the profile of these entries is very low and incumbent's reactions very moderate. We show that the limited scale of post-Interregio competition may partly result from regulatory routine. One interesting feature of the researched evidence is that almost all entries to the long-distance commercial market in Poland (including the Interregio case) were made from another market segment (regional public services). Interestingly, by publicly-owned operators. The relatively high number of such entries shows that expansion towards new markets can be a possible line of growth also for publicly-owned railway businesses. Our discussion includes some implications for pro-competitive regulation.
•Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘private’ operators.•However, the ‘old’, publicly-owned operators are not necessarily bound to play their old boring roles of incumbents.•We identify and analyse eleven new examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland.•Almost all market entries were made from another market segment (regional PSOs) – interestingly, by publicly-owned operators.•Expansion towards new markets is a line of growth that is accessible also to publicly-owned railway businesses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2019.100150 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrtpm_2019_100150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2210970619300113</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2210970619300113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpF7DxDyT4kUezYIEqXlIFXcDacsYTcJTYkZ1S9e9JKGLJbGY0umc0OoRcc5ZyxoubNm3DOPSpYLyaNozn7IwshOAsqUqenf_NrLgkqxhbNlWR86zMF2S_29edhe6Y-INDQ_2AQY8-RAraUd1FT-FTdx26D6TWwb6v0Y0xpS94mCIRI_XNTLlEA2CMdNAxzulAg7YdBd8PONrRejfxdOc77cwVuWim27j67Uvy_nD_tnlKtq-Pz5u7bQKSyTGpMQdphAFWoa4LU1ZFtjZSMANFw6Vs8lw3gslaMJRZUet1YyQUFQpYsxKFXBJ5ugvBxxiwUUOwvQ5HxZma5alW_chTszx1kjdRtycKp9e-LAYVwaIDNDYgjMp4-y__DXaIe54</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Król, Marcin ; Taczanowski, Jakub ; Jarecki, Stefan ; Kołoś, Arkadiusz</creator><creatorcontrib>Król, Marcin ; Taczanowski, Jakub ; Jarecki, Stefan ; Kołoś, Arkadiusz</creatorcontrib><description>Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘agile’, ‘private’ entrants to the market. However, the existing operators can themselves take advantage of market opening opportunities. In this paper we identify and analyse eleven new minor current examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland. Compared to the previously described short-lived (2009–2015) experience of an extensive and fierce market rivalry in the country (the Interregio case), the profile of these entries is very low and incumbent's reactions very moderate. We show that the limited scale of post-Interregio competition may partly result from regulatory routine. One interesting feature of the researched evidence is that almost all entries to the long-distance commercial market in Poland (including the Interregio case) were made from another market segment (regional public services). Interestingly, by publicly-owned operators. The relatively high number of such entries shows that expansion towards new markets can be a possible line of growth also for publicly-owned railway businesses. Our discussion includes some implications for pro-competitive regulation.
•Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘private’ operators.•However, the ‘old’, publicly-owned operators are not necessarily bound to play their old boring roles of incumbents.•We identify and analyse eleven new examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland.•Almost all market entries were made from another market segment (regional PSOs) – interestingly, by publicly-owned operators.•Expansion towards new markets is a line of growth that is accessible also to publicly-owned railway businesses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-9706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-9714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2019.100150</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Asymmetric regulation ; Long-distance passenger services ; On-track competition ; Open-access competition ; Public services ; Railways</subject><ispartof>Journal of rail transport planning & management, 2019-12, Vol.12, p.100150, Article 100150</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Król, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taczanowski, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarecki, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kołoś, Arkadiusz</creatorcontrib><title>Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland</title><title>Journal of rail transport planning & management</title><description>Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘agile’, ‘private’ entrants to the market. However, the existing operators can themselves take advantage of market opening opportunities. In this paper we identify and analyse eleven new minor current examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland. Compared to the previously described short-lived (2009–2015) experience of an extensive and fierce market rivalry in the country (the Interregio case), the profile of these entries is very low and incumbent's reactions very moderate. We show that the limited scale of post-Interregio competition may partly result from regulatory routine. One interesting feature of the researched evidence is that almost all entries to the long-distance commercial market in Poland (including the Interregio case) were made from another market segment (regional public services). Interestingly, by publicly-owned operators. The relatively high number of such entries shows that expansion towards new markets can be a possible line of growth also for publicly-owned railway businesses. Our discussion includes some implications for pro-competitive regulation.
•Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘private’ operators.•However, the ‘old’, publicly-owned operators are not necessarily bound to play their old boring roles of incumbents.•We identify and analyse eleven new examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland.•Almost all market entries were made from another market segment (regional PSOs) – interestingly, by publicly-owned operators.•Expansion towards new markets is a line of growth that is accessible also to publicly-owned railway businesses.</description><subject>Asymmetric regulation</subject><subject>Long-distance passenger services</subject><subject>On-track competition</subject><subject>Open-access competition</subject><subject>Public services</subject><subject>Railways</subject><issn>2210-9706</issn><issn>2210-9714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpF7DxDyT4kUezYIEqXlIFXcDacsYTcJTYkZ1S9e9JKGLJbGY0umc0OoRcc5ZyxoubNm3DOPSpYLyaNozn7IwshOAsqUqenf_NrLgkqxhbNlWR86zMF2S_29edhe6Y-INDQ_2AQY8-RAraUd1FT-FTdx26D6TWwb6v0Y0xpS94mCIRI_XNTLlEA2CMdNAxzulAg7YdBd8PONrRejfxdOc77cwVuWim27j67Uvy_nD_tnlKtq-Pz5u7bQKSyTGpMQdphAFWoa4LU1ZFtjZSMANFw6Vs8lw3gslaMJRZUet1YyQUFQpYsxKFXBJ5ugvBxxiwUUOwvQ5HxZma5alW_chTszx1kjdRtycKp9e-LAYVwaIDNDYgjMp4-y__DXaIe54</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Król, Marcin</creator><creator>Taczanowski, Jakub</creator><creator>Jarecki, Stefan</creator><creator>Kołoś, Arkadiusz</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland</title><author>Król, Marcin ; Taczanowski, Jakub ; Jarecki, Stefan ; Kołoś, Arkadiusz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Asymmetric regulation</topic><topic>Long-distance passenger services</topic><topic>On-track competition</topic><topic>Open-access competition</topic><topic>Public services</topic><topic>Railways</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Król, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taczanowski, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarecki, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kołoś, Arkadiusz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of rail transport planning & management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Król, Marcin</au><au>Taczanowski, Jakub</au><au>Jarecki, Stefan</au><au>Kołoś, Arkadiusz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rail transport planning & management</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>100150</spage><pages>100150-</pages><artnum>100150</artnum><issn>2210-9706</issn><eissn>2210-9714</eissn><abstract>Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘agile’, ‘private’ entrants to the market. However, the existing operators can themselves take advantage of market opening opportunities. In this paper we identify and analyse eleven new minor current examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland. Compared to the previously described short-lived (2009–2015) experience of an extensive and fierce market rivalry in the country (the Interregio case), the profile of these entries is very low and incumbent's reactions very moderate. We show that the limited scale of post-Interregio competition may partly result from regulatory routine. One interesting feature of the researched evidence is that almost all entries to the long-distance commercial market in Poland (including the Interregio case) were made from another market segment (regional public services). Interestingly, by publicly-owned operators. The relatively high number of such entries shows that expansion towards new markets can be a possible line of growth also for publicly-owned railway businesses. Our discussion includes some implications for pro-competitive regulation.
•Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘private’ operators.•However, the ‘old’, publicly-owned operators are not necessarily bound to play their old boring roles of incumbents.•We identify and analyse eleven new examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland.•Almost all market entries were made from another market segment (regional PSOs) – interestingly, by publicly-owned operators.•Expansion towards new markets is a line of growth that is accessible also to publicly-owned railway businesses.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jrtpm.2019.100150</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2210-9706 |
ispartof | Journal of rail transport planning & management, 2019-12, Vol.12, p.100150, Article 100150 |
issn | 2210-9706 2210-9714 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrtpm_2019_100150 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Asymmetric regulation Long-distance passenger services On-track competition Open-access competition Public services Railways |
title | Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A48%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Publicly-owned%20operators%20can%20also%20challenge%20incumbents.%20New%20cases%20of%20open-access%20passenger%20rail%20competition%20in%20Poland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rail%20transport%20planning%20&%20management&rft.au=Kr%C3%B3l,%20Marcin&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=100150&rft.pages=100150-&rft.artnum=100150&rft.issn=2210-9706&rft.eissn=2210-9714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2019.100150&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2210970619300113%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |