Loading…

Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland

Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘agile’, ‘private’ entrants to the market. However, the existing operators can themselves take advantage of market opening opportunities. In this paper we identify and analyse eleven new minor current...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of rail transport planning & management 2019-12, Vol.12, p.100150, Article 100150
Main Authors: Król, Marcin, Taczanowski, Jakub, Jarecki, Stefan, Kołoś, Arkadiusz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 100150
container_title Journal of rail transport planning & management
container_volume 12
creator Król, Marcin
Taczanowski, Jakub
Jarecki, Stefan
Kołoś, Arkadiusz
description Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘agile’, ‘private’ entrants to the market. However, the existing operators can themselves take advantage of market opening opportunities. In this paper we identify and analyse eleven new minor current examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland. Compared to the previously described short-lived (2009–2015) experience of an extensive and fierce market rivalry in the country (the Interregio case), the profile of these entries is very low and incumbent's reactions very moderate. We show that the limited scale of post-Interregio competition may partly result from regulatory routine. One interesting feature of the researched evidence is that almost all entries to the long-distance commercial market in Poland (including the Interregio case) were made from another market segment (regional public services). Interestingly, by publicly-owned operators. The relatively high number of such entries shows that expansion towards new markets can be a possible line of growth also for publicly-owned railway businesses. Our discussion includes some implications for pro-competitive regulation. •Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘private’ operators.•However, the ‘old’, publicly-owned operators are not necessarily bound to play their old boring roles of incumbents.•We identify and analyse eleven new examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland.•Almost all market entries were made from another market segment (regional PSOs) – interestingly, by publicly-owned operators.•Expansion towards new markets is a line of growth that is accessible also to publicly-owned railway businesses.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2019.100150
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrtpm_2019_100150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2210970619300113</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2210970619300113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpF7DxDyT4kUezYIEqXlIFXcDacsYTcJTYkZ1S9e9JKGLJbGY0umc0OoRcc5ZyxoubNm3DOPSpYLyaNozn7IwshOAsqUqenf_NrLgkqxhbNlWR86zMF2S_29edhe6Y-INDQ_2AQY8-RAraUd1FT-FTdx26D6TWwb6v0Y0xpS94mCIRI_XNTLlEA2CMdNAxzulAg7YdBd8PONrRejfxdOc77cwVuWim27j67Uvy_nD_tnlKtq-Pz5u7bQKSyTGpMQdphAFWoa4LU1ZFtjZSMANFw6Vs8lw3gslaMJRZUet1YyQUFQpYsxKFXBJ5ugvBxxiwUUOwvQ5HxZma5alW_chTszx1kjdRtycKp9e-LAYVwaIDNDYgjMp4-y__DXaIe54</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Król, Marcin ; Taczanowski, Jakub ; Jarecki, Stefan ; Kołoś, Arkadiusz</creator><creatorcontrib>Król, Marcin ; Taczanowski, Jakub ; Jarecki, Stefan ; Kołoś, Arkadiusz</creatorcontrib><description>Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘agile’, ‘private’ entrants to the market. However, the existing operators can themselves take advantage of market opening opportunities. In this paper we identify and analyse eleven new minor current examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland. Compared to the previously described short-lived (2009–2015) experience of an extensive and fierce market rivalry in the country (the Interregio case), the profile of these entries is very low and incumbent's reactions very moderate. We show that the limited scale of post-Interregio competition may partly result from regulatory routine. One interesting feature of the researched evidence is that almost all entries to the long-distance commercial market in Poland (including the Interregio case) were made from another market segment (regional public services). Interestingly, by publicly-owned operators. The relatively high number of such entries shows that expansion towards new markets can be a possible line of growth also for publicly-owned railway businesses. Our discussion includes some implications for pro-competitive regulation. •Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘private’ operators.•However, the ‘old’, publicly-owned operators are not necessarily bound to play their old boring roles of incumbents.•We identify and analyse eleven new examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland.•Almost all market entries were made from another market segment (regional PSOs) – interestingly, by publicly-owned operators.•Expansion towards new markets is a line of growth that is accessible also to publicly-owned railway businesses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-9706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-9714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2019.100150</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Asymmetric regulation ; Long-distance passenger services ; On-track competition ; Open-access competition ; Public services ; Railways</subject><ispartof>Journal of rail transport planning &amp; management, 2019-12, Vol.12, p.100150, Article 100150</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Król, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taczanowski, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarecki, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kołoś, Arkadiusz</creatorcontrib><title>Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland</title><title>Journal of rail transport planning &amp; management</title><description>Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘agile’, ‘private’ entrants to the market. However, the existing operators can themselves take advantage of market opening opportunities. In this paper we identify and analyse eleven new minor current examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland. Compared to the previously described short-lived (2009–2015) experience of an extensive and fierce market rivalry in the country (the Interregio case), the profile of these entries is very low and incumbent's reactions very moderate. We show that the limited scale of post-Interregio competition may partly result from regulatory routine. One interesting feature of the researched evidence is that almost all entries to the long-distance commercial market in Poland (including the Interregio case) were made from another market segment (regional public services). Interestingly, by publicly-owned operators. The relatively high number of such entries shows that expansion towards new markets can be a possible line of growth also for publicly-owned railway businesses. Our discussion includes some implications for pro-competitive regulation. •Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘private’ operators.•However, the ‘old’, publicly-owned operators are not necessarily bound to play their old boring roles of incumbents.•We identify and analyse eleven new examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland.•Almost all market entries were made from another market segment (regional PSOs) – interestingly, by publicly-owned operators.•Expansion towards new markets is a line of growth that is accessible also to publicly-owned railway businesses.</description><subject>Asymmetric regulation</subject><subject>Long-distance passenger services</subject><subject>On-track competition</subject><subject>Open-access competition</subject><subject>Public services</subject><subject>Railways</subject><issn>2210-9706</issn><issn>2210-9714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElXpF7DxDyT4kUezYIEqXlIFXcDacsYTcJTYkZ1S9e9JKGLJbGY0umc0OoRcc5ZyxoubNm3DOPSpYLyaNozn7IwshOAsqUqenf_NrLgkqxhbNlWR86zMF2S_29edhe6Y-INDQ_2AQY8-RAraUd1FT-FTdx26D6TWwb6v0Y0xpS94mCIRI_XNTLlEA2CMdNAxzulAg7YdBd8PONrRejfxdOc77cwVuWim27j67Uvy_nD_tnlKtq-Pz5u7bQKSyTGpMQdphAFWoa4LU1ZFtjZSMANFw6Vs8lw3gslaMJRZUet1YyQUFQpYsxKFXBJ5ugvBxxiwUUOwvQ5HxZma5alW_chTszx1kjdRtycKp9e-LAYVwaIDNDYgjMp4-y__DXaIe54</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Król, Marcin</creator><creator>Taczanowski, Jakub</creator><creator>Jarecki, Stefan</creator><creator>Kołoś, Arkadiusz</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland</title><author>Król, Marcin ; Taczanowski, Jakub ; Jarecki, Stefan ; Kołoś, Arkadiusz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Asymmetric regulation</topic><topic>Long-distance passenger services</topic><topic>On-track competition</topic><topic>Open-access competition</topic><topic>Public services</topic><topic>Railways</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Król, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taczanowski, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarecki, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kołoś, Arkadiusz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of rail transport planning &amp; management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Król, Marcin</au><au>Taczanowski, Jakub</au><au>Jarecki, Stefan</au><au>Kołoś, Arkadiusz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rail transport planning &amp; management</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>100150</spage><pages>100150-</pages><artnum>100150</artnum><issn>2210-9706</issn><eissn>2210-9714</eissn><abstract>Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘agile’, ‘private’ entrants to the market. However, the existing operators can themselves take advantage of market opening opportunities. In this paper we identify and analyse eleven new minor current examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland. Compared to the previously described short-lived (2009–2015) experience of an extensive and fierce market rivalry in the country (the Interregio case), the profile of these entries is very low and incumbent's reactions very moderate. We show that the limited scale of post-Interregio competition may partly result from regulatory routine. One interesting feature of the researched evidence is that almost all entries to the long-distance commercial market in Poland (including the Interregio case) were made from another market segment (regional public services). Interestingly, by publicly-owned operators. The relatively high number of such entries shows that expansion towards new markets can be a possible line of growth also for publicly-owned railway businesses. Our discussion includes some implications for pro-competitive regulation. •Open-access passenger rail competition in Europe has mostly resulted from activities of the ‘new’, ‘private’ operators.•However, the ‘old’, publicly-owned operators are not necessarily bound to play their old boring roles of incumbents.•We identify and analyse eleven new examples of long-distance open-access competition in Poland.•Almost all market entries were made from another market segment (regional PSOs) – interestingly, by publicly-owned operators.•Expansion towards new markets is a line of growth that is accessible also to publicly-owned railway businesses.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jrtpm.2019.100150</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2210-9706
ispartof Journal of rail transport planning & management, 2019-12, Vol.12, p.100150, Article 100150
issn 2210-9706
2210-9714
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrtpm_2019_100150
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Asymmetric regulation
Long-distance passenger services
On-track competition
Open-access competition
Public services
Railways
title Publicly-owned operators can also challenge incumbents. New cases of open-access passenger rail competition in Poland
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A48%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Publicly-owned%20operators%20can%20also%20challenge%20incumbents.%20New%20cases%20of%20open-access%20passenger%20rail%20competition%20in%20Poland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rail%20transport%20planning%20&%20management&rft.au=Kr%C3%B3l,%20Marcin&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=100150&rft.pages=100150-&rft.artnum=100150&rft.issn=2210-9706&rft.eissn=2210-9714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2019.100150&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2210970619300113%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-be5c3d2dc09eab6d79648d320dc6f133f55af203b20e346ba8fd3c69e2c807e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true