Loading…
Inclined forward osmosis module system for fouling control in sustainable produced water treatment using seawater as draw solution
•High hydraulic performance can be achieved under multi-stage concentration.•Multi-stage concentration provides enough osmotic pressure for FO.•Air sparging provides a means of fouling control for FO in the treatment of PW.•Aeration rate of 0.4 L/min and tilting angle of 30° provides 1.4× flux impro...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of water process engineering 2021-04, Vol.40, p.101752, Article 101752 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •High hydraulic performance can be achieved under multi-stage concentration.•Multi-stage concentration provides enough osmotic pressure for FO.•Air sparging provides a means of fouling control for FO in the treatment of PW.•Aeration rate of 0.4 L/min and tilting angle of 30° provides 1.4× flux improvement.
Produced water (PW) generated from oil and gas production is a threat to the environment if not treated properly. Conventional methods for PW treatment are often accompanied by a series of treatments to fulfill the discharge standard. Forward osmosis (FO) is a promising option due to its high solute retention, less irreversible fouling, low energy footprint and potentially used as a standalone unit. However, FO still suffers from the low flux and fouling when treating highly contaminated feeds. This study investigated fouling control in the FO system for concentrating PW by using seawater as a draw solution (DS). A multi-stage filtration system (via via replenishments of the DS) with an aeration and module inclination for fouling mitigation was proposed to improve concentration factor (CF) and flux. Results showed that the multi-stage concentration offered higher fluxes range of 1.72–15.48−1.72 L/(m2h) (LMH) and four times of CF than the single-stage one with fluxes range of 0.39–9.49 LMH corresponding to CF of 1.75. The aeration was effective to enhance the water flux and suppress the fouling, and showed a significant impact at the rate of 0.4 L/min, reaching flux increment by 11 times at a rate of 1 L/min. The impact of aeration was enhanced by inclining the filtration cell up to 5 times at the inclination angle (θ) of 90° due to the improved contacts of air bubbles with the membrane surface. The contribution of the aeration and cell inclination on the water flux can be explained through the forces acting on moving air bubbles. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2214-7144 2214-7144 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101752 |