Loading…
Impact of heat treatment and high moisture extrusion on the in vitro protein digestibility of sunflower and pea protein ingredients
This study aimed to evaluate the protein quality of sunflower and pea protein and how processing (fermentation, mild heating, and high moisture extrusion) would affect their digestibility. The protein quality was assessed by the amino acid profile (calculated scores) and in vitro protein digestibili...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food science & technology 2024-12, Vol.214, p.117133, Article 117133 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-44f5c62a0ed55b164789097587cb38c4e6ebf3d854b83a6836e0a7aaa0b97f3e3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 117133 |
container_title | Food science & technology |
container_volume | 214 |
creator | Öztürk, Zeynep Lille, Martina Rosa-Sibakov, Natalia Sozer, Nesli |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the protein quality of sunflower and pea protein and how processing (fermentation, mild heating, and high moisture extrusion) would affect their digestibility. The protein quality was assessed by the amino acid profile (calculated scores) and in vitro protein digestibility via the degree of protein hydrolysis (DH) using the INFOGEST digestion model. The amino acid profile indicated that sunflower protein was deficient only in lysine (0.62) and leucine (0.86), while pea protein lacked tryptophan (0.83) and sulfur-containing amino acids (0.96). The blend of these materials (1:1) provided a complete amino acid profile reaching a score above 1 for all the essential ones. Fermentation and blending did not have a significant impact of the protein digestibility of the raw materials. The DH of sunflower protein concentrate increased from 33.6 to 46.9% (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117133 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lwt_2024_117133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0023643824014166</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0023643824014166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-44f5c62a0ed55b164789097587cb38c4e6ebf3d854b83a6836e0a7aaa0b97f3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRb0AiVL4AHb-gQS_krhihSoelSqxgbXlOJPGVRJHttvSNT-OSxFLrJFHI829c3UQuqMkp4SW99u8P8ScESZySivK-QWaEcJ4Vgour9B1CFuSnmByhr5Ww6RNxK7FHeiIo0__AGPEemxwZzcdHpwNcecBw2f0u2DdiFPFDrAd8d5G7_DkXYQ0NXYDIdra9jYeT55hN7a9O4D_sZtA_63aceOhselSuEGXre4D3P72Ofp4fnpfvmbrt5fV8nGdGcZYzIRoC1MyTaApipqWopILsqgKWZmaSyOghLrljSxELbkuJS-B6EprTepF1XLgc0TPvsa7EDy0avJ20P6oKFEncmqrEjl1IqfO5JLm4ayBFGxvwatgUmiTonswUTXO_qP-BiETfCo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of heat treatment and high moisture extrusion on the in vitro protein digestibility of sunflower and pea protein ingredients</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Öztürk, Zeynep ; Lille, Martina ; Rosa-Sibakov, Natalia ; Sozer, Nesli</creator><creatorcontrib>Öztürk, Zeynep ; Lille, Martina ; Rosa-Sibakov, Natalia ; Sozer, Nesli</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate the protein quality of sunflower and pea protein and how processing (fermentation, mild heating, and high moisture extrusion) would affect their digestibility. The protein quality was assessed by the amino acid profile (calculated scores) and in vitro protein digestibility via the degree of protein hydrolysis (DH) using the INFOGEST digestion model. The amino acid profile indicated that sunflower protein was deficient only in lysine (0.62) and leucine (0.86), while pea protein lacked tryptophan (0.83) and sulfur-containing amino acids (0.96). The blend of these materials (1:1) provided a complete amino acid profile reaching a score above 1 for all the essential ones. Fermentation and blending did not have a significant impact of the protein digestibility of the raw materials. The DH of sunflower protein concentrate increased from 33.6 to 46.9% (p < 0.05) after mild heat treatment (15% solids, 90 °C, 15 min) and up to 52.8% (p < 0.05) after high-moisture extrusion. Differently, the digestibility of pea protein or the blends was not affected by any of the heat treatments. The extruded sunflower protein had a similar DH than the beef reference (47.5%) and mixing beef with plant-based ingredients did not affect the DH. These results highlight the potential of sunflower as good protein source, especially when blended with pea protein or extruded into meat analogs.
•Sunflower and pea protein blend offers a complete essential amino acid profile.•Mild heating and extrusion enhance sunflower protein digestibility in 13–19%.•Processing did not significantly affect pea protein digestibility.•Extruded sunflower protein shows similar digestibility to beef (48%).•Sunflower protein shows potential as a plant-based meat analog.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-6438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Extrusion ; In vitro protein digestibility ; INFOGEST ; Meat analogs ; Plant-based proteins</subject><ispartof>Food science & technology, 2024-12, Vol.214, p.117133, Article 117133</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-44f5c62a0ed55b164789097587cb38c4e6ebf3d854b83a6836e0a7aaa0b97f3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6002-7262 ; 0000-0002-8819-8650</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Öztürk, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lille, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa-Sibakov, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sozer, Nesli</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of heat treatment and high moisture extrusion on the in vitro protein digestibility of sunflower and pea protein ingredients</title><title>Food science & technology</title><description>This study aimed to evaluate the protein quality of sunflower and pea protein and how processing (fermentation, mild heating, and high moisture extrusion) would affect their digestibility. The protein quality was assessed by the amino acid profile (calculated scores) and in vitro protein digestibility via the degree of protein hydrolysis (DH) using the INFOGEST digestion model. The amino acid profile indicated that sunflower protein was deficient only in lysine (0.62) and leucine (0.86), while pea protein lacked tryptophan (0.83) and sulfur-containing amino acids (0.96). The blend of these materials (1:1) provided a complete amino acid profile reaching a score above 1 for all the essential ones. Fermentation and blending did not have a significant impact of the protein digestibility of the raw materials. The DH of sunflower protein concentrate increased from 33.6 to 46.9% (p < 0.05) after mild heat treatment (15% solids, 90 °C, 15 min) and up to 52.8% (p < 0.05) after high-moisture extrusion. Differently, the digestibility of pea protein or the blends was not affected by any of the heat treatments. The extruded sunflower protein had a similar DH than the beef reference (47.5%) and mixing beef with plant-based ingredients did not affect the DH. These results highlight the potential of sunflower as good protein source, especially when blended with pea protein or extruded into meat analogs.
•Sunflower and pea protein blend offers a complete essential amino acid profile.•Mild heating and extrusion enhance sunflower protein digestibility in 13–19%.•Processing did not significantly affect pea protein digestibility.•Extruded sunflower protein shows similar digestibility to beef (48%).•Sunflower protein shows potential as a plant-based meat analog.</description><subject>Extrusion</subject><subject>In vitro protein digestibility</subject><subject>INFOGEST</subject><subject>Meat analogs</subject><subject>Plant-based proteins</subject><issn>0023-6438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRb0AiVL4AHb-gQS_krhihSoelSqxgbXlOJPGVRJHttvSNT-OSxFLrJFHI829c3UQuqMkp4SW99u8P8ScESZySivK-QWaEcJ4Vgour9B1CFuSnmByhr5Ww6RNxK7FHeiIo0__AGPEemxwZzcdHpwNcecBw2f0u2DdiFPFDrAd8d5G7_DkXYQ0NXYDIdra9jYeT55hN7a9O4D_sZtA_63aceOhselSuEGXre4D3P72Ofp4fnpfvmbrt5fV8nGdGcZYzIRoC1MyTaApipqWopILsqgKWZmaSyOghLrljSxELbkuJS-B6EprTepF1XLgc0TPvsa7EDy0avJ20P6oKFEncmqrEjl1IqfO5JLm4ayBFGxvwatgUmiTonswUTXO_qP-BiETfCo</recordid><startdate>20241215</startdate><enddate>20241215</enddate><creator>Öztürk, Zeynep</creator><creator>Lille, Martina</creator><creator>Rosa-Sibakov, Natalia</creator><creator>Sozer, Nesli</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6002-7262</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8819-8650</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241215</creationdate><title>Impact of heat treatment and high moisture extrusion on the in vitro protein digestibility of sunflower and pea protein ingredients</title><author>Öztürk, Zeynep ; Lille, Martina ; Rosa-Sibakov, Natalia ; Sozer, Nesli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-44f5c62a0ed55b164789097587cb38c4e6ebf3d854b83a6836e0a7aaa0b97f3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Extrusion</topic><topic>In vitro protein digestibility</topic><topic>INFOGEST</topic><topic>Meat analogs</topic><topic>Plant-based proteins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Öztürk, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lille, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa-Sibakov, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sozer, Nesli</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Food science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Öztürk, Zeynep</au><au>Lille, Martina</au><au>Rosa-Sibakov, Natalia</au><au>Sozer, Nesli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of heat treatment and high moisture extrusion on the in vitro protein digestibility of sunflower and pea protein ingredients</atitle><jtitle>Food science & technology</jtitle><date>2024-12-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>214</volume><spage>117133</spage><pages>117133-</pages><artnum>117133</artnum><issn>0023-6438</issn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the protein quality of sunflower and pea protein and how processing (fermentation, mild heating, and high moisture extrusion) would affect their digestibility. The protein quality was assessed by the amino acid profile (calculated scores) and in vitro protein digestibility via the degree of protein hydrolysis (DH) using the INFOGEST digestion model. The amino acid profile indicated that sunflower protein was deficient only in lysine (0.62) and leucine (0.86), while pea protein lacked tryptophan (0.83) and sulfur-containing amino acids (0.96). The blend of these materials (1:1) provided a complete amino acid profile reaching a score above 1 for all the essential ones. Fermentation and blending did not have a significant impact of the protein digestibility of the raw materials. The DH of sunflower protein concentrate increased from 33.6 to 46.9% (p < 0.05) after mild heat treatment (15% solids, 90 °C, 15 min) and up to 52.8% (p < 0.05) after high-moisture extrusion. Differently, the digestibility of pea protein or the blends was not affected by any of the heat treatments. The extruded sunflower protein had a similar DH than the beef reference (47.5%) and mixing beef with plant-based ingredients did not affect the DH. These results highlight the potential of sunflower as good protein source, especially when blended with pea protein or extruded into meat analogs.
•Sunflower and pea protein blend offers a complete essential amino acid profile.•Mild heating and extrusion enhance sunflower protein digestibility in 13–19%.•Processing did not significantly affect pea protein digestibility.•Extruded sunflower protein shows similar digestibility to beef (48%).•Sunflower protein shows potential as a plant-based meat analog.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117133</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6002-7262</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8819-8650</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-6438 |
ispartof | Food science & technology, 2024-12, Vol.214, p.117133, Article 117133 |
issn | 0023-6438 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lwt_2024_117133 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Extrusion In vitro protein digestibility INFOGEST Meat analogs Plant-based proteins |
title | Impact of heat treatment and high moisture extrusion on the in vitro protein digestibility of sunflower and pea protein ingredients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T07%3A03%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20heat%20treatment%20and%20high%20moisture%20extrusion%20on%20the%20in%20vitro%20protein%20digestibility%20of%20sunflower%20and%20pea%20protein%20ingredients&rft.jtitle=Food%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=%C3%96zt%C3%BCrk,%20Zeynep&rft.date=2024-12-15&rft.volume=214&rft.spage=117133&rft.pages=117133-&rft.artnum=117133&rft.issn=0023-6438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117133&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0023643824014166%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-44f5c62a0ed55b164789097587cb38c4e6ebf3d854b83a6836e0a7aaa0b97f3e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |