Loading…

Lithofacies-dependent pore-throat radii and reservoir properties in the Lower Triassic Montney Formation, Puskwaskau Field, Alberta

The reservoir quality of the Lower Triassic (Induan-Olenekian) Montney Formation of the Puskwaskau Field is assessed from two cored intervals. Four lithofacies are identified in the present study: these are defined by their detailed sedimentological characteristics. Lithofacies 1 (L-1) is composed o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine and petroleum geology 2021-09, Vol.131, p.105157, Article 105157
Main Authors: Feng, Chenyang, Melnyk, Scott, Ross, Cole, Shanley, Keith, Zonneveld, John-Paul, Gingras, Murray K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-2bbb76e337f9a1a9df6b5619978875065c2fc7506bc9ea3c24a47d05df114d083
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-2bbb76e337f9a1a9df6b5619978875065c2fc7506bc9ea3c24a47d05df114d083
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105157
container_title Marine and petroleum geology
container_volume 131
creator Feng, Chenyang
Melnyk, Scott
Ross, Cole
Shanley, Keith
Zonneveld, John-Paul
Gingras, Murray K.
description The reservoir quality of the Lower Triassic (Induan-Olenekian) Montney Formation of the Puskwaskau Field is assessed from two cored intervals. Four lithofacies are identified in the present study: these are defined by their detailed sedimentological characteristics. Lithofacies 1 (L-1) is composed of interlaminated bituminous very fine-to medium-grained siltstone and dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 2 (L-2) consists of interbedded dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone and bituminous very fine-to medium-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 3 (L-3) is dominated by bitumen-stained dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 4 (L-4) is characterized by dense, dolomitic coarse-grained siltstone to very fine-grained sandstone. Sediments within the study area are interpreted to have been deposited within a wave-to storm-influenced shoreface and offshore transition zone, comprising conformable progradational successions. The reservoir quality of these deposits is evaluated by comparing reservoir characteristics of each lithofacies. Analyzed properties include porosity, permeability, pore throat radius, clay content and cementation. Winland plots are used to show the predicted pore-throat diameters of lithofacies based on measured permeability (to air). The reservoir quality of L-1 is poor, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.10 to 0.45 μm (micropores). The reservoir quality of L-2 is considered fair, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.11 to 0.94 μm (micro- and mesopores). L-3 has the best reservoir quality in this study, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.20 to 3.01 μm (mesopores). The reservoir quality of L-4 is considered poor due to pervasive dolomite cementation. Pore-throat radii for L-4 range from 0.17 to 0.25 μm (micropores). The range of values observed within each lithofacies effectively constrains the reservoir characteristics and demonstrate the correspondence of lithofacies classification to reservoir quality in this producing field. •Four lithofacies identified comprising a conformable shoaling-upwards sequence.•Pore-throat radii estimated by Winland's equation are correlated with lithofacies.•Lithofacies can be used to predict reservoir properties of the Montney Formation at Puskwaskau Field.•Dolomite and ferroan dolomite cementation are the most common factors reducing reservoir quality.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105157
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_marpetgeo_2021_105157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264817221002609</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0264817221002609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-2bbb76e337f9a1a9df6b5619978875065c2fc7506bc9ea3c24a47d05df114d083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQAC0EEqXwDfgDmmLHSZwcq4oCUhAcytly7A11H3G0Nq165sdJVcSV065WmtFqCLnnbMoZLx7W053GHuIn-GnKUj5cc57LCzLipRRJxqS4JCOWFllScplek5sQ1owxWTE-It-1iyvfauMgJBZ66Cx0kfYeIYkr9DpS1NY5qjtLEQLg3jukPfoeMA4QdR2NK6C1PwDSJTodgjP01XexgyNdeNzp6Hw3oe9fYXPQYaO_6MLB1k7obNsMEn1Lrlq9DXD3O8fkY_G4nD8n9dvTy3xWJ1qIMiZp0zSyACFkW2muK9sWTV7wqpJlKXNW5CZtzWlpTAVamDTTmbQsty3nmWWlGBN59hr0ISC0qkc3xDsqztSppVqrv5bq1FKdWw7k7EzC8N7eAaowBOsMWIdgorLe_ev4ASUPhJ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lithofacies-dependent pore-throat radii and reservoir properties in the Lower Triassic Montney Formation, Puskwaskau Field, Alberta</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Feng, Chenyang ; Melnyk, Scott ; Ross, Cole ; Shanley, Keith ; Zonneveld, John-Paul ; Gingras, Murray K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Feng, Chenyang ; Melnyk, Scott ; Ross, Cole ; Shanley, Keith ; Zonneveld, John-Paul ; Gingras, Murray K.</creatorcontrib><description>The reservoir quality of the Lower Triassic (Induan-Olenekian) Montney Formation of the Puskwaskau Field is assessed from two cored intervals. Four lithofacies are identified in the present study: these are defined by their detailed sedimentological characteristics. Lithofacies 1 (L-1) is composed of interlaminated bituminous very fine-to medium-grained siltstone and dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 2 (L-2) consists of interbedded dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone and bituminous very fine-to medium-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 3 (L-3) is dominated by bitumen-stained dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 4 (L-4) is characterized by dense, dolomitic coarse-grained siltstone to very fine-grained sandstone. Sediments within the study area are interpreted to have been deposited within a wave-to storm-influenced shoreface and offshore transition zone, comprising conformable progradational successions. The reservoir quality of these deposits is evaluated by comparing reservoir characteristics of each lithofacies. Analyzed properties include porosity, permeability, pore throat radius, clay content and cementation. Winland plots are used to show the predicted pore-throat diameters of lithofacies based on measured permeability (to air). The reservoir quality of L-1 is poor, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.10 to 0.45 μm (micropores). The reservoir quality of L-2 is considered fair, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.11 to 0.94 μm (micro- and mesopores). L-3 has the best reservoir quality in this study, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.20 to 3.01 μm (mesopores). The reservoir quality of L-4 is considered poor due to pervasive dolomite cementation. Pore-throat radii for L-4 range from 0.17 to 0.25 μm (micropores). The range of values observed within each lithofacies effectively constrains the reservoir characteristics and demonstrate the correspondence of lithofacies classification to reservoir quality in this producing field. •Four lithofacies identified comprising a conformable shoaling-upwards sequence.•Pore-throat radii estimated by Winland's equation are correlated with lithofacies.•Lithofacies can be used to predict reservoir properties of the Montney Formation at Puskwaskau Field.•Dolomite and ferroan dolomite cementation are the most common factors reducing reservoir quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bioturbation ; Lithofacies ; Montney formation ; Permeability ; Pore-throat radius ; Porosity ; Winland's equation</subject><ispartof>Marine and petroleum geology, 2021-09, Vol.131, p.105157, Article 105157</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-2bbb76e337f9a1a9df6b5619978875065c2fc7506bc9ea3c24a47d05df114d083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-2bbb76e337f9a1a9df6b5619978875065c2fc7506bc9ea3c24a47d05df114d083</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2281-2627 ; 0000-0003-2882-4653</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feng, Chenyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melnyk, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Cole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanley, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zonneveld, John-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gingras, Murray K.</creatorcontrib><title>Lithofacies-dependent pore-throat radii and reservoir properties in the Lower Triassic Montney Formation, Puskwaskau Field, Alberta</title><title>Marine and petroleum geology</title><description>The reservoir quality of the Lower Triassic (Induan-Olenekian) Montney Formation of the Puskwaskau Field is assessed from two cored intervals. Four lithofacies are identified in the present study: these are defined by their detailed sedimentological characteristics. Lithofacies 1 (L-1) is composed of interlaminated bituminous very fine-to medium-grained siltstone and dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 2 (L-2) consists of interbedded dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone and bituminous very fine-to medium-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 3 (L-3) is dominated by bitumen-stained dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 4 (L-4) is characterized by dense, dolomitic coarse-grained siltstone to very fine-grained sandstone. Sediments within the study area are interpreted to have been deposited within a wave-to storm-influenced shoreface and offshore transition zone, comprising conformable progradational successions. The reservoir quality of these deposits is evaluated by comparing reservoir characteristics of each lithofacies. Analyzed properties include porosity, permeability, pore throat radius, clay content and cementation. Winland plots are used to show the predicted pore-throat diameters of lithofacies based on measured permeability (to air). The reservoir quality of L-1 is poor, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.10 to 0.45 μm (micropores). The reservoir quality of L-2 is considered fair, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.11 to 0.94 μm (micro- and mesopores). L-3 has the best reservoir quality in this study, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.20 to 3.01 μm (mesopores). The reservoir quality of L-4 is considered poor due to pervasive dolomite cementation. Pore-throat radii for L-4 range from 0.17 to 0.25 μm (micropores). The range of values observed within each lithofacies effectively constrains the reservoir characteristics and demonstrate the correspondence of lithofacies classification to reservoir quality in this producing field. •Four lithofacies identified comprising a conformable shoaling-upwards sequence.•Pore-throat radii estimated by Winland's equation are correlated with lithofacies.•Lithofacies can be used to predict reservoir properties of the Montney Formation at Puskwaskau Field.•Dolomite and ferroan dolomite cementation are the most common factors reducing reservoir quality.</description><subject>Bioturbation</subject><subject>Lithofacies</subject><subject>Montney formation</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Pore-throat radius</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Winland's equation</subject><issn>0264-8172</issn><issn>1873-4073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQAC0EEqXwDfgDmmLHSZwcq4oCUhAcytly7A11H3G0Nq165sdJVcSV065WmtFqCLnnbMoZLx7W053GHuIn-GnKUj5cc57LCzLipRRJxqS4JCOWFllScplek5sQ1owxWTE-It-1iyvfauMgJBZ66Cx0kfYeIYkr9DpS1NY5qjtLEQLg3jukPfoeMA4QdR2NK6C1PwDSJTodgjP01XexgyNdeNzp6Hw3oe9fYXPQYaO_6MLB1k7obNsMEn1Lrlq9DXD3O8fkY_G4nD8n9dvTy3xWJ1qIMiZp0zSyACFkW2muK9sWTV7wqpJlKXNW5CZtzWlpTAVamDTTmbQsty3nmWWlGBN59hr0ISC0qkc3xDsqztSppVqrv5bq1FKdWw7k7EzC8N7eAaowBOsMWIdgorLe_ev4ASUPhJ4</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Feng, Chenyang</creator><creator>Melnyk, Scott</creator><creator>Ross, Cole</creator><creator>Shanley, Keith</creator><creator>Zonneveld, John-Paul</creator><creator>Gingras, Murray K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-2627</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2882-4653</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Lithofacies-dependent pore-throat radii and reservoir properties in the Lower Triassic Montney Formation, Puskwaskau Field, Alberta</title><author>Feng, Chenyang ; Melnyk, Scott ; Ross, Cole ; Shanley, Keith ; Zonneveld, John-Paul ; Gingras, Murray K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-2bbb76e337f9a1a9df6b5619978875065c2fc7506bc9ea3c24a47d05df114d083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bioturbation</topic><topic>Lithofacies</topic><topic>Montney formation</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Pore-throat radius</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Winland's equation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feng, Chenyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melnyk, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Cole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanley, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zonneveld, John-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gingras, Murray K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Marine and petroleum geology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feng, Chenyang</au><au>Melnyk, Scott</au><au>Ross, Cole</au><au>Shanley, Keith</au><au>Zonneveld, John-Paul</au><au>Gingras, Murray K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lithofacies-dependent pore-throat radii and reservoir properties in the Lower Triassic Montney Formation, Puskwaskau Field, Alberta</atitle><jtitle>Marine and petroleum geology</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>131</volume><spage>105157</spage><pages>105157-</pages><artnum>105157</artnum><issn>0264-8172</issn><eissn>1873-4073</eissn><abstract>The reservoir quality of the Lower Triassic (Induan-Olenekian) Montney Formation of the Puskwaskau Field is assessed from two cored intervals. Four lithofacies are identified in the present study: these are defined by their detailed sedimentological characteristics. Lithofacies 1 (L-1) is composed of interlaminated bituminous very fine-to medium-grained siltstone and dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 2 (L-2) consists of interbedded dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone and bituminous very fine-to medium-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 3 (L-3) is dominated by bitumen-stained dolomitic medium-to coarse-grained siltstone. Lithofacies 4 (L-4) is characterized by dense, dolomitic coarse-grained siltstone to very fine-grained sandstone. Sediments within the study area are interpreted to have been deposited within a wave-to storm-influenced shoreface and offshore transition zone, comprising conformable progradational successions. The reservoir quality of these deposits is evaluated by comparing reservoir characteristics of each lithofacies. Analyzed properties include porosity, permeability, pore throat radius, clay content and cementation. Winland plots are used to show the predicted pore-throat diameters of lithofacies based on measured permeability (to air). The reservoir quality of L-1 is poor, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.10 to 0.45 μm (micropores). The reservoir quality of L-2 is considered fair, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.11 to 0.94 μm (micro- and mesopores). L-3 has the best reservoir quality in this study, with pore-throat radii ranging from 0.20 to 3.01 μm (mesopores). The reservoir quality of L-4 is considered poor due to pervasive dolomite cementation. Pore-throat radii for L-4 range from 0.17 to 0.25 μm (micropores). The range of values observed within each lithofacies effectively constrains the reservoir characteristics and demonstrate the correspondence of lithofacies classification to reservoir quality in this producing field. •Four lithofacies identified comprising a conformable shoaling-upwards sequence.•Pore-throat radii estimated by Winland's equation are correlated with lithofacies.•Lithofacies can be used to predict reservoir properties of the Montney Formation at Puskwaskau Field.•Dolomite and ferroan dolomite cementation are the most common factors reducing reservoir quality.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105157</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-2627</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2882-4653</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8172
ispartof Marine and petroleum geology, 2021-09, Vol.131, p.105157, Article 105157
issn 0264-8172
1873-4073
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_marpetgeo_2021_105157
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Bioturbation
Lithofacies
Montney formation
Permeability
Pore-throat radius
Porosity
Winland's equation
title Lithofacies-dependent pore-throat radii and reservoir properties in the Lower Triassic Montney Formation, Puskwaskau Field, Alberta
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A06%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lithofacies-dependent%20pore-throat%20radii%20and%20reservoir%20properties%20in%20the%20Lower%20Triassic%20Montney%20Formation,%20Puskwaskau%20Field,%20Alberta&rft.jtitle=Marine%20and%20petroleum%20geology&rft.au=Feng,%20Chenyang&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=131&rft.spage=105157&rft.pages=105157-&rft.artnum=105157&rft.issn=0264-8172&rft.eissn=1873-4073&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105157&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0264817221002609%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-2bbb76e337f9a1a9df6b5619978875065c2fc7506bc9ea3c24a47d05df114d083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true