Loading…

Nb2O5 hole blocking layer for hysteresis-free perovskite solar cells

Perovskite solar cells have attracted attention due its high conversion efficiency and low cost. In this work, Nb2O5 is used as an alternative compact hole blocking layer in conjunction with mesoporous TiO2 and CH3NH3PbI3 in perovskite solar cells. The influence of Nb2O5 layer thickness was studied...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials letters 2016-10, Vol.181, p.103-107
Main Authors: Fernandes, Silvia L., Véron, Anna C., Neto, Nilton F.A., Nüesch, Frank A., Dias da Silva, José H., Zaghete, Maria A., Graeff, Carlos F. de O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Perovskite solar cells have attracted attention due its high conversion efficiency and low cost. In this work, Nb2O5 is used as an alternative compact hole blocking layer in conjunction with mesoporous TiO2 and CH3NH3PbI3 in perovskite solar cells. The influence of Nb2O5 layer thickness was studied and it was found to strongly influence the J-V hysteresis of the cells. Devices constructed with 50nm Nb2O5 have small or undetectable hysteresis, which becomes detectable and increases with increasing Nb2O5 layer thickness. For the best device, energy conversion efficiency of up to 12%, short-circuit currents of 17mA/cm2 and fill factors of 74% were found. These parameters are comparable to the best performance of similar devices where the compact layer is TiO2. In addition, the use of Nb2O5 improved the stability of the solar cells under illumination. These improvements are attributed to a better extraction of photogenerated electrons in the perovskite layer. •Nb2O5 was successfully used as hole blocking layer in perovskite solar cells.•The influence of the thickness of the Nb2O5 was studied.•Devices constructed with 50nm Nb2O5 have undetectable hysteresis.
ISSN:0167-577X
1873-4979
DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2016.06.018