Loading…
A PZT active sensing method for monitoring prestressing force based on the ultrasonic reflection coefficient
•A PZT active sensing method for monitoring prestressing force is proposed.•A relationship model between the signal received energy and loading force is established.•The model fitting performance is good.•The method can overcome the low signal-to-noise ratio issue.•The method is simple and easy to i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation 2024-03, Vol.228, p.114348, Article 114348 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •A PZT active sensing method for monitoring prestressing force is proposed.•A relationship model between the signal received energy and loading force is established.•The model fitting performance is good.•The method can overcome the low signal-to-noise ratio issue.•The method is simple and easy to implement without additional algorithms.
Prestress monitoring is key to ensuring the safety and longevity of post-tensioned prestressed structures. A new method of prestress monitoring, based on piezoceramic transducers, is proposed. Compared to traditional ultrasonic detection, we utilize piezoelectric (PZT) active sensing monitoring, eliminating the need for a specialized ultrasonic probe. First, a relationship model between the signal received energy and loading force is established based on the principle of ultrasonic reflection coefficient at the contact interface. On this basis, we overcome the low signal-to-noise ratio issue associated with the traditional method by employing the time reversal (TR) method. Next, the model parameters were fitted using experimental data. The values of the fitting evaluation metrics, SSE and RMSE, tend to be close to 0, while the R-squared value tends to be close to 1. This indicates the reliability of the model. Finally, the prestressing force validation tests are conducted through unloading tests. The average relative error between the measured and actual values across different paths ranges from 6.85% at the minimum to 15.61% at the maximum. Since the method is related to the proximity of the interface contact, it can be applied in other areas of civil engineering, such as assessing the adhesive strength of composite structures, crack development, and detecting axial stress. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0263-2241 1873-412X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114348 |