Loading…

Deconfounded recommendation via causal intervention

Traditional recommenders suffer from hidden confounding factors, leading to the spurious correlations between user/item profiles and user preference prediction, i.e., the confounding bias issue. Most works resort to only one confounding bias, which greatly block their applications on recommendations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neurocomputing (Amsterdam) 2023-04, Vol.529, p.128-139
Main Authors: Yu, Dianer, Li, Qian, Wang, Xiangmeng, Xu, Guandong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Traditional recommenders suffer from hidden confounding factors, leading to the spurious correlations between user/item profiles and user preference prediction, i.e., the confounding bias issue. Most works resort to only one confounding bias, which greatly block their applications on recommendations with mixture confounder, i.e., more than one bias. It is therefore of practical demand to empower the recommender with the capability of debiasing different biases from data. Moreover, the positive effect of bias is neglected in most previous works. We argue that confounding bias is actually beneficial for capturing users’ preferences in some recommendation scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel deconfounded causal learning method called GCRec (Graph Causal Recommendetion) to debias two confounders: social network confounder and item group confounder. We employ Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to aggregate user-user connections for social networks and user-item interactions for item groups in order to learn high-order representations that can efficiently debias these two confounders from a causal view. In the inference stage, we use symmetric Kullback–Leibler divergence to measure the user preference drift. If the divergence is large, we perform the causal intervention to alleviate the bias amplification caused by confounders on user preferences. Otherwise, we incorporate the user preferences that can potentially deliver a positive effect on favoring recommendation performance. Extensive experiments are conducted on two benchmark datasets to verify that GCRec outperforms state-of-the-art methods and achieves robust recommendations.
ISSN:0925-2312
1872-8286
DOI:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.01.089