Cognitive effects of subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation in rats

• Published in: Neurobiology of learning and memory 2017-07, Vol.142 (Pt B), p.190-199
• Main Authors: Klarer, Melanie, Weber-Stadlbauer, Ulrike, Arnold, Myrtha, Langhans, Wolfgang, Meyer, Urs
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdomen - innervation; Afferent Pathways - physiology; Afferent Pathways - surgery; Animals; Behavior, Animal - physiology; Cognitive flexibility; Male; Memory, Short-Term - physiology; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology; Recognition memory; Reversal learning; Reversal Learning - physiology; Vagus nerve; Vagus Nerve - physiology; Vagus Nerve - surgery; Working memory
• ISSN: 1074-7427; 1095-9564
• DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.05.006

•Abdominal vagal deafferentation facilitates positively motivated reversal learning.•Abdominal vagal deafferentation does not affect object recognition memory.•Abdominal vagal deafferentation does not affect working memory. Vagal afferents are a crucial neuronal component of the gut-brain axis and mediate the information flow from the viscera to the central nervous system. Based on the findings provided by experiments involving vagus nerve stimulation, it has been suggested that vagal afferent signaling may influence various cognitive functions such as recognition memory and cognitive flexibility. Here, we examined this hypothesis using a rat model of subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation (SDA), the most complete and selective abdominal vagal deafferentation method existing to date. We found that SDA did not affect working memory in a nonspatial alternation task, nor did it influence short-, intermediate-, and long-term object recognition memory. SDA did also not affect the acquisition of positively reinforced left-right discrimination learning, but it facilitated the subsequent reversal left-right discrimination learning. The SDA-induced effects on reversal learning emerged in the absence of concomitant changes in motivation towards the positive reinforcer, indicating selective effects on cognitive flexibility. Taken together, these findings suggest that the relative contribution of vagal afferent signaling to cognitive functions is limited. At the same time, our study demonstrates that cognitive flexibility, at least in the domains of positively reinforced learning, is subjected to visceral modulation through abdominal vagal afferents.