Loading…
A motor function measure scale for neuromuscular diseases. Construction and validation study
A new scale for motor function measurement has been developed for neuromuscular diseases. The validation study included 303 patients, aged 6–62 years. Seventy-two patients had Duchenne muscular dystrophy, 32 Becker muscular dystrophy, 30 limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, 39 facio-scapulo-humeral dystr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neuromuscular disorders : NMD 2005-07, Vol.15 (7), p.463-470 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A new scale for motor function measurement has been developed for neuromuscular diseases. The validation study included 303 patients, aged 6–62 years. Seventy-two patients had Duchenne muscular dystrophy, 32 Becker muscular dystrophy, 30 limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, 39 facio-scapulo-humeral dystrophy, 29 myotonic dystrophy, 21 congenital myopathy, 10 congenital muscular dystrophy, 35 spinal muscular atrophy and 35 hereditary neuropathy. The scale comprised 32 items, in three dimensions: standing position and transfers, axial and proximal motor function, distal motor function. Agreement coefficients for inter-rater reliability were excellent (
κ=0.81–0.94) for nine items, good (
κ=0.61–0.80) for 20 items and moderate (
κ=0.51–0.60) for three items. High correlations were found between the total score and other scores: Vignos (
r=0.91) and Brooke (
r=0.85) grades, Functional Independence Measure (
r=0.91), the global severity of disability evaluated with visual analog scales by physicians (
r=0.88) and physiotherapists (
r=0.91). This scale is reliable, does not require any special equipment and is well-accepted by patients. Its sensitivity to change is being assessed to permit its use in clinical trials of neuromuscular diseases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-8966 1873-2364 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.nmd.2005.03.004 |