Loading…
The evolution of unethical behavior engagement amongst longshoremen in France: A 70-year perspective
•Strain and social control play unique roles in misconduct change.•Perceived ostracism drives organizational and societal misconduct.•Carry-over effects account for traditionally unexplained misconduct. Our study builds theory about why employees’ engagement in workplace misconduct changes over time...
Saved in:
Published in: | Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2021-09, Vol.166, p.49-67 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Strain and social control play unique roles in misconduct change.•Perceived ostracism drives organizational and societal misconduct.•Carry-over effects account for traditionally unexplained misconduct.
Our study builds theory about why employees’ engagement in workplace misconduct changes over time. Data collected from 72 interviews with longshoremen, their employers, and port officials in two French ports, supplemented with 70 years of archival data revealed how factors from both the organizational context and greater societal context combine to create a setting in which the seeds of misconduct persist even as the type of misconduct itself transforms. We have three primary findings. First, we find that strain and social control play distinct roles in inciting and allowing unethical behavior. Second, we find ostracism at the societal level plays a critical role in driving societal-targeted misconduct. Third, we find that generational “carry-over effects” from earlier periods’ strain and ostracism account for instances of misconduct left unexplained by classical theories of crime and ostracism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0749-5978 1095-9920 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.06.001 |