Loading…

The impact of business strategy on insider trading profitability

This study examines the relationship between business strategy and the trading profits earned by corporate insiders. Firms following prospector and defender strategies have different objectives and different firm characteristics, which affects the level of information asymmetry that can be used adva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pacific-Basin finance journal 2019-06, Vol.55, p.270-282
Main Authors: Chen, Guang-Zheng, Keung, Edmund C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examines the relationship between business strategy and the trading profits earned by corporate insiders. Firms following prospector and defender strategies have different objectives and different firm characteristics, which affects the level of information asymmetry that can be used advantageously by insiders. Based on a sample of Chinese-listed firms from 2012 through 2015, we find that the profitability of trading by insiders at prospector firms is higher than the profitability of trading by insiders at defender firms. Additional analyses reveal that this finding is primarily attributed to insider sales and male insider trades and that it is also driven by firms not subject to trade restrictions and family-controlled firms. Identifying business strategies used by firms where insiders' trades are more profitable could be relevant to regulators. •This paper utilizes Miles and Snow's typology to measure business strategy.•Prospector firms have higher insider trading profitability than defender firms.•Insiders in prospector firms possess greater information advantage.•Higher trading profits are attributable to insider sales and male insider trades. Such result is driven by firms not subject to trade restrictions and familiy-controlled firms.
ISSN:0927-538X
1879-0585
DOI:10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.04.007