Loading…

Optical properties and conductivity of biased GaAs quantum dots

We report the intraband optical absorption influence on the tunneling currents in biased gallium arsenide quantum dots. The energy levels and tunneling times are calculated using a complex eigenvalue formalism through an axisymmetrical two-dimensional finite element method. The absorption coefficien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physica. E, Low-dimensional systems & nanostructures Low-dimensional systems & nanostructures, 2022-04, Vol.138, p.115084, Article 115084
Main Authors: Aqiqi, S., Duque, C.A., Radu, A., Gil-Corrales, J.A., Morales, A.L., Vinasco, J.A., Laroze, D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We report the intraband optical absorption influence on the tunneling currents in biased gallium arsenide quantum dots. The energy levels and tunneling times are calculated using a complex eigenvalue formalism through an axisymmetrical two-dimensional finite element method. The absorption coefficient and the relative change of the refractive index are evaluated by taking into account a variable intraband relaxation time. A field-invariable relaxation, as it was often assumed by previous theoretical models, cannot be justifiable even for moderate electric fields. On the one hand, our work shows that the electron escape probability and implicitly the tunneling current may be controlled by the resonant optical field. Optically switching the QDs from lower to higher conductivity states is shown to be feasible. On the other hand, at high values of the electric field the tunneling-related electronic linewidth broadening blue-shifts and enlarges the absorption peaks, thus reducing the resonant nature of the intraband transitions. •Conduction and absorption in biased quantum dots are investigated.•The effective mass approximation and the finite element method are used.•Tunneling escape times are calculated from imaginary energies.•Including tunnel effect into calculations greatly affects results.•A field-invariable relaxation rate could not be justified.
ISSN:1386-9477
1873-1759
DOI:10.1016/j.physe.2021.115084