Validation of in situ Applicable Measuring Techniques for Analysis of the Water Adsorption by Stone

As the water adsorbing behaviour (WAB) of stone is a key factor for most degradation processes, its analysis is a decisive aspect when monitoring deterioration and past conservation treatments, or when selecting a proper conservation treatment. In this study the performance of various non-destructiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Procedia chemistry 2013, Vol.8, p.317-327
Main Authors: Vandevoorde, Delphine, Cnudde, Veerle, Dewanckele, Jan, Brabant, Loes, de Bouw, Michael, Meynen, Vera, Verhaeven, Eddy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Capillary rise
Contact-sponge method
Karsten tube
Mirowski pipe
Open porosity
Porous stone materials
Water adsorption
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As the water adsorbing behaviour (WAB) of stone is a key factor for most degradation processes, its analysis is a decisive aspect when monitoring deterioration and past conservation treatments, or when selecting a proper conservation treatment. In this study the performance of various non-destructive methods for measuring the WAB are compared, with the focus on the effect of the variable factors of the methods caused by their specific design. The methods under study are the contact-sponge method (CSM), the Karsten tube (KT) and the Mirowski pipe (MIR). Their performance is compared with the standardized capillary rise method (CR) and the results are analysed in relation to the open porosity of different lithotypes. Furthermore the effect of practical encumbrances which could limit the application of these methods was valuated. It was found that KT and CSM have complementary fields of investigation, where CSM is capable of measuring the initial water uptake of less porous materials with a high precision, while KT was found commodious for measuring longer contact times for more porous lithotypes. MIR showed too many discommodities, leading to unreliable results. To adequately compare the results of the different methods, the size of the contact area appears to be the most influential factor, whereas the contact material and pressure on the surface do not indicate a significant influence on the results. The study of these factors is currently being extended by visualization of the water adsorption process via X-ray and neutron radiography in combination with physico-mathematical models describing the WAB.
ISSN:1876-6196
1876-6196
DOI:10.1016/j.proche.2013.03.039