Loading…

An ANN Approach for the Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength, of Some Sedimentary and Igneous Rocks in Eastern KwaZulu-Natal

The Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) of intact rocks is an essential index of strength in rock engineering. Laboratory based direct compressive strength estimation may be problematic, as obtaining fresh samples is not always feasible. Thus, the aim of indirect methods index test such as point loa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ferentinou, Maria, Fakir, Muhammad
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) of intact rocks is an essential index of strength in rock engineering. Laboratory based direct compressive strength estimation may be problematic, as obtaining fresh samples is not always feasible. Thus, the aim of indirect methods index test such as point load index test, and empirical correlations with UCS of indexes like the Brazilian indirect tensile strength test, serve as an alternative for many geotechnical engineering projects. The aim of this paper is to propose a relationship between UCS and indirect tests or indexes for some sedimentary and igneous rocks in KwaZulu-Natal using the technology of artificial intelligence. These tests include the point load index (Is (50)) test and Brazilian Tensile Strength (σt), test. Block samples were collected in KwaZulu Natal, among these include sedimentary rocks (sandstones, siltstone, tillite) and igneous rocks (granitoids and dolerite). A back propagation artificial neural network was developed and trained in order to predict UCS. The input parameters were unit weight γ, (Is (50)), (σt), and lithology. The lithology was introduced in the neural network as a qualitative input parameter, in order to indirectly incorporate in the model the mineralogical content. Training results returned, R value of 0.99% for the training set, and R = 0.92% for the test set, which is conveying to the conclusion that the approach is valid and could be used, as an alternative indirect approach to UCS estimation.
ISSN:1877-7058
1877-7058
DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.286