Environmental Performance Evaluation of Direct Metal Laser Sintering through Exergy Analysis

Additive manufacturing is rapidly emerging as an alternative to conventional manufacturing, including subtractive processes, often attributed to its claim for sustainable product development, e.g., reduced cost, reduced energy and material use, and the distributed production of tailored consumer pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Procedia manufacturing 2017, Vol.10, p.957-967
Main Authors: Nagarajan, Hari P.N., Haapala, Karl R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Additive Manufacturing
Energy Efficiency
Environment
Exergy Efficiency
Sustainability
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Additive manufacturing is rapidly emerging as an alternative to conventional manufacturing, including subtractive processes, often attributed to its claim for sustainable product development, e.g., reduced cost, reduced energy and material use, and the distributed production of tailored consumer products. However, many of these benefits remain unsubstantiated for large-scale production. The aim of the research herein is to identify the systemic contributors to environmental impacts for additive manufacturing using exergy analysis and life cycle impact assessment. These methods have been previously applied to evaluate the environmental performance of conventional and non-conventional manufacturing processes. Thus, they offer a validated approach to evaluate the environmental impacts of additive manufacturing with respect to systemic material and energy losses. In this study, the environmental impacts of direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) of iron metal powder is characterized by performing a thermodynamic analysis of the resources and energy utilized and lost from cradle-to-gate. It is found that only 6% of total process inputs in DMLS contribute to material processing, while 94% is lost as bulk waste, heat, and work. Life cycle impact assessments are performed to characterize the environmental impacts of these losses using single issue indicator (Global Warming Potential, GWP) and aggregate indicator (ReCiPe 2008) methods. The results show that electricity consumption is a key contributor to the focal process and its related upstream processes. The systemic GWP impact for DMLS was found to be 7.2kg CO2 equivalent. ReCiPe 2008 indicates damage to human health outweighs damage to ecosystem quality (E=84%, H=58%, I=51%) and resource availability (E=74%, H=29%, I=19%) for the DMLS process.
ISSN:2351-9789
2351-9789
DOI:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.087