Loading…

How social media expedites the crisis spillover effect: A case study of Tesla's recall event

Technologies such as intelligent and fully automatic driving are currently developing rapidly. However, product recalls by electric vehicle manufacturers occur frequently because of immature technology. As a crisis factor, product recalls of the focal company pose a risk of contagion to other player...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public relations review 2024-03, Vol.50 (1), p.102432, Article 102432
Main Authors: Xu, Jinghong, Guo, Difan, Zhao, Zi’an, Liu, Shaoqiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-76f93bda39c09a61b07341f99c357411146abf41c3630a0dba40896dff264c5a3
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 102432
container_title Public relations review
container_volume 50
creator Xu, Jinghong
Guo, Difan
Zhao, Zi’an
Liu, Shaoqiang
description Technologies such as intelligent and fully automatic driving are currently developing rapidly. However, product recalls by electric vehicle manufacturers occur frequently because of immature technology. As a crisis factor, product recalls of the focal company pose a risk of contagion to other players. Through a two-period time series analysis, the current study observes that online public opinion regarding Tesla exerts an indirect spillover over abnormal returns on non-focal companies (i.e., BYD, NIO, LI) from two aspects—social media buzz and public sentiment. Moreover, abnormal returns on Tesla directly spill over into abnormal returns on NIO and LI. The low brand equity proximity plays a role in the direct spillover effect. Besides, the time lag is two days in the direct and indirect spillover process. Under the guidance of Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT), we classify spillover crises as victim clusters of crisis types and put forth implications and suggestions in practice based on our findings. •Product recalls are a source of crisis and have a horizontal crisis spillover effect of the focal enterprise on non-focal companies in emerging industries.•Online public opinion regarding Tesla exerts an indirect spillover over abnormal returns on non-focal companies from two aspects—social media buzz and public sentiment.•The low brand equity proximity plays a role in the direct spillover effect. Besides, the time lag is two days in the direct and indirect spillover process.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102432
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pubrev_2024_102432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0363811124000110</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0363811124000110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-76f93bda39c09a61b07341f99c357411146abf41c3630a0dba40896dff264c5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFLwzAYxYMoOKf_gYfcPHUmTdouHoQxnBMGXuZNCGn6BTO6teTLqvvvzahnTw8evMd7P0LuOZtxxsvH3aw_1gGGWc5ymaxcivyCTPi8EpksRHVJJkyUIptzzq_JDeKOMVYoXkzI57r7pthZb1q6h8YbCj990ghI4xdQGzx6pNj7tu0GCBScAxuf6IJag0AxHpsT7RzdArbmAWkAa9qWwgCHeEuunGkR7v50Sj5WL9vlOtu8v74tF5vM5kURs6p0StSNEcoyZUpes0pI7pSyoqhk2ixLUzvJbfrADGtqI9lclY1zeSltYcSUyLHXhg4xgNN98HsTTpozfSakd3okpM-E9EgoxZ7HGKRtg4eg0Xo42HQ_vYi66fz_Bb8zP3EV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>How social media expedites the crisis spillover effect: A case study of Tesla's recall event</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Xu, Jinghong ; Guo, Difan ; Zhao, Zi’an ; Liu, Shaoqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jinghong ; Guo, Difan ; Zhao, Zi’an ; Liu, Shaoqiang</creatorcontrib><description>Technologies such as intelligent and fully automatic driving are currently developing rapidly. However, product recalls by electric vehicle manufacturers occur frequently because of immature technology. As a crisis factor, product recalls of the focal company pose a risk of contagion to other players. Through a two-period time series analysis, the current study observes that online public opinion regarding Tesla exerts an indirect spillover over abnormal returns on non-focal companies (i.e., BYD, NIO, LI) from two aspects—social media buzz and public sentiment. Moreover, abnormal returns on Tesla directly spill over into abnormal returns on NIO and LI. The low brand equity proximity plays a role in the direct spillover effect. Besides, the time lag is two days in the direct and indirect spillover process. Under the guidance of Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT), we classify spillover crises as victim clusters of crisis types and put forth implications and suggestions in practice based on our findings. •Product recalls are a source of crisis and have a horizontal crisis spillover effect of the focal enterprise on non-focal companies in emerging industries.•Online public opinion regarding Tesla exerts an indirect spillover over abnormal returns on non-focal companies from two aspects—social media buzz and public sentiment.•The low brand equity proximity plays a role in the direct spillover effect. Besides, the time lag is two days in the direct and indirect spillover process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-8111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102432</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Crisis spillover effect ; Electric vehicle ; Online public opinion ; Product recall ; Public sentiment ; Social media buzz ; Tesla</subject><ispartof>Public relations review, 2024-03, Vol.50 (1), p.102432, Article 102432</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-76f93bda39c09a61b07341f99c357411146abf41c3630a0dba40896dff264c5a3</cites><orcidid>0009-0009-9834-076X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jinghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Difan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zi’an</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shaoqiang</creatorcontrib><title>How social media expedites the crisis spillover effect: A case study of Tesla's recall event</title><title>Public relations review</title><description>Technologies such as intelligent and fully automatic driving are currently developing rapidly. However, product recalls by electric vehicle manufacturers occur frequently because of immature technology. As a crisis factor, product recalls of the focal company pose a risk of contagion to other players. Through a two-period time series analysis, the current study observes that online public opinion regarding Tesla exerts an indirect spillover over abnormal returns on non-focal companies (i.e., BYD, NIO, LI) from two aspects—social media buzz and public sentiment. Moreover, abnormal returns on Tesla directly spill over into abnormal returns on NIO and LI. The low brand equity proximity plays a role in the direct spillover effect. Besides, the time lag is two days in the direct and indirect spillover process. Under the guidance of Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT), we classify spillover crises as victim clusters of crisis types and put forth implications and suggestions in practice based on our findings. •Product recalls are a source of crisis and have a horizontal crisis spillover effect of the focal enterprise on non-focal companies in emerging industries.•Online public opinion regarding Tesla exerts an indirect spillover over abnormal returns on non-focal companies from two aspects—social media buzz and public sentiment.•The low brand equity proximity plays a role in the direct spillover effect. Besides, the time lag is two days in the direct and indirect spillover process.</description><subject>Crisis spillover effect</subject><subject>Electric vehicle</subject><subject>Online public opinion</subject><subject>Product recall</subject><subject>Public sentiment</subject><subject>Social media buzz</subject><subject>Tesla</subject><issn>0363-8111</issn><issn>1873-4537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFLwzAYxYMoOKf_gYfcPHUmTdouHoQxnBMGXuZNCGn6BTO6teTLqvvvzahnTw8evMd7P0LuOZtxxsvH3aw_1gGGWc5ymaxcivyCTPi8EpksRHVJJkyUIptzzq_JDeKOMVYoXkzI57r7pthZb1q6h8YbCj990ghI4xdQGzx6pNj7tu0GCBScAxuf6IJag0AxHpsT7RzdArbmAWkAa9qWwgCHeEuunGkR7v50Sj5WL9vlOtu8v74tF5vM5kURs6p0StSNEcoyZUpes0pI7pSyoqhk2ixLUzvJbfrADGtqI9lclY1zeSltYcSUyLHXhg4xgNN98HsTTpozfSakd3okpM-E9EgoxZ7HGKRtg4eg0Xo42HQ_vYi66fz_Bb8zP3EV</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Xu, Jinghong</creator><creator>Guo, Difan</creator><creator>Zhao, Zi’an</creator><creator>Liu, Shaoqiang</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9834-076X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>How social media expedites the crisis spillover effect: A case study of Tesla's recall event</title><author>Xu, Jinghong ; Guo, Difan ; Zhao, Zi’an ; Liu, Shaoqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-76f93bda39c09a61b07341f99c357411146abf41c3630a0dba40896dff264c5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Crisis spillover effect</topic><topic>Electric vehicle</topic><topic>Online public opinion</topic><topic>Product recall</topic><topic>Public sentiment</topic><topic>Social media buzz</topic><topic>Tesla</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jinghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Difan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Zi’an</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shaoqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Public relations review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Jinghong</au><au>Guo, Difan</au><au>Zhao, Zi’an</au><au>Liu, Shaoqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How social media expedites the crisis spillover effect: A case study of Tesla's recall event</atitle><jtitle>Public relations review</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>102432</spage><pages>102432-</pages><artnum>102432</artnum><issn>0363-8111</issn><eissn>1873-4537</eissn><abstract>Technologies such as intelligent and fully automatic driving are currently developing rapidly. However, product recalls by electric vehicle manufacturers occur frequently because of immature technology. As a crisis factor, product recalls of the focal company pose a risk of contagion to other players. Through a two-period time series analysis, the current study observes that online public opinion regarding Tesla exerts an indirect spillover over abnormal returns on non-focal companies (i.e., BYD, NIO, LI) from two aspects—social media buzz and public sentiment. Moreover, abnormal returns on Tesla directly spill over into abnormal returns on NIO and LI. The low brand equity proximity plays a role in the direct spillover effect. Besides, the time lag is two days in the direct and indirect spillover process. Under the guidance of Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT), we classify spillover crises as victim clusters of crisis types and put forth implications and suggestions in practice based on our findings. •Product recalls are a source of crisis and have a horizontal crisis spillover effect of the focal enterprise on non-focal companies in emerging industries.•Online public opinion regarding Tesla exerts an indirect spillover over abnormal returns on non-focal companies from two aspects—social media buzz and public sentiment.•The low brand equity proximity plays a role in the direct spillover effect. Besides, the time lag is two days in the direct and indirect spillover process.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102432</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9834-076X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-8111
ispartof Public relations review, 2024-03, Vol.50 (1), p.102432, Article 102432
issn 0363-8111
1873-4537
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pubrev_2024_102432
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Crisis spillover effect
Electric vehicle
Online public opinion
Product recall
Public sentiment
Social media buzz
Tesla
title How social media expedites the crisis spillover effect: A case study of Tesla's recall event
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A05%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20social%20media%20expedites%20the%20crisis%20spillover%20effect:%20A%20case%20study%20of%20Tesla's%20recall%20event&rft.jtitle=Public%20relations%20review&rft.au=Xu,%20Jinghong&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=102432&rft.pages=102432-&rft.artnum=102432&rft.issn=0363-8111&rft.eissn=1873-4537&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102432&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0363811124000110%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-76f93bda39c09a61b07341f99c357411146abf41c3630a0dba40896dff264c5a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true