Loading…
Comparison of airborne radiation detectors carried by rotary-wing unmanned aerial systems
The Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), the National Metrology Institute of Germany (PTB) and the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) have analysed the response of a 50 mm × 50 mm (diameter × height) NaI and a 38 mm × 38 mm CeBr3 scintillator, and a 1500 mm3 CZT semiconductor a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiation measurements 2021-07, Vol.145, p.106595, Article 106595 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-85005ac543d192bd51bd45312e97831b40048fa2b91056450975ea8740bebbed3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-85005ac543d192bd51bd45312e97831b40048fa2b91056450975ea8740bebbed3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 106595 |
container_title | Radiation measurements |
container_volume | 145 |
creator | Vargas, A. Costa, D. Macias, M. Royo, P. Pastor, E. Luchkov, M. Neumaier, S. Stöhlker, U. Luff, R. |
description | The Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), the National Metrology Institute of Germany (PTB) and the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) have analysed the response of a 50 mm × 50 mm (diameter × height) NaI and a 38 mm × 38 mm CeBr3 scintillator, and a 1500 mm3 CZT semiconductor airborne spectrometric detector mounted on Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) in a comparison campaign carried out at the aerial site of Mollerussa (Spain). The decision thresholds that indicate the presence of artificial radioactivity are calculated for the count rates in the low energy region of the spectra, the man-made count rates and the ambient dose equivalent rates from the background flights performed at altitudes ranging between 10 m and 60 m. The capability of the different airborne systems to detect and determine the activity of 345 MBq 137Cs point source at different flight altitudes are compared. Finally, the airborne systems show the ability to localize the 137Cs point source by flying in parallel lines at 10 m, 20 m and 40 m heights.
•An optimum flight altitude of around 20 m is determined from the UAS comparison.•MMGC method is suitable to detect artificial radionuclides using UAS.•Decision thresholds are used to indicate the presence of artificial radionuclides.•Altitude and spectrum counts are the main contributions to detection uncertainty. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106595 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radmeas_2021_106595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1350448721001098</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1350448721001098</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-85005ac543d192bd51bd45312e97831b40048fa2b91056450975ea8740bebbed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gpAX6Ji0uW2zEhn8gwE3unAVkuZWMkyb4aYq8_Zm6Oxd3cOBczj3Y-xWipUUsr7brsj6AW1alaKU2atBwxlbyLbRhdAlnGddgSiUaptLdpXSVgihdA0L9rmOw95SSHHksec2kIs0Is-NwU4hux4n7KZIiXeWKKDn7sApTpYOxW8Yv_j3ONhxzL5FCnbH0yFNOKRrdtHbXcKb012yj6fH9_VLsXl7fl0_bIqugnoqWhACbAeq8lKXzoN0XkElS9RNW0mn8tK2t6XTUkCtQOgG0LaNEg6dQ18tGcy9HcWUCHuzpzDkdUYKc-RjtubExxz5mJlPzt3POczjfgKSSV3AsUMfKD9sfAz_NPwBewByPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of airborne radiation detectors carried by rotary-wing unmanned aerial systems</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Vargas, A. ; Costa, D. ; Macias, M. ; Royo, P. ; Pastor, E. ; Luchkov, M. ; Neumaier, S. ; Stöhlker, U. ; Luff, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vargas, A. ; Costa, D. ; Macias, M. ; Royo, P. ; Pastor, E. ; Luchkov, M. ; Neumaier, S. ; Stöhlker, U. ; Luff, R.</creatorcontrib><description>The Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), the National Metrology Institute of Germany (PTB) and the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) have analysed the response of a 50 mm × 50 mm (diameter × height) NaI and a 38 mm × 38 mm CeBr3 scintillator, and a 1500 mm3 CZT semiconductor airborne spectrometric detector mounted on Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) in a comparison campaign carried out at the aerial site of Mollerussa (Spain). The decision thresholds that indicate the presence of artificial radioactivity are calculated for the count rates in the low energy region of the spectra, the man-made count rates and the ambient dose equivalent rates from the background flights performed at altitudes ranging between 10 m and 60 m. The capability of the different airborne systems to detect and determine the activity of 345 MBq 137Cs point source at different flight altitudes are compared. Finally, the airborne systems show the ability to localize the 137Cs point source by flying in parallel lines at 10 m, 20 m and 40 m heights.
•An optimum flight altitude of around 20 m is determined from the UAS comparison.•MMGC method is suitable to detect artificial radionuclides using UAS.•Decision thresholds are used to indicate the presence of artificial radionuclides.•Altitude and spectrum counts are the main contributions to detection uncertainty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-4487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Airborne radiological detector ; Environmental radioactivity mapping ; Source localization ; Unmanned aerial system</subject><ispartof>Radiation measurements, 2021-07, Vol.145, p.106595, Article 106595</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-85005ac543d192bd51bd45312e97831b40048fa2b91056450975ea8740bebbed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-85005ac543d192bd51bd45312e97831b40048fa2b91056450975ea8740bebbed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0818-3759 ; 0000-0002-2576-9671 ; 0000-0002-3131-258X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vargas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macias, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Royo, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luchkov, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumaier, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stöhlker, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luff, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of airborne radiation detectors carried by rotary-wing unmanned aerial systems</title><title>Radiation measurements</title><description>The Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), the National Metrology Institute of Germany (PTB) and the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) have analysed the response of a 50 mm × 50 mm (diameter × height) NaI and a 38 mm × 38 mm CeBr3 scintillator, and a 1500 mm3 CZT semiconductor airborne spectrometric detector mounted on Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) in a comparison campaign carried out at the aerial site of Mollerussa (Spain). The decision thresholds that indicate the presence of artificial radioactivity are calculated for the count rates in the low energy region of the spectra, the man-made count rates and the ambient dose equivalent rates from the background flights performed at altitudes ranging between 10 m and 60 m. The capability of the different airborne systems to detect and determine the activity of 345 MBq 137Cs point source at different flight altitudes are compared. Finally, the airborne systems show the ability to localize the 137Cs point source by flying in parallel lines at 10 m, 20 m and 40 m heights.
•An optimum flight altitude of around 20 m is determined from the UAS comparison.•MMGC method is suitable to detect artificial radionuclides using UAS.•Decision thresholds are used to indicate the presence of artificial radionuclides.•Altitude and spectrum counts are the main contributions to detection uncertainty.</description><subject>Airborne radiological detector</subject><subject>Environmental radioactivity mapping</subject><subject>Source localization</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial system</subject><issn>1350-4487</issn><issn>1879-0925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gpAX6Ji0uW2zEhn8gwE3unAVkuZWMkyb4aYq8_Zm6Oxd3cOBczj3Y-xWipUUsr7brsj6AW1alaKU2atBwxlbyLbRhdAlnGddgSiUaptLdpXSVgihdA0L9rmOw95SSHHksec2kIs0Is-NwU4hux4n7KZIiXeWKKDn7sApTpYOxW8Yv_j3ONhxzL5FCnbH0yFNOKRrdtHbXcKb012yj6fH9_VLsXl7fl0_bIqugnoqWhACbAeq8lKXzoN0XkElS9RNW0mn8tK2t6XTUkCtQOgG0LaNEg6dQ18tGcy9HcWUCHuzpzDkdUYKc-RjtubExxz5mJlPzt3POczjfgKSSV3AsUMfKD9sfAz_NPwBewByPw</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Vargas, A.</creator><creator>Costa, D.</creator><creator>Macias, M.</creator><creator>Royo, P.</creator><creator>Pastor, E.</creator><creator>Luchkov, M.</creator><creator>Neumaier, S.</creator><creator>Stöhlker, U.</creator><creator>Luff, R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-3759</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2576-9671</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3131-258X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Comparison of airborne radiation detectors carried by rotary-wing unmanned aerial systems</title><author>Vargas, A. ; Costa, D. ; Macias, M. ; Royo, P. ; Pastor, E. ; Luchkov, M. ; Neumaier, S. ; Stöhlker, U. ; Luff, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-85005ac543d192bd51bd45312e97831b40048fa2b91056450975ea8740bebbed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Airborne radiological detector</topic><topic>Environmental radioactivity mapping</topic><topic>Source localization</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vargas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macias, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Royo, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luchkov, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumaier, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stöhlker, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luff, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation measurements</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vargas, A.</au><au>Costa, D.</au><au>Macias, M.</au><au>Royo, P.</au><au>Pastor, E.</au><au>Luchkov, M.</au><au>Neumaier, S.</au><au>Stöhlker, U.</au><au>Luff, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of airborne radiation detectors carried by rotary-wing unmanned aerial systems</atitle><jtitle>Radiation measurements</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>145</volume><spage>106595</spage><pages>106595-</pages><artnum>106595</artnum><issn>1350-4487</issn><eissn>1879-0925</eissn><abstract>The Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), the National Metrology Institute of Germany (PTB) and the German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) have analysed the response of a 50 mm × 50 mm (diameter × height) NaI and a 38 mm × 38 mm CeBr3 scintillator, and a 1500 mm3 CZT semiconductor airborne spectrometric detector mounted on Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) in a comparison campaign carried out at the aerial site of Mollerussa (Spain). The decision thresholds that indicate the presence of artificial radioactivity are calculated for the count rates in the low energy region of the spectra, the man-made count rates and the ambient dose equivalent rates from the background flights performed at altitudes ranging between 10 m and 60 m. The capability of the different airborne systems to detect and determine the activity of 345 MBq 137Cs point source at different flight altitudes are compared. Finally, the airborne systems show the ability to localize the 137Cs point source by flying in parallel lines at 10 m, 20 m and 40 m heights.
•An optimum flight altitude of around 20 m is determined from the UAS comparison.•MMGC method is suitable to detect artificial radionuclides using UAS.•Decision thresholds are used to indicate the presence of artificial radionuclides.•Altitude and spectrum counts are the main contributions to detection uncertainty.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106595</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-3759</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2576-9671</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3131-258X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-4487 |
ispartof | Radiation measurements, 2021-07, Vol.145, p.106595, Article 106595 |
issn | 1350-4487 1879-0925 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radmeas_2021_106595 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Airborne radiological detector Environmental radioactivity mapping Source localization Unmanned aerial system |
title | Comparison of airborne radiation detectors carried by rotary-wing unmanned aerial systems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A29%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20airborne%20radiation%20detectors%20carried%20by%20rotary-wing%20unmanned%20aerial%20systems&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20measurements&rft.au=Vargas,%20A.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=145&rft.spage=106595&rft.pages=106595-&rft.artnum=106595&rft.issn=1350-4487&rft.eissn=1879-0925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106595&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES1350448721001098%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-85005ac543d192bd51bd45312e97831b40048fa2b91056450975ea8740bebbed3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |