Loading…

Personalized 3D dosimetry of 90Y radioembolization: Monte Carlo simulation study using GATE

This work aims to compare absorbed dose accuracy in tumour, normal liver, and lungs between the Partition Model (PM) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation using MIRD phantom and patient tomography, considering patient-specific factors like pre-treatment parameters, source distribution, and tumour location...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993) England : 1993), 2024-10, Vol.223, p.111956, Article 111956
Main Authors: Abdul Hadi, Muhammad Fahmi Rizal, Hashikin, Nurul Ab Aziz, Ying, Chee Keat, Zuber, Siti Hajar, Yeong, Chai Hong, Yoon, Tiem Leong, Ng, Kwan Hoong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-1c4cea73ea3caf7cdcd63e1d75983ea066c4d3f3d48f648092a62558c71342733
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 111956
container_title Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993)
container_volume 223
creator Abdul Hadi, Muhammad Fahmi Rizal
Hashikin, Nurul Ab Aziz
Ying, Chee Keat
Zuber, Siti Hajar
Yeong, Chai Hong
Yoon, Tiem Leong
Ng, Kwan Hoong
description This work aims to compare absorbed dose accuracy in tumour, normal liver, and lungs between the Partition Model (PM) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation using MIRD phantom and patient tomography, considering patient-specific factors like pre-treatment parameters, source distribution, and tumour location. It outlines the procedure for acquiring patient images and treatment parameters from a medical institute and prepared by importing, segmenting, and registering tomographic images using the 3D Slicer software. Subsequently, the processed images are imported into GATE for MC simulation, with various source distributions applied for each patient. Absorbed dose estimates are also obtained using MC simulations with the MIRD phantom in Geant4, utilizing treatment parameters exclusively. These absorbed dose estimations are then compared with those obtained from patient measurements (PM). To visualize the isodose distributions resulting from the MC simulation, the SlicerRT extension of 3D Slicer is employed. The results revealed that, in most cases, higher absorbed doses when compared to PM calculations for MIRD phantom MC simulation. This discrepancy is attributed to the PM's assumption of localized energy deposition, neglecting crossfire effects. In MC simulation, when SPECT images were considered for source distribution, PM calculations yielded considerably higher absorbed doses for patients 1, 4, and 5, while patients 2 and 3 had lower values due to variations in source distribution intensity within the SPECT images. Employing region VOI for source distribution generally resulted in higher absorbed doses for the tumour in PM calculations, except for patient 3. Normalizing the prescribed tumour dose to 120 Gy highlighted differences in dose distribution, particularly for patients 2, 3, and 4. Isodose distribution analysis revealed variations in dose concentration between the simulations, with some regions experiencing higher doses in Geant4 simulations. This study emphasizes the significance of individualized dosimetry for 90Y radioembolization therapy through the utilization of MC simulation, the MIRD phantom, and patient tomography images. It presents a comparative analysis of this approach against PM calculations. •Monte Carlo toolkit: GATE for simulation study.•Comparison between Partition Model (PM) and Monte Carlo simulation in 90Y radioembolization.•Dosimetry evaluation in radioembolization treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111956
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2024_111956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0969806X24004481</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0969806X24004481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-1c4cea73ea3caf7cdcd63e1d75983ea066c4d3f3d48f648092a62558c71342733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLwzAcxYMoOKffIX6A1qRp08TbqHMKEz1MUDyEmPzrMtpmJJ1QP72d8-DR04PHe4_HD6FLSlJKKL_apEHb7XqIZg1tmpEsTymlsuBHaEJFKRMiZHGMJkRymQjCX07RWYwbQkgpCjZBb08Qou90477AYnaDrY-uhT4M2NdYklc87jsP7bsfI7p3vrvGD77rAVc6NB6P6V3z4-PY7-yAd9F1H3gxW83P0UmtmwgXvzpFz7fzVXWXLB8X99VsmZjxaJ9QkxvQJQPNjK5LY43lDKgtCylGk3BucstqZnNR81wQmWmeFYUwJWV5VjI2RfKwa4KPMUCttsG1OgyKErWnpDbqDyW1p6QOlMZudejCePDTQVDROOgMWBfA9Mp694-Vb3R_d7s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Personalized 3D dosimetry of 90Y radioembolization: Monte Carlo simulation study using GATE</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Abdul Hadi, Muhammad Fahmi Rizal ; Hashikin, Nurul Ab Aziz ; Ying, Chee Keat ; Zuber, Siti Hajar ; Yeong, Chai Hong ; Yoon, Tiem Leong ; Ng, Kwan Hoong</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdul Hadi, Muhammad Fahmi Rizal ; Hashikin, Nurul Ab Aziz ; Ying, Chee Keat ; Zuber, Siti Hajar ; Yeong, Chai Hong ; Yoon, Tiem Leong ; Ng, Kwan Hoong</creatorcontrib><description>This work aims to compare absorbed dose accuracy in tumour, normal liver, and lungs between the Partition Model (PM) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation using MIRD phantom and patient tomography, considering patient-specific factors like pre-treatment parameters, source distribution, and tumour location. It outlines the procedure for acquiring patient images and treatment parameters from a medical institute and prepared by importing, segmenting, and registering tomographic images using the 3D Slicer software. Subsequently, the processed images are imported into GATE for MC simulation, with various source distributions applied for each patient. Absorbed dose estimates are also obtained using MC simulations with the MIRD phantom in Geant4, utilizing treatment parameters exclusively. These absorbed dose estimations are then compared with those obtained from patient measurements (PM). To visualize the isodose distributions resulting from the MC simulation, the SlicerRT extension of 3D Slicer is employed. The results revealed that, in most cases, higher absorbed doses when compared to PM calculations for MIRD phantom MC simulation. This discrepancy is attributed to the PM's assumption of localized energy deposition, neglecting crossfire effects. In MC simulation, when SPECT images were considered for source distribution, PM calculations yielded considerably higher absorbed doses for patients 1, 4, and 5, while patients 2 and 3 had lower values due to variations in source distribution intensity within the SPECT images. Employing region VOI for source distribution generally resulted in higher absorbed doses for the tumour in PM calculations, except for patient 3. Normalizing the prescribed tumour dose to 120 Gy highlighted differences in dose distribution, particularly for patients 2, 3, and 4. Isodose distribution analysis revealed variations in dose concentration between the simulations, with some regions experiencing higher doses in Geant4 simulations. This study emphasizes the significance of individualized dosimetry for 90Y radioembolization therapy through the utilization of MC simulation, the MIRD phantom, and patient tomography images. It presents a comparative analysis of this approach against PM calculations. •Monte Carlo toolkit: GATE for simulation study.•Comparison between Partition Model (PM) and Monte Carlo simulation in 90Y radioembolization.•Dosimetry evaluation in radioembolization treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-806X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0895</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Monte Carlo simulation ; Radioembolization ; Yttrium-90</subject><ispartof>Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993), 2024-10, Vol.223, p.111956, Article 111956</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-1c4cea73ea3caf7cdcd63e1d75983ea066c4d3f3d48f648092a62558c71342733</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8890-1361</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdul Hadi, Muhammad Fahmi Rizal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashikin, Nurul Ab Aziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Chee Keat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuber, Siti Hajar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeong, Chai Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Tiem Leong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Kwan Hoong</creatorcontrib><title>Personalized 3D dosimetry of 90Y radioembolization: Monte Carlo simulation study using GATE</title><title>Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993)</title><description>This work aims to compare absorbed dose accuracy in tumour, normal liver, and lungs between the Partition Model (PM) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation using MIRD phantom and patient tomography, considering patient-specific factors like pre-treatment parameters, source distribution, and tumour location. It outlines the procedure for acquiring patient images and treatment parameters from a medical institute and prepared by importing, segmenting, and registering tomographic images using the 3D Slicer software. Subsequently, the processed images are imported into GATE for MC simulation, with various source distributions applied for each patient. Absorbed dose estimates are also obtained using MC simulations with the MIRD phantom in Geant4, utilizing treatment parameters exclusively. These absorbed dose estimations are then compared with those obtained from patient measurements (PM). To visualize the isodose distributions resulting from the MC simulation, the SlicerRT extension of 3D Slicer is employed. The results revealed that, in most cases, higher absorbed doses when compared to PM calculations for MIRD phantom MC simulation. This discrepancy is attributed to the PM's assumption of localized energy deposition, neglecting crossfire effects. In MC simulation, when SPECT images were considered for source distribution, PM calculations yielded considerably higher absorbed doses for patients 1, 4, and 5, while patients 2 and 3 had lower values due to variations in source distribution intensity within the SPECT images. Employing region VOI for source distribution generally resulted in higher absorbed doses for the tumour in PM calculations, except for patient 3. Normalizing the prescribed tumour dose to 120 Gy highlighted differences in dose distribution, particularly for patients 2, 3, and 4. Isodose distribution analysis revealed variations in dose concentration between the simulations, with some regions experiencing higher doses in Geant4 simulations. This study emphasizes the significance of individualized dosimetry for 90Y radioembolization therapy through the utilization of MC simulation, the MIRD phantom, and patient tomography images. It presents a comparative analysis of this approach against PM calculations. •Monte Carlo toolkit: GATE for simulation study.•Comparison between Partition Model (PM) and Monte Carlo simulation in 90Y radioembolization.•Dosimetry evaluation in radioembolization treatment.</description><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Radioembolization</subject><subject>Yttrium-90</subject><issn>0969-806X</issn><issn>1879-0895</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEFLwzAcxYMoOKffIX6A1qRp08TbqHMKEz1MUDyEmPzrMtpmJJ1QP72d8-DR04PHe4_HD6FLSlJKKL_apEHb7XqIZg1tmpEsTymlsuBHaEJFKRMiZHGMJkRymQjCX07RWYwbQkgpCjZBb08Qou90477AYnaDrY-uhT4M2NdYklc87jsP7bsfI7p3vrvGD77rAVc6NB6P6V3z4-PY7-yAd9F1H3gxW83P0UmtmwgXvzpFz7fzVXWXLB8X99VsmZjxaJ9QkxvQJQPNjK5LY43lDKgtCylGk3BucstqZnNR81wQmWmeFYUwJWV5VjI2RfKwa4KPMUCttsG1OgyKErWnpDbqDyW1p6QOlMZudejCePDTQVDROOgMWBfA9Mp694-Vb3R_d7s</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Abdul Hadi, Muhammad Fahmi Rizal</creator><creator>Hashikin, Nurul Ab Aziz</creator><creator>Ying, Chee Keat</creator><creator>Zuber, Siti Hajar</creator><creator>Yeong, Chai Hong</creator><creator>Yoon, Tiem Leong</creator><creator>Ng, Kwan Hoong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-1361</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Personalized 3D dosimetry of 90Y radioembolization: Monte Carlo simulation study using GATE</title><author>Abdul Hadi, Muhammad Fahmi Rizal ; Hashikin, Nurul Ab Aziz ; Ying, Chee Keat ; Zuber, Siti Hajar ; Yeong, Chai Hong ; Yoon, Tiem Leong ; Ng, Kwan Hoong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-1c4cea73ea3caf7cdcd63e1d75983ea066c4d3f3d48f648092a62558c71342733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Radioembolization</topic><topic>Yttrium-90</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdul Hadi, Muhammad Fahmi Rizal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashikin, Nurul Ab Aziz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Chee Keat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuber, Siti Hajar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeong, Chai Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Tiem Leong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Kwan Hoong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdul Hadi, Muhammad Fahmi Rizal</au><au>Hashikin, Nurul Ab Aziz</au><au>Ying, Chee Keat</au><au>Zuber, Siti Hajar</au><au>Yeong, Chai Hong</au><au>Yoon, Tiem Leong</au><au>Ng, Kwan Hoong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Personalized 3D dosimetry of 90Y radioembolization: Monte Carlo simulation study using GATE</atitle><jtitle>Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993)</jtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>223</volume><spage>111956</spage><pages>111956-</pages><artnum>111956</artnum><issn>0969-806X</issn><eissn>1879-0895</eissn><abstract>This work aims to compare absorbed dose accuracy in tumour, normal liver, and lungs between the Partition Model (PM) and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation using MIRD phantom and patient tomography, considering patient-specific factors like pre-treatment parameters, source distribution, and tumour location. It outlines the procedure for acquiring patient images and treatment parameters from a medical institute and prepared by importing, segmenting, and registering tomographic images using the 3D Slicer software. Subsequently, the processed images are imported into GATE for MC simulation, with various source distributions applied for each patient. Absorbed dose estimates are also obtained using MC simulations with the MIRD phantom in Geant4, utilizing treatment parameters exclusively. These absorbed dose estimations are then compared with those obtained from patient measurements (PM). To visualize the isodose distributions resulting from the MC simulation, the SlicerRT extension of 3D Slicer is employed. The results revealed that, in most cases, higher absorbed doses when compared to PM calculations for MIRD phantom MC simulation. This discrepancy is attributed to the PM's assumption of localized energy deposition, neglecting crossfire effects. In MC simulation, when SPECT images were considered for source distribution, PM calculations yielded considerably higher absorbed doses for patients 1, 4, and 5, while patients 2 and 3 had lower values due to variations in source distribution intensity within the SPECT images. Employing region VOI for source distribution generally resulted in higher absorbed doses for the tumour in PM calculations, except for patient 3. Normalizing the prescribed tumour dose to 120 Gy highlighted differences in dose distribution, particularly for patients 2, 3, and 4. Isodose distribution analysis revealed variations in dose concentration between the simulations, with some regions experiencing higher doses in Geant4 simulations. This study emphasizes the significance of individualized dosimetry for 90Y radioembolization therapy through the utilization of MC simulation, the MIRD phantom, and patient tomography images. It presents a comparative analysis of this approach against PM calculations. •Monte Carlo toolkit: GATE for simulation study.•Comparison between Partition Model (PM) and Monte Carlo simulation in 90Y radioembolization.•Dosimetry evaluation in radioembolization treatment.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111956</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-1361</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-806X
ispartof Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993), 2024-10, Vol.223, p.111956, Article 111956
issn 0969-806X
1879-0895
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2024_111956
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Monte Carlo simulation
Radioembolization
Yttrium-90
title Personalized 3D dosimetry of 90Y radioembolization: Monte Carlo simulation study using GATE
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A20%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Personalized%203D%20dosimetry%20of%2090Y%20radioembolization:%20Monte%20Carlo%20simulation%20study%20using%20GATE&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20physics%20and%20chemistry%20(Oxford,%20England%20:%201993)&rft.au=Abdul%20Hadi,%20Muhammad%20Fahmi%20Rizal&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=223&rft.spage=111956&rft.pages=111956-&rft.artnum=111956&rft.issn=0969-806X&rft.eissn=1879-0895&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111956&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0969806X24004481%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-1c4cea73ea3caf7cdcd63e1d75983ea066c4d3f3d48f648092a62558c71342733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true