An economic and environmental assessment of transporting bulk energy from a grazing ocean thermal energy conversion facility

• Published in: Renewable energy 2014-11, Vol.71, p.361-367
• Main Authors: Gilmore, Elisabeth A., Blohm, Andrew, Sinsabaugh, Steven
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ammonia; Applied sciences; Energy; Exact sciences and technology; Liquid hydrogen; Market analysis; Methanol; Natural energy; Ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC); Onboard synthesis
• ISSN: 0960-1481; 1879-0682
• DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.021

An ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) facility produces electrical power without generating carbon dioxide (CO2) by using the temperature differential between the reservoir of cold water at greater depths and the shallow mixed layer on the ocean surface. As some of the best sites are located far from shore, one option is to ship a high-energy carrier by tanker from these open-ocean or “grazing” OTEC platforms. We evaluate the economics and environmental attributes of producing and transporting energy using ammonia (NH3), liquid hydrogen (LH2) and methanol (CH3OH). For each carrier, we develop transportation pathways that include onboard production, transport via tanker, onshore conversion and delivery to market. We then calculate the difference between the market price and the variable cost for generating the product using the OTEC platform without and with a price on CO2 emissions. Finally, we compare the difference in prices to the capital cost of the OTEC platform and onboard synthesis equipment. For all pathways, the variable cost is lower than the market price, although this difference is insufficient to recover the entire capital costs for a first of a kind OTEC platform. With an onboard synthesis efficiency of 75%, we recover 5%, 25% and 45% of the capital and fixed costs for LH2, CH3OH and NH3, respectively. Improving the capital costs of the OTEC platform by up to 25% and adding present estimates for the damages from CO2 do not alter these conclusions. The near-term potential for the grazing OTEC platform is limited in existing markets. In the longer term, lower capital costs combined with improvements in onboard synthesis costs and efficiency as well as increases in CO2 damages may allow the products from OTEC platforms to enter into markets. •Bulk energy carriers can be used to transport OTEC energy to onshore markets.•These carriers have a lower variable cost than the price in existing markets.•Grazing OTEC and product synthesis costs are not fully recovered at market prices.•Present estimates of damages from CO2 do not change this conclusion.•A grazing OTEC is not presently cost-effective, but may be viable in the longer term.