Loading…

Complex system, simple indicators: Evaluation of circularity and statistical entropy as indicators of sustainability in Austrian nutrient management

•Progress towards resource management goals needs to be monitored and assessed.•Finance, time and data constraints require simple but meaningful indicators.•Circularity and Substance Concentration Efficiency are such simple indicators.•They are tested on a material flow analysis of the Austrian P-N-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resources, conservation and recycling conservation and recycling, 2020-11, Vol.162, p.104961, Article 104961
Main Authors: Tanzer, Julia, Rechberger, Helmut
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Progress towards resource management goals needs to be monitored and assessed.•Finance, time and data constraints require simple but meaningful indicators.•Circularity and Substance Concentration Efficiency are such simple indicators.•They are tested on a material flow analysis of the Austrian P-N-system.•SCE is suitable for preliminary assessment of complex nutrient systems. The successful implementation of sustainable resource management strategies depends on the availability of indicators that are capable of reflecting system complexity adequately but can easily be computed and communicated. However, systematic assessment of the scope and limits of simple indicators is often lacking. In the present study two indicators that can readily be derived from a material flow analysis structure are applied to and evaluated in a large and complex system of phosphorus and nitrogen management in Austria. Circularity (C) is defined as the share of recycled materials in total system throughput, whereas the Substance Concentration Efficiency (SCE), an indicator based on statistical entropy, measures the extent to which a substance is concentrated or diluted while passing through the system. For comparison the indicators were normalized with respect to a best-case and worst-case scenario (C¯ and SCE¯). Although both indicators correspond well in their general statements, clear differences in the prioritization of different aspects of sustainability can be observed. While C¯ focuses on increasing recycling, emission reduction and system downsizing have stronger effects on SCE¯. SCE¯ therefore is considered more suitable for providing first indications on sustainability in Austrian nutrient management.
ISSN:0921-3449
1879-0658
DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104961