Loading…

Comparing the climate impact of methanol production in Europe: Steam methane reforming vs. Plastic waste gasification processes

This study compares the climate change impacts of three methanol production processes: the conventional method via steam methane reforming, and two alternatives – gasiforming and electriforming – which utilize plastic waste as feedstock. A gate-to-gate LCA approach is employed, considering credits a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resources, conservation and recycling conservation and recycling, 2024-09, Vol.208, p.107653, Article 107653
Main Authors: Prifti, Kristiano, Lechtenberg, Fabian, Manenti, Flavio, Espuña, Antonio, Graells, Moisès
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-850090db19f3686219c3b5b57561cee05b1b5db2aa60b5c9b3a95547bcb837693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-850090db19f3686219c3b5b57561cee05b1b5db2aa60b5c9b3a95547bcb837693
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 107653
container_title Resources, conservation and recycling
container_volume 208
creator Prifti, Kristiano
Lechtenberg, Fabian
Manenti, Flavio
Espuña, Antonio
Graells, Moisès
description This study compares the climate change impacts of three methanol production processes: the conventional method via steam methane reforming, and two alternatives – gasiforming and electriforming – which utilize plastic waste as feedstock. A gate-to-gate LCA approach is employed, considering credits and substitution impacts for avoiding traditional end-of-life treatment of plastic waste. Influential local parameters for GWP reduction are identified to include electricity carbon footprint, waste treatment infrastructure, incinerator efficiency, and the utilization of captured CO2 streams. Regional conditions are found to be crucial, as demonstrated by a case study comparing technology choices among EU27+3 countries. The study concludes that the novel plastic waste treatment and methanol production processes, have the potential to mitigate climate change impact, particularly when diverting plastic waste from incineration. With carbon-neutral electricity and avoided incineration, the specific impact reduction in methanol production can reach 2 kg CO2e per kg methanol. [Display omitted] •Gasification of mixed plastic waste can be used to decarbonize methanol consumption.•Sustainability hinges on regional electricity footprint and the plastic’s original EOL.•“Gasiforming” reduces GWP, especially in regions where incineration is common.•“Electriforming” promises impact reduction in all nations below 200 g CO2e/kWh.•At scale, in the EU a potential GWP reduction in the Mt CO2e range is identified.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107653
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2024_107653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921344924002477</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0921344924002477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-850090db19f3686219c3b5b57561cee05b1b5db2aa60b5c9b3a95547bcb837693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KAzEUhYMoWKvPYF5gajKZZCbuSqk_UFBQ1yHJ3GlTOpOSpBVXvrqpLW5dXTic83HuQeiWkgklVNytJwGi9UMAOylJWWW1FpydoRFtalkQwZtzNCKypAWrKnmJrmJcE0JYI9kIfc98v9XBDUucVoDtxvU6AXZZtAn7DveQVnrwG7wNvt3Z5PyA3YDnu-C3cI_fEuj-ZAIcoPOhP8D2cYJfNzomZ_FnPoCXOrrOWf1LyDALMUK8Rhed3kS4Od0x-niYv8-eisXL4_NsuigsE1UqGk6IJK2hsmOiESWVlhlueM0FtQCEG2p4a0qtBTHcSsO05LyqjTUNq4VkY1QfuTb4GHNPtQ351fClKFGHHdVa_e2oDjuq4445OT0mIdfbOwgqWgeDhdZla1Ktd_8yfgCUO4Mb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the climate impact of methanol production in Europe: Steam methane reforming vs. Plastic waste gasification processes</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Prifti, Kristiano ; Lechtenberg, Fabian ; Manenti, Flavio ; Espuña, Antonio ; Graells, Moisès</creator><creatorcontrib>Prifti, Kristiano ; Lechtenberg, Fabian ; Manenti, Flavio ; Espuña, Antonio ; Graells, Moisès</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares the climate change impacts of three methanol production processes: the conventional method via steam methane reforming, and two alternatives – gasiforming and electriforming – which utilize plastic waste as feedstock. A gate-to-gate LCA approach is employed, considering credits and substitution impacts for avoiding traditional end-of-life treatment of plastic waste. Influential local parameters for GWP reduction are identified to include electricity carbon footprint, waste treatment infrastructure, incinerator efficiency, and the utilization of captured CO2 streams. Regional conditions are found to be crucial, as demonstrated by a case study comparing technology choices among EU27+3 countries. The study concludes that the novel plastic waste treatment and methanol production processes, have the potential to mitigate climate change impact, particularly when diverting plastic waste from incineration. With carbon-neutral electricity and avoided incineration, the specific impact reduction in methanol production can reach 2 kg CO2e per kg methanol. [Display omitted] •Gasification of mixed plastic waste can be used to decarbonize methanol consumption.•Sustainability hinges on regional electricity footprint and the plastic’s original EOL.•“Gasiforming” reduces GWP, especially in regions where incineration is common.•“Electriforming” promises impact reduction in all nations below 200 g CO2e/kWh.•At scale, in the EU a potential GWP reduction in the Mt CO2e range is identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-3449</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107653</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Circular economy ; Decision-making ; LCA ; Plastic waste ; Waste-to-resource</subject><ispartof>Resources, conservation and recycling, 2024-09, Vol.208, p.107653, Article 107653</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-850090db19f3686219c3b5b57561cee05b1b5db2aa60b5c9b3a95547bcb837693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-850090db19f3686219c3b5b57561cee05b1b5db2aa60b5c9b3a95547bcb837693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0553-2191 ; 0000-0002-3659-1178 ; 0000-0001-8884-634X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prifti, Kristiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lechtenberg, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manenti, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espuña, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graells, Moisès</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the climate impact of methanol production in Europe: Steam methane reforming vs. Plastic waste gasification processes</title><title>Resources, conservation and recycling</title><description>This study compares the climate change impacts of three methanol production processes: the conventional method via steam methane reforming, and two alternatives – gasiforming and electriforming – which utilize plastic waste as feedstock. A gate-to-gate LCA approach is employed, considering credits and substitution impacts for avoiding traditional end-of-life treatment of plastic waste. Influential local parameters for GWP reduction are identified to include electricity carbon footprint, waste treatment infrastructure, incinerator efficiency, and the utilization of captured CO2 streams. Regional conditions are found to be crucial, as demonstrated by a case study comparing technology choices among EU27+3 countries. The study concludes that the novel plastic waste treatment and methanol production processes, have the potential to mitigate climate change impact, particularly when diverting plastic waste from incineration. With carbon-neutral electricity and avoided incineration, the specific impact reduction in methanol production can reach 2 kg CO2e per kg methanol. [Display omitted] •Gasification of mixed plastic waste can be used to decarbonize methanol consumption.•Sustainability hinges on regional electricity footprint and the plastic’s original EOL.•“Gasiforming” reduces GWP, especially in regions where incineration is common.•“Electriforming” promises impact reduction in all nations below 200 g CO2e/kWh.•At scale, in the EU a potential GWP reduction in the Mt CO2e range is identified.</description><subject>Circular economy</subject><subject>Decision-making</subject><subject>LCA</subject><subject>Plastic waste</subject><subject>Waste-to-resource</subject><issn>0921-3449</issn><issn>1879-0658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1KAzEUhYMoWKvPYF5gajKZZCbuSqk_UFBQ1yHJ3GlTOpOSpBVXvrqpLW5dXTic83HuQeiWkgklVNytJwGi9UMAOylJWWW1FpydoRFtalkQwZtzNCKypAWrKnmJrmJcE0JYI9kIfc98v9XBDUucVoDtxvU6AXZZtAn7DveQVnrwG7wNvt3Z5PyA3YDnu-C3cI_fEuj-ZAIcoPOhP8D2cYJfNzomZ_FnPoCXOrrOWf1LyDALMUK8Rhed3kS4Od0x-niYv8-eisXL4_NsuigsE1UqGk6IJK2hsmOiESWVlhlueM0FtQCEG2p4a0qtBTHcSsO05LyqjTUNq4VkY1QfuTb4GHNPtQ351fClKFGHHdVa_e2oDjuq4445OT0mIdfbOwgqWgeDhdZla1Ktd_8yfgCUO4Mb</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Prifti, Kristiano</creator><creator>Lechtenberg, Fabian</creator><creator>Manenti, Flavio</creator><creator>Espuña, Antonio</creator><creator>Graells, Moisès</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-2191</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-1178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-634X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Comparing the climate impact of methanol production in Europe: Steam methane reforming vs. Plastic waste gasification processes</title><author>Prifti, Kristiano ; Lechtenberg, Fabian ; Manenti, Flavio ; Espuña, Antonio ; Graells, Moisès</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-850090db19f3686219c3b5b57561cee05b1b5db2aa60b5c9b3a95547bcb837693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Circular economy</topic><topic>Decision-making</topic><topic>LCA</topic><topic>Plastic waste</topic><topic>Waste-to-resource</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prifti, Kristiano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lechtenberg, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manenti, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espuña, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graells, Moisès</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prifti, Kristiano</au><au>Lechtenberg, Fabian</au><au>Manenti, Flavio</au><au>Espuña, Antonio</au><au>Graells, Moisès</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the climate impact of methanol production in Europe: Steam methane reforming vs. Plastic waste gasification processes</atitle><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>208</volume><spage>107653</spage><pages>107653-</pages><artnum>107653</artnum><issn>0921-3449</issn><eissn>1879-0658</eissn><abstract>This study compares the climate change impacts of three methanol production processes: the conventional method via steam methane reforming, and two alternatives – gasiforming and electriforming – which utilize plastic waste as feedstock. A gate-to-gate LCA approach is employed, considering credits and substitution impacts for avoiding traditional end-of-life treatment of plastic waste. Influential local parameters for GWP reduction are identified to include electricity carbon footprint, waste treatment infrastructure, incinerator efficiency, and the utilization of captured CO2 streams. Regional conditions are found to be crucial, as demonstrated by a case study comparing technology choices among EU27+3 countries. The study concludes that the novel plastic waste treatment and methanol production processes, have the potential to mitigate climate change impact, particularly when diverting plastic waste from incineration. With carbon-neutral electricity and avoided incineration, the specific impact reduction in methanol production can reach 2 kg CO2e per kg methanol. [Display omitted] •Gasification of mixed plastic waste can be used to decarbonize methanol consumption.•Sustainability hinges on regional electricity footprint and the plastic’s original EOL.•“Gasiforming” reduces GWP, especially in regions where incineration is common.•“Electriforming” promises impact reduction in all nations below 200 g CO2e/kWh.•At scale, in the EU a potential GWP reduction in the Mt CO2e range is identified.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107653</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0553-2191</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3659-1178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-634X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-3449
ispartof Resources, conservation and recycling, 2024-09, Vol.208, p.107653, Article 107653
issn 0921-3449
1879-0658
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2024_107653
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Circular economy
Decision-making
LCA
Plastic waste
Waste-to-resource
title Comparing the climate impact of methanol production in Europe: Steam methane reforming vs. Plastic waste gasification processes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T04%3A43%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20climate%20impact%20of%20methanol%20production%20in%20Europe:%20Steam%20methane%20reforming%20vs.%20Plastic%20waste%20gasification%20processes&rft.jtitle=Resources,%20conservation%20and%20recycling&rft.au=Prifti,%20Kristiano&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=208&rft.spage=107653&rft.pages=107653-&rft.artnum=107653&rft.issn=0921-3449&rft.eissn=1879-0658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107653&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0921344924002477%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-850090db19f3686219c3b5b57561cee05b1b5db2aa60b5c9b3a95547bcb837693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true