Loading…

Environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling and energy recovery pathways in the EU

•LCA and LCC are applied to assess the impacts of plastic waste management.•We compare mechanical recycling, physical recycling, chemical recycling and energy recovery.•Physical and chemical recycling outperform energy recovery on climate change.•A clear ranking cannot be established amongst mechani...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resources, conservation and recycling conservation and recycling, 2025-04, Vol.215, p.108099, Article 108099
Main Authors: García-Gutiérrez, Pelayo, Amadei, Andrea Martino, Klenert, David, Nessi, Simone, Tonini, Davide, Tosches, Davide, Ardente, Fulvio, Saveyn, Hans G.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1069-62ab2c7431b638f29fe64c66a53bf661510830fe16d16b686198c807b6701bd33
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108099
container_title Resources, conservation and recycling
container_volume 215
creator García-Gutiérrez, Pelayo
Amadei, Andrea Martino
Klenert, David
Nessi, Simone
Tonini, Davide
Tosches, Davide
Ardente, Fulvio
Saveyn, Hans G.M.
description •LCA and LCC are applied to assess the impacts of plastic waste management.•We compare mechanical recycling, physical recycling, chemical recycling and energy recovery.•Physical and chemical recycling outperform energy recovery on climate change.•A clear ranking cannot be established amongst mechanical, physical and chemical recycling.•Acknowledging costs uncertainty, recycling of plastic waste needs support to be competitive with energy recovery. Physical and chemical recycling technologies are seen as key to increasing plastic recycling, although their potential environmental and economic impacts are not yet fully understood. This study provides a comparative environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling (mechanical, physical, chemical) and energy recovery, using primary data complemented with external information. Our findings suggest that for climate change mitigation, physical or chemical recycling constitute better alternative for processing plastic waste currently sent to energy recovery or landfill. This preference does not hold true for other impact categories given the current EU energy mix, but it is likely to apply in a future cleaner EU energy system. A clear ranking could not be established amongst mechanical, physical and chemical recycling as their environmental performance depends on the specific plastic waste fraction treated. The same applies for costs. The findings of this study can be used to support policy makers and businesses in their decision-making by establishing whether either recycling (mechanical, physical, chemical) or energy recovery of plastic waste are the preferred solution from an environmental and economic point of view. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108099
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2024_108099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092134492400689X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S092134492400689X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1069-62ab2c7431b638f29fe64c66a53bf661510830fe16d16b686198c807b6701bd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1qwzAQhbVooWnaM1QXcCpZzthahpD-QKCbZi1keeQoOHKQTIJvXxmXbrsaeDPvzcxHyAtnK844vJ5WAaPpfUCzylleJLViUt6RBZM5z0RRyAfyGOOJMSYqKRak3fmrC70_ox90R7VvKKaA_uwM1TFijFOH9pZeOh2HpN5SQZo2jKZzvp0tHkM7TmJ_xTDSix6ONz1G6jwdjkh3hydyb3UX8fm3Lsnhbfe9_cj2X--f280-M5yBzCDXdW7KQvAaRGVzaREKA6DXorYAfJ0eEswih4ZDDRVwWZmKlTWUjNeNEEtSzrkm9DEGtOoS3FmHUXGmJkbqpP4YqYmRmhkl52Z2Yjrv6jCoaBx6g41Lo4Nqevdvxg_HaneX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling and energy recovery pathways in the EU</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>García-Gutiérrez, Pelayo ; Amadei, Andrea Martino ; Klenert, David ; Nessi, Simone ; Tonini, Davide ; Tosches, Davide ; Ardente, Fulvio ; Saveyn, Hans G.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>García-Gutiérrez, Pelayo ; Amadei, Andrea Martino ; Klenert, David ; Nessi, Simone ; Tonini, Davide ; Tosches, Davide ; Ardente, Fulvio ; Saveyn, Hans G.M.</creatorcontrib><description>•LCA and LCC are applied to assess the impacts of plastic waste management.•We compare mechanical recycling, physical recycling, chemical recycling and energy recovery.•Physical and chemical recycling outperform energy recovery on climate change.•A clear ranking cannot be established amongst mechanical, physical and chemical recycling.•Acknowledging costs uncertainty, recycling of plastic waste needs support to be competitive with energy recovery. Physical and chemical recycling technologies are seen as key to increasing plastic recycling, although their potential environmental and economic impacts are not yet fully understood. This study provides a comparative environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling (mechanical, physical, chemical) and energy recovery, using primary data complemented with external information. Our findings suggest that for climate change mitigation, physical or chemical recycling constitute better alternative for processing plastic waste currently sent to energy recovery or landfill. This preference does not hold true for other impact categories given the current EU energy mix, but it is likely to apply in a future cleaner EU energy system. A clear ranking could not be established amongst mechanical, physical and chemical recycling as their environmental performance depends on the specific plastic waste fraction treated. The same applies for costs. The findings of this study can be used to support policy makers and businesses in their decision-making by establishing whether either recycling (mechanical, physical, chemical) or energy recovery of plastic waste are the preferred solution from an environmental and economic point of view. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-3449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Chemical recycling ; Energy recovery ; Life cycle assessment ; Mechanical recycling ; Physical recycling ; Plastic waste</subject><ispartof>Resources, conservation and recycling, 2025-04, Vol.215, p.108099, Article 108099</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1069-62ab2c7431b638f29fe64c66a53bf661510830fe16d16b686198c807b6701bd33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7362-2108 ; 0009-0000-0455-3743</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>García-Gutiérrez, Pelayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amadei, Andrea Martino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klenert, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nessi, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonini, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tosches, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardente, Fulvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saveyn, Hans G.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling and energy recovery pathways in the EU</title><title>Resources, conservation and recycling</title><description>•LCA and LCC are applied to assess the impacts of plastic waste management.•We compare mechanical recycling, physical recycling, chemical recycling and energy recovery.•Physical and chemical recycling outperform energy recovery on climate change.•A clear ranking cannot be established amongst mechanical, physical and chemical recycling.•Acknowledging costs uncertainty, recycling of plastic waste needs support to be competitive with energy recovery. Physical and chemical recycling technologies are seen as key to increasing plastic recycling, although their potential environmental and economic impacts are not yet fully understood. This study provides a comparative environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling (mechanical, physical, chemical) and energy recovery, using primary data complemented with external information. Our findings suggest that for climate change mitigation, physical or chemical recycling constitute better alternative for processing plastic waste currently sent to energy recovery or landfill. This preference does not hold true for other impact categories given the current EU energy mix, but it is likely to apply in a future cleaner EU energy system. A clear ranking could not be established amongst mechanical, physical and chemical recycling as their environmental performance depends on the specific plastic waste fraction treated. The same applies for costs. The findings of this study can be used to support policy makers and businesses in their decision-making by establishing whether either recycling (mechanical, physical, chemical) or energy recovery of plastic waste are the preferred solution from an environmental and economic point of view. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Chemical recycling</subject><subject>Energy recovery</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Mechanical recycling</subject><subject>Physical recycling</subject><subject>Plastic waste</subject><issn>0921-3449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1qwzAQhbVooWnaM1QXcCpZzthahpD-QKCbZi1keeQoOHKQTIJvXxmXbrsaeDPvzcxHyAtnK844vJ5WAaPpfUCzylleJLViUt6RBZM5z0RRyAfyGOOJMSYqKRak3fmrC70_ox90R7VvKKaA_uwM1TFijFOH9pZeOh2HpN5SQZo2jKZzvp0tHkM7TmJ_xTDSix6ONz1G6jwdjkh3hydyb3UX8fm3Lsnhbfe9_cj2X--f280-M5yBzCDXdW7KQvAaRGVzaREKA6DXorYAfJ0eEswih4ZDDRVwWZmKlTWUjNeNEEtSzrkm9DEGtOoS3FmHUXGmJkbqpP4YqYmRmhkl52Z2Yjrv6jCoaBx6g41Lo4Nqevdvxg_HaneX</recordid><startdate>202504</startdate><enddate>202504</enddate><creator>García-Gutiérrez, Pelayo</creator><creator>Amadei, Andrea Martino</creator><creator>Klenert, David</creator><creator>Nessi, Simone</creator><creator>Tonini, Davide</creator><creator>Tosches, Davide</creator><creator>Ardente, Fulvio</creator><creator>Saveyn, Hans G.M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7362-2108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0455-3743</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202504</creationdate><title>Environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling and energy recovery pathways in the EU</title><author>García-Gutiérrez, Pelayo ; Amadei, Andrea Martino ; Klenert, David ; Nessi, Simone ; Tonini, Davide ; Tosches, Davide ; Ardente, Fulvio ; Saveyn, Hans G.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1069-62ab2c7431b638f29fe64c66a53bf661510830fe16d16b686198c807b6701bd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Chemical recycling</topic><topic>Energy recovery</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Mechanical recycling</topic><topic>Physical recycling</topic><topic>Plastic waste</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>García-Gutiérrez, Pelayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amadei, Andrea Martino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klenert, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nessi, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonini, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tosches, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardente, Fulvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saveyn, Hans G.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>García-Gutiérrez, Pelayo</au><au>Amadei, Andrea Martino</au><au>Klenert, David</au><au>Nessi, Simone</au><au>Tonini, Davide</au><au>Tosches, Davide</au><au>Ardente, Fulvio</au><au>Saveyn, Hans G.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling and energy recovery pathways in the EU</atitle><jtitle>Resources, conservation and recycling</jtitle><date>2025-04</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>215</volume><spage>108099</spage><pages>108099-</pages><artnum>108099</artnum><issn>0921-3449</issn><abstract>•LCA and LCC are applied to assess the impacts of plastic waste management.•We compare mechanical recycling, physical recycling, chemical recycling and energy recovery.•Physical and chemical recycling outperform energy recovery on climate change.•A clear ranking cannot be established amongst mechanical, physical and chemical recycling.•Acknowledging costs uncertainty, recycling of plastic waste needs support to be competitive with energy recovery. Physical and chemical recycling technologies are seen as key to increasing plastic recycling, although their potential environmental and economic impacts are not yet fully understood. This study provides a comparative environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling (mechanical, physical, chemical) and energy recovery, using primary data complemented with external information. Our findings suggest that for climate change mitigation, physical or chemical recycling constitute better alternative for processing plastic waste currently sent to energy recovery or landfill. This preference does not hold true for other impact categories given the current EU energy mix, but it is likely to apply in a future cleaner EU energy system. A clear ranking could not be established amongst mechanical, physical and chemical recycling as their environmental performance depends on the specific plastic waste fraction treated. The same applies for costs. The findings of this study can be used to support policy makers and businesses in their decision-making by establishing whether either recycling (mechanical, physical, chemical) or energy recovery of plastic waste are the preferred solution from an environmental and economic point of view. [Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108099</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7362-2108</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0455-3743</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-3449
ispartof Resources, conservation and recycling, 2025-04, Vol.215, p.108099, Article 108099
issn 0921-3449
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2024_108099
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Chemical recycling
Energy recovery
Life cycle assessment
Mechanical recycling
Physical recycling
Plastic waste
title Environmental and economic assessment of plastic waste recycling and energy recovery pathways in the EU
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T10%3A26%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20and%20economic%20assessment%20of%20plastic%20waste%20recycling%20and%20energy%20recovery%20pathways%20in%20the%20EU&rft.jtitle=Resources,%20conservation%20and%20recycling&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Guti%C3%A9rrez,%20Pelayo&rft.date=2025-04&rft.volume=215&rft.spage=108099&rft.pages=108099-&rft.artnum=108099&rft.issn=0921-3449&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108099&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES092134492400689X%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1069-62ab2c7431b638f29fe64c66a53bf661510830fe16d16b686198c807b6701bd33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true