Balancing the radical and the incremental: CEO affiliative humor and organizational ambidexterity

Organizational ambidexterity is positively associated with firm performance. Yet, it is difficult for CEOs to implement ambidextrous strategies as the radical and incremental innovations that underlie ambidexterity are seemingly incongruous. As such, an important task for both scholars and practitio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research policy 2025-01, Vol.54 (1), p.105131, Article 105131
Main Authors: Campbell, Robert J., Short, Cole E., Graffin, Scott D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
CEOs
Corporate governance
Organizational ambidexterity
Panel data
Strategic leadership
Upper echelons theory
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Organizational ambidexterity is positively associated with firm performance. Yet, it is difficult for CEOs to implement ambidextrous strategies as the radical and incremental innovations that underlie ambidexterity are seemingly incongruous. As such, an important task for both scholars and practitioners involves discerning which factors influence organizational ambidexterity. Building on incongruity theory, we address this puzzle by focusing on CEO affiliative humor, establishing its link with ambidexterity, and further developing and testing theory related to boundary conditions. Through videometric analysis of executive interviews, textual analysis of quarterly earnings calls, and a series of supplemental tests, we offer robust evidence for our study's key relationships. Our study thus makes several contributions, including shedding light on a new pathway—CEO affiliative humor—through which firms can carry out and manage the radical and incremental innovations that underlie ambidexterity, as well by highlighting the complementary role of the CEO-director interface in this regard. •We illuminate the link between CEO affiliative humor and organizational ambidexterity.•We establish the role of shared director tenure and director busyness as key moderators of this relationship.•Through extensive videometric, textual, and supplemental analyses, we empirically test these relationships.
ISSN:0048-7333
DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2024.105131