Loading…

Does board diversity mitigate risk? The effect of homophily and social ties on risk-taking in financial institutions

This study investigates whether greater board diversity and looser social network ties have an impact on board independence and risk-taking in US financial institutions from 2010 to 2022.The econometric strategy involved structural equation models, where risk as a dependent variable was measured by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research in international business and finance 2024-06, Vol.70, p.102306, Article 102306
Main Authors: Alzayed, Noora, Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo, Eskandari, Rasol
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7742b17eb254d008c0dca0cd99421306deb175617c33ada26a9ae040ef792d9e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7742b17eb254d008c0dca0cd99421306deb175617c33ada26a9ae040ef792d9e3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102306
container_title Research in international business and finance
container_volume 70
creator Alzayed, Noora
Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo
Eskandari, Rasol
description This study investigates whether greater board diversity and looser social network ties have an impact on board independence and risk-taking in US financial institutions from 2010 to 2022.The econometric strategy involved structural equation models, where risk as a dependent variable was measured by two latent variables and a total of five measures of risk. Several aspects of board diversity were utilized including gender, social, experience and educational backgrounds. The findings suggested that diversity in nationality had a significant positive effect, while age and gender diversity had a minor effect on mitigating risk. Two measures of educational diversity had mixed results while suggesting that financial education is associated with greater risk. Also, social networks had a significant effect on risk-taking, especially on market risk. The study highlights the importance of maintaining a sensible level of board diversity across all aspects to avoid issues of cohesion and poor communication. This implication arises from the conclusion that too diverse a board might suffer from the lack of cohesion and communication, while a board with very low diversity will not be able to benefit from diverse backgrounds and expertise. Results from this study recommend incorporating social networking requirements in defining the independence of directors. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102306
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ribaf_2024_102306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0275531924000990</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0275531924000990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7742b17eb254d008c0dca0cd99421306deb175617c33ada26a9ae040ef792d9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKQzEQhoMoWKtP4CYvcGou57oQkXqFgpu6DjnJpJ1ekpLEQt_e09a1q4GZ-X5mPkLuOZtwxuuH1SRir91EMFEOHSFZfUFGvG3aQsq2vCQjJpqqqCTvrslNSivGRMe4GJH8EiDRPuhoqcU9xIT5QLeYcaEz0Ihp_UTnS6DgHJhMg6PLsA27JW4OVHtLUzCoNzTjEBP8CSiyXqNfUPTUodf-tIA-Zcw_GYNPt-TK6U2Cu786Jt9vr_PpRzH7ev-cPs8KIxuZi6YpRc8b6EVVWsZaw6zRzNiuKwUfXrQwTKuaN0ZKbbWodaeBlQxc0wnbgRwTec41MaQUwaldxK2OB8WZOopTK3USp47i1FncQD2eKRhO2yNElQyCN2AxDgqUDfgv_wsX8Xma</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does board diversity mitigate risk? The effect of homophily and social ties on risk-taking in financial institutions</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Alzayed, Noora ; Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo ; Eskandari, Rasol</creator><creatorcontrib>Alzayed, Noora ; Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo ; Eskandari, Rasol</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates whether greater board diversity and looser social network ties have an impact on board independence and risk-taking in US financial institutions from 2010 to 2022.The econometric strategy involved structural equation models, where risk as a dependent variable was measured by two latent variables and a total of five measures of risk. Several aspects of board diversity were utilized including gender, social, experience and educational backgrounds. The findings suggested that diversity in nationality had a significant positive effect, while age and gender diversity had a minor effect on mitigating risk. Two measures of educational diversity had mixed results while suggesting that financial education is associated with greater risk. Also, social networks had a significant effect on risk-taking, especially on market risk. The study highlights the importance of maintaining a sensible level of board diversity across all aspects to avoid issues of cohesion and poor communication. This implication arises from the conclusion that too diverse a board might suffer from the lack of cohesion and communication, while a board with very low diversity will not be able to benefit from diverse backgrounds and expertise. Results from this study recommend incorporating social networking requirements in defining the independence of directors. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3384</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Board diversity ; Financial institutions ; Risk taking ; Social networks ; Structural equation model</subject><ispartof>Research in international business and finance, 2024-06, Vol.70, p.102306, Article 102306</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7742b17eb254d008c0dca0cd99421306deb175617c33ada26a9ae040ef792d9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7742b17eb254d008c0dca0cd99421306deb175617c33ada26a9ae040ef792d9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alzayed, Noora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskandari, Rasol</creatorcontrib><title>Does board diversity mitigate risk? The effect of homophily and social ties on risk-taking in financial institutions</title><title>Research in international business and finance</title><description>This study investigates whether greater board diversity and looser social network ties have an impact on board independence and risk-taking in US financial institutions from 2010 to 2022.The econometric strategy involved structural equation models, where risk as a dependent variable was measured by two latent variables and a total of five measures of risk. Several aspects of board diversity were utilized including gender, social, experience and educational backgrounds. The findings suggested that diversity in nationality had a significant positive effect, while age and gender diversity had a minor effect on mitigating risk. Two measures of educational diversity had mixed results while suggesting that financial education is associated with greater risk. Also, social networks had a significant effect on risk-taking, especially on market risk. The study highlights the importance of maintaining a sensible level of board diversity across all aspects to avoid issues of cohesion and poor communication. This implication arises from the conclusion that too diverse a board might suffer from the lack of cohesion and communication, while a board with very low diversity will not be able to benefit from diverse backgrounds and expertise. Results from this study recommend incorporating social networking requirements in defining the independence of directors. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Board diversity</subject><subject>Financial institutions</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Structural equation model</subject><issn>0275-5319</issn><issn>1878-3384</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKQzEQhoMoWKtP4CYvcGou57oQkXqFgpu6DjnJpJ1ekpLEQt_e09a1q4GZ-X5mPkLuOZtwxuuH1SRir91EMFEOHSFZfUFGvG3aQsq2vCQjJpqqqCTvrslNSivGRMe4GJH8EiDRPuhoqcU9xIT5QLeYcaEz0Ihp_UTnS6DgHJhMg6PLsA27JW4OVHtLUzCoNzTjEBP8CSiyXqNfUPTUodf-tIA-Zcw_GYNPt-TK6U2Cu786Jt9vr_PpRzH7ev-cPs8KIxuZi6YpRc8b6EVVWsZaw6zRzNiuKwUfXrQwTKuaN0ZKbbWodaeBlQxc0wnbgRwTec41MaQUwaldxK2OB8WZOopTK3USp47i1FncQD2eKRhO2yNElQyCN2AxDgqUDfgv_wsX8Xma</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Alzayed, Noora</creator><creator>Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo</creator><creator>Eskandari, Rasol</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Does board diversity mitigate risk? The effect of homophily and social ties on risk-taking in financial institutions</title><author>Alzayed, Noora ; Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo ; Eskandari, Rasol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7742b17eb254d008c0dca0cd99421306deb175617c33ada26a9ae040ef792d9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Board diversity</topic><topic>Financial institutions</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Structural equation model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alzayed, Noora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskandari, Rasol</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Research in international business and finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alzayed, Noora</au><au>Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo</au><au>Eskandari, Rasol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does board diversity mitigate risk? The effect of homophily and social ties on risk-taking in financial institutions</atitle><jtitle>Research in international business and finance</jtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>70</volume><spage>102306</spage><pages>102306-</pages><artnum>102306</artnum><issn>0275-5319</issn><eissn>1878-3384</eissn><abstract>This study investigates whether greater board diversity and looser social network ties have an impact on board independence and risk-taking in US financial institutions from 2010 to 2022.The econometric strategy involved structural equation models, where risk as a dependent variable was measured by two latent variables and a total of five measures of risk. Several aspects of board diversity were utilized including gender, social, experience and educational backgrounds. The findings suggested that diversity in nationality had a significant positive effect, while age and gender diversity had a minor effect on mitigating risk. Two measures of educational diversity had mixed results while suggesting that financial education is associated with greater risk. Also, social networks had a significant effect on risk-taking, especially on market risk. The study highlights the importance of maintaining a sensible level of board diversity across all aspects to avoid issues of cohesion and poor communication. This implication arises from the conclusion that too diverse a board might suffer from the lack of cohesion and communication, while a board with very low diversity will not be able to benefit from diverse backgrounds and expertise. Results from this study recommend incorporating social networking requirements in defining the independence of directors. [Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102306</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-5319
ispartof Research in international business and finance, 2024-06, Vol.70, p.102306, Article 102306
issn 0275-5319
1878-3384
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ribaf_2024_102306
source Elsevier
subjects Board diversity
Financial institutions
Risk taking
Social networks
Structural equation model
title Does board diversity mitigate risk? The effect of homophily and social ties on risk-taking in financial institutions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T01%3A46%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20board%20diversity%20mitigate%20risk?%20The%20effect%20of%20homophily%20and%20social%20ties%20on%20risk-taking%20in%20financial%20institutions&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20international%20business%20and%20finance&rft.au=Alzayed,%20Noora&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=70&rft.spage=102306&rft.pages=102306-&rft.artnum=102306&rft.issn=0275-5319&rft.eissn=1878-3384&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102306&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0275531924000990%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7742b17eb254d008c0dca0cd99421306deb175617c33ada26a9ae040ef792d9e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true