Loading…

More than just a special case: The value of double bind theory for bringing light into the dark side of organizational paradoxes

In their recently published article, Berti and Simpson introduced a comprehensive framework for the systematic analysis of the dark side of organizational paradoxes. While I follow the authors in connecting the analysis of this dark side to types of organizational power, I am concerned with the narr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian journal of management 2022-06, Vol.38 (2), p.101198, Article 101198
Main Author: Julmi, Christian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-f1e822d32654395d9624747b26f2213902c8504840bac0ea0cd332cb9011f3f03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-f1e822d32654395d9624747b26f2213902c8504840bac0ea0cd332cb9011f3f03
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 101198
container_title Scandinavian journal of management
container_volume 38
creator Julmi, Christian
description In their recently published article, Berti and Simpson introduced a comprehensive framework for the systematic analysis of the dark side of organizational paradoxes. While I follow the authors in connecting the analysis of this dark side to types of organizational power, I am concerned with the narrow view on double binds as an expression of coercions only. This narrow view not only runs counter to the basic idea of double bind theory, but also neglects or even denies transition dynamics between different types of organizational double binds. To address these issues, I develop an alternative framework for the analysis of the dark side of organizational power that considers double binds in a broader and more fruitful way. This framework not only facilitates the analysis of transition dynamics between types of double binds, but also reveals practical strategies for mitigating paradoxes and disentangling them from implicit structures that are in the blind spot of Berti and Simpson's framework. •Double binds are key to understand the dark side of organizational paradoxes.•The article develops a framework that facilitates the analysis of transitions between types of double binds.•The framework reveals strategies for mitigating paradoxes and disentangling them from implicit structures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101198
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scaman_2022_101198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956522122000057</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0956522122000057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-f1e822d32654395d9624747b26f2213902c8504840bac0ea0cd332cb9011f3f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtKAzEQhoMoWKtv4EVeYGsOe_RCkOIJKt7U65BNJm3WbVKSbbFe-ehmrdfCwMAk38_Mh9A1JTNKaHnTzaKSG-lmjDA2jmhTn6AJrSuecV5Xp2hCmqLMCsboObqIsSOEVrSqJuj71QfAw1o63O3igCWOW1BW9ljJCLd4uQa8l_0OsDdY-13bA26t0wkBHw7Y-IDbYN0qFe7taj1g6wY_PmMtwweOVv-yPqyks19ysN6l9K0MUvtPiJfozMg-wtVfn6L3x4fl_DlbvD29zO8XmeKkHDJDoWZMc1YWOW8K3ZQsr_KqZaVJR_GGMFUXJK9z0kpFQBKlOWeqbZIMww3hU5Qfc1XwMQYwYhvsRoaDoESMFkUnjhbFaFEcLSbs7ohB2m1vIaRPFpwCbQOoQWhv_w_4AdA6fXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>More than just a special case: The value of double bind theory for bringing light into the dark side of organizational paradoxes</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Julmi, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Julmi, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>In their recently published article, Berti and Simpson introduced a comprehensive framework for the systematic analysis of the dark side of organizational paradoxes. While I follow the authors in connecting the analysis of this dark side to types of organizational power, I am concerned with the narrow view on double binds as an expression of coercions only. This narrow view not only runs counter to the basic idea of double bind theory, but also neglects or even denies transition dynamics between different types of organizational double binds. To address these issues, I develop an alternative framework for the analysis of the dark side of organizational power that considers double binds in a broader and more fruitful way. This framework not only facilitates the analysis of transition dynamics between types of double binds, but also reveals practical strategies for mitigating paradoxes and disentangling them from implicit structures that are in the blind spot of Berti and Simpson's framework. •Double binds are key to understand the dark side of organizational paradoxes.•The article develops a framework that facilitates the analysis of transitions between types of double binds.•The framework reveals strategies for mitigating paradoxes and disentangling them from implicit structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-5221</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Critical management ; Double bind theory ; Doublethink ; Organizational paradoxes ; Power</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of management, 2022-06, Vol.38 (2), p.101198, Article 101198</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-f1e822d32654395d9624747b26f2213902c8504840bac0ea0cd332cb9011f3f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-f1e822d32654395d9624747b26f2213902c8504840bac0ea0cd332cb9011f3f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Julmi, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>More than just a special case: The value of double bind theory for bringing light into the dark side of organizational paradoxes</title><title>Scandinavian journal of management</title><description>In their recently published article, Berti and Simpson introduced a comprehensive framework for the systematic analysis of the dark side of organizational paradoxes. While I follow the authors in connecting the analysis of this dark side to types of organizational power, I am concerned with the narrow view on double binds as an expression of coercions only. This narrow view not only runs counter to the basic idea of double bind theory, but also neglects or even denies transition dynamics between different types of organizational double binds. To address these issues, I develop an alternative framework for the analysis of the dark side of organizational power that considers double binds in a broader and more fruitful way. This framework not only facilitates the analysis of transition dynamics between types of double binds, but also reveals practical strategies for mitigating paradoxes and disentangling them from implicit structures that are in the blind spot of Berti and Simpson's framework. •Double binds are key to understand the dark side of organizational paradoxes.•The article develops a framework that facilitates the analysis of transitions between types of double binds.•The framework reveals strategies for mitigating paradoxes and disentangling them from implicit structures.</description><subject>Critical management</subject><subject>Double bind theory</subject><subject>Doublethink</subject><subject>Organizational paradoxes</subject><subject>Power</subject><issn>0956-5221</issn><issn>1873-3387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNtKAzEQhoMoWKtv4EVeYGsOe_RCkOIJKt7U65BNJm3WbVKSbbFe-ehmrdfCwMAk38_Mh9A1JTNKaHnTzaKSG-lmjDA2jmhTn6AJrSuecV5Xp2hCmqLMCsboObqIsSOEVrSqJuj71QfAw1o63O3igCWOW1BW9ljJCLd4uQa8l_0OsDdY-13bA26t0wkBHw7Y-IDbYN0qFe7taj1g6wY_PmMtwweOVv-yPqyks19ysN6l9K0MUvtPiJfozMg-wtVfn6L3x4fl_DlbvD29zO8XmeKkHDJDoWZMc1YWOW8K3ZQsr_KqZaVJR_GGMFUXJK9z0kpFQBKlOWeqbZIMww3hU5Qfc1XwMQYwYhvsRoaDoESMFkUnjhbFaFEcLSbs7ohB2m1vIaRPFpwCbQOoQWhv_w_4AdA6fXg</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Julmi, Christian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>More than just a special case: The value of double bind theory for bringing light into the dark side of organizational paradoxes</title><author>Julmi, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-f1e822d32654395d9624747b26f2213902c8504840bac0ea0cd332cb9011f3f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Critical management</topic><topic>Double bind theory</topic><topic>Doublethink</topic><topic>Organizational paradoxes</topic><topic>Power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Julmi, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Julmi, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>More than just a special case: The value of double bind theory for bringing light into the dark side of organizational paradoxes</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of management</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101198</spage><pages>101198-</pages><artnum>101198</artnum><issn>0956-5221</issn><eissn>1873-3387</eissn><abstract>In their recently published article, Berti and Simpson introduced a comprehensive framework for the systematic analysis of the dark side of organizational paradoxes. While I follow the authors in connecting the analysis of this dark side to types of organizational power, I am concerned with the narrow view on double binds as an expression of coercions only. This narrow view not only runs counter to the basic idea of double bind theory, but also neglects or even denies transition dynamics between different types of organizational double binds. To address these issues, I develop an alternative framework for the analysis of the dark side of organizational power that considers double binds in a broader and more fruitful way. This framework not only facilitates the analysis of transition dynamics between types of double binds, but also reveals practical strategies for mitigating paradoxes and disentangling them from implicit structures that are in the blind spot of Berti and Simpson's framework. •Double binds are key to understand the dark side of organizational paradoxes.•The article develops a framework that facilitates the analysis of transitions between types of double binds.•The framework reveals strategies for mitigating paradoxes and disentangling them from implicit structures.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101198</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-5221
ispartof Scandinavian journal of management, 2022-06, Vol.38 (2), p.101198, Article 101198
issn 0956-5221
1873-3387
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scaman_2022_101198
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Critical management
Double bind theory
Doublethink
Organizational paradoxes
Power
title More than just a special case: The value of double bind theory for bringing light into the dark side of organizational paradoxes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A00%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=More%20than%20just%20a%20special%20case:%20The%20value%20of%20double%20bind%20theory%20for%20bringing%20light%20into%20the%20dark%20side%20of%20organizational%20paradoxes&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20management&rft.au=Julmi,%20Christian&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101198&rft.pages=101198-&rft.artnum=101198&rft.issn=0956-5221&rft.eissn=1873-3387&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101198&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0956522122000057%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-f1e822d32654395d9624747b26f2213902c8504840bac0ea0cd332cb9011f3f03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true