Water relations between leaf water potential, photosynthesis and agronomic vine response as a tool for establishing thresholds in irrigation scheduling

• Published in: Scientia horticulturae 2007-11, Vol.114 (3), p.151-158
• Main Authors: Baeza, Pilar, Sánchez-de-Miguel, Patricia, Centeno, Ana, Junquera, Pedro, Linares, Rubén, Lissarrague, José Ramón
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions; Biological and medical sciences; carbon dioxide; crop yield; diurnal variation; evapotranspiration; fruit crops; fruit set; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; gas exchange; General agronomy. Plant production; grape must; irrigation rates; irrigation scheduling; irrigation systems; Irrigation. Drainage; Leaf water potential; Must composition; Net CO 2 assimilation; photosynthesis; plant-water relations; Shoot growth rate; soluble solids; titratable acidity; Vitis vinifera; Vitis vinifera L; Water stress integral; wine grapes; Yield components
• ISSN: 0304-4238; 1879-1018
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.06.012

During the last few years, leaf water potential has been a useful tool in controlling vine water status. However, the time of measurement that could best explain short- and long-term vine responses remains a matter of discussion. The objectives of this work were to study the relationship between vine water status and vine performance and to determine what time of day leaf water potential is best correlated to physiological performance and agronomic vine response. The assay was conducted in Madrid, Spain. Plant material was Cabernet-Sauvignon ( Vitis vinifera L.) grafted onto SO 4. Three irrigation treatments were established: T1 was non-irrigated, and T2 and T3 were irrigated with a constant fraction of the ETo, k = 0.45 and 0.2, respectively. Vine water status was monitored through predawn, midmorning and noon leaf water potential. Their relationships with net CO 2 assimilation rate, vegetative growth rate, yield components and must composition at harvest were studied for 3 consecutive years. Shoot growth rate and net CO 2 assimilation rate were better correlated with midmorning and noon leaf water potentials – Ψ m and Ψ n – than predawn leaf water potential – Ψ pd – but all of them were significant. Shoot growth rate was zero for Ψ pd = −0.48, Ψ m = −1.12 and Ψ n = −1.18 MPa. Berry size was better correlated with the water stress integral for predawn ( S Ψ pd ) although the water stress integral for midmorning ( S Ψ m ) and noon ( S Ψ n ) performed quite well. No relationship was found between the water stress integral and TSS, total acidity or pH. Leaf water potential performed as a good parameter for determining both vine water status and agronomic response, but not for evaluating must composition.