Loading…

Sustainable urban noise monitoring network with renewable bioenergy sources: An energy cost–benefit analysis

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have emerged as solutions for developing financially viable, and environmentally friendly monitoring systems in line with the sustainable development goals. However, their long-term operating costs are commonly neglected in literature. In this study, a novel framework...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainable cities and society 2024-09, Vol.111, p.105526, Article 105526
Main Authors: Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro, Maile, Naemi, Estrada-Lopez, Johan J., Osorio-de-la-Rosa, Edith, Palma-Marrufo, Orlando, Vázquez-Castillo, Javier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-17fb84cda38debe2fd82619b873670529d40a6f5beaca52f7c6b71281a1f781f3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105526
container_title Sustainable cities and society
container_volume 111
creator Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro
Maile, Naemi
Estrada-Lopez, Johan J.
Osorio-de-la-Rosa, Edith
Palma-Marrufo, Orlando
Vázquez-Castillo, Javier
description Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have emerged as solutions for developing financially viable, and environmentally friendly monitoring systems in line with the sustainable development goals. However, their long-term operating costs are commonly neglected in literature. In this study, a novel framework for analyzing the cost–benefit trade-offs of urban noise monitoring systems is presented. The framework employs a comparative analysis of WSNs powered by bioenergy plant microbial fuel cells (PMFCs), solar photovoltaic cells, and battery sources. The network sustainability and cost–benefit effects are evaluated through the deployment of ten wireless nodes in Merida City, Mexico. The analysis of the network operational cost, the cost of upgrading technology, the system maintenance, and the battery disposal, as well as, waste savings with the bioenergy source, are considered. The analysis shows that when assessing a Long Range (LoRa) network with a PMFC bioenergy source over a 3-year period, and with a service cost set at $0.01 USD per month for each single data packet transmitted every 5 min, the investment return is attained in 8 months and delivers a profit of approximately 30% within the first year. Compared to conventional battery-powered systems, the PMFC offers significant cost savings, reducing the system cost up to 29%. •Cost–benefit analysis of LoRa networks powered by P-MFCs for urban noise monitoring.•The model reveals an investment return of ∼8 months per $0.01 USD transmitted packet.•A profit of around 30% is achieved during the first year with the bioenergy source.•Comparative cost–benefit analysis presented for alternative power sources.•The sustainable LoRa network achieved an investment return within three years.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105526
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scs_2024_105526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2210670724003524</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2210670724003524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-17fb84cda38debe2fd82619b873670529d40a6f5beaca52f7c6b71281a1f781f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEFOQjEQbYwmEuQA7nqBj235_f3oihAVExIX6rpp-6dYhNa0RcLOO3hDT2IR4tLZzLzJe5M3D6FLSoaU0OZqOUwmDRlhdcGcs-YE9RijpGoE5ad_MxHnaJDSkpTiDR3XvIf80yZl5bzSK8CbqJXHPrgEeB28yyE6v8Ae8jbEN7x1-RVH8LD9ZWsXyhwXO5zCJhpI13ji8XFlQsrfn1-6QOsyVl6tdsmlC3Rm1SrB4Nj76OXu9nk6q-aP9w_TybwyVIxzRYXVbW06NWo70MBs17JiWLdiVN7gbNzVRDWWa1BGcWaFabSgrKWKWtFSO-ojerhrYkgpgpXv0a1V3ElK5D4zuZQlM7nPTB4yK5qbgwaKsQ8HsTAceAOdi2Cy7IL7R_0DK3h4PQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sustainable urban noise monitoring network with renewable bioenergy sources: An energy cost–benefit analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro ; Maile, Naemi ; Estrada-Lopez, Johan J. ; Osorio-de-la-Rosa, Edith ; Palma-Marrufo, Orlando ; Vázquez-Castillo, Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro ; Maile, Naemi ; Estrada-Lopez, Johan J. ; Osorio-de-la-Rosa, Edith ; Palma-Marrufo, Orlando ; Vázquez-Castillo, Javier</creatorcontrib><description>Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have emerged as solutions for developing financially viable, and environmentally friendly monitoring systems in line with the sustainable development goals. However, their long-term operating costs are commonly neglected in literature. In this study, a novel framework for analyzing the cost–benefit trade-offs of urban noise monitoring systems is presented. The framework employs a comparative analysis of WSNs powered by bioenergy plant microbial fuel cells (PMFCs), solar photovoltaic cells, and battery sources. The network sustainability and cost–benefit effects are evaluated through the deployment of ten wireless nodes in Merida City, Mexico. The analysis of the network operational cost, the cost of upgrading technology, the system maintenance, and the battery disposal, as well as, waste savings with the bioenergy source, are considered. The analysis shows that when assessing a Long Range (LoRa) network with a PMFC bioenergy source over a 3-year period, and with a service cost set at $0.01 USD per month for each single data packet transmitted every 5 min, the investment return is attained in 8 months and delivers a profit of approximately 30% within the first year. Compared to conventional battery-powered systems, the PMFC offers significant cost savings, reducing the system cost up to 29%. •Cost–benefit analysis of LoRa networks powered by P-MFCs for urban noise monitoring.•The model reveals an investment return of ∼8 months per $0.01 USD transmitted packet.•A profit of around 30% is achieved during the first year with the bioenergy source.•Comparative cost–benefit analysis presented for alternative power sources.•The sustainable LoRa network achieved an investment return within three years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2210-6707</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-6715</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cost–benefit analysis ; Energy harvesting ; LoRa network ; Renewable bio-energy sources</subject><ispartof>Sustainable cities and society, 2024-09, Vol.111, p.105526, Article 105526</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-17fb84cda38debe2fd82619b873670529d40a6f5beaca52f7c6b71281a1f781f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0956-5994 ; 0000-0002-6064-0371 ; 0000-0003-4976-4928</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maile, Naemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estrada-Lopez, Johan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio-de-la-Rosa, Edith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palma-Marrufo, Orlando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vázquez-Castillo, Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Sustainable urban noise monitoring network with renewable bioenergy sources: An energy cost–benefit analysis</title><title>Sustainable cities and society</title><description>Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have emerged as solutions for developing financially viable, and environmentally friendly monitoring systems in line with the sustainable development goals. However, their long-term operating costs are commonly neglected in literature. In this study, a novel framework for analyzing the cost–benefit trade-offs of urban noise monitoring systems is presented. The framework employs a comparative analysis of WSNs powered by bioenergy plant microbial fuel cells (PMFCs), solar photovoltaic cells, and battery sources. The network sustainability and cost–benefit effects are evaluated through the deployment of ten wireless nodes in Merida City, Mexico. The analysis of the network operational cost, the cost of upgrading technology, the system maintenance, and the battery disposal, as well as, waste savings with the bioenergy source, are considered. The analysis shows that when assessing a Long Range (LoRa) network with a PMFC bioenergy source over a 3-year period, and with a service cost set at $0.01 USD per month for each single data packet transmitted every 5 min, the investment return is attained in 8 months and delivers a profit of approximately 30% within the first year. Compared to conventional battery-powered systems, the PMFC offers significant cost savings, reducing the system cost up to 29%. •Cost–benefit analysis of LoRa networks powered by P-MFCs for urban noise monitoring.•The model reveals an investment return of ∼8 months per $0.01 USD transmitted packet.•A profit of around 30% is achieved during the first year with the bioenergy source.•Comparative cost–benefit analysis presented for alternative power sources.•The sustainable LoRa network achieved an investment return within three years.</description><subject>Cost–benefit analysis</subject><subject>Energy harvesting</subject><subject>LoRa network</subject><subject>Renewable bio-energy sources</subject><issn>2210-6707</issn><issn>2210-6715</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UEFOQjEQbYwmEuQA7nqBj235_f3oihAVExIX6rpp-6dYhNa0RcLOO3hDT2IR4tLZzLzJe5M3D6FLSoaU0OZqOUwmDRlhdcGcs-YE9RijpGoE5ad_MxHnaJDSkpTiDR3XvIf80yZl5bzSK8CbqJXHPrgEeB28yyE6v8Ae8jbEN7x1-RVH8LD9ZWsXyhwXO5zCJhpI13ji8XFlQsrfn1-6QOsyVl6tdsmlC3Rm1SrB4Nj76OXu9nk6q-aP9w_TybwyVIxzRYXVbW06NWo70MBs17JiWLdiVN7gbNzVRDWWa1BGcWaFabSgrKWKWtFSO-ojerhrYkgpgpXv0a1V3ElK5D4zuZQlM7nPTB4yK5qbgwaKsQ8HsTAceAOdi2Cy7IL7R_0DK3h4PQ</recordid><startdate>20240915</startdate><enddate>20240915</enddate><creator>Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro</creator><creator>Maile, Naemi</creator><creator>Estrada-Lopez, Johan J.</creator><creator>Osorio-de-la-Rosa, Edith</creator><creator>Palma-Marrufo, Orlando</creator><creator>Vázquez-Castillo, Javier</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-5994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6064-0371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4976-4928</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240915</creationdate><title>Sustainable urban noise monitoring network with renewable bioenergy sources: An energy cost–benefit analysis</title><author>Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro ; Maile, Naemi ; Estrada-Lopez, Johan J. ; Osorio-de-la-Rosa, Edith ; Palma-Marrufo, Orlando ; Vázquez-Castillo, Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-17fb84cda38debe2fd82619b873670529d40a6f5beaca52f7c6b71281a1f781f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cost–benefit analysis</topic><topic>Energy harvesting</topic><topic>LoRa network</topic><topic>Renewable bio-energy sources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maile, Naemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estrada-Lopez, Johan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osorio-de-la-Rosa, Edith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palma-Marrufo, Orlando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vázquez-Castillo, Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Sustainable cities and society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castillo-Atoche, Alejandro</au><au>Maile, Naemi</au><au>Estrada-Lopez, Johan J.</au><au>Osorio-de-la-Rosa, Edith</au><au>Palma-Marrufo, Orlando</au><au>Vázquez-Castillo, Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sustainable urban noise monitoring network with renewable bioenergy sources: An energy cost–benefit analysis</atitle><jtitle>Sustainable cities and society</jtitle><date>2024-09-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>105526</spage><pages>105526-</pages><artnum>105526</artnum><issn>2210-6707</issn><eissn>2210-6715</eissn><abstract>Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have emerged as solutions for developing financially viable, and environmentally friendly monitoring systems in line with the sustainable development goals. However, their long-term operating costs are commonly neglected in literature. In this study, a novel framework for analyzing the cost–benefit trade-offs of urban noise monitoring systems is presented. The framework employs a comparative analysis of WSNs powered by bioenergy plant microbial fuel cells (PMFCs), solar photovoltaic cells, and battery sources. The network sustainability and cost–benefit effects are evaluated through the deployment of ten wireless nodes in Merida City, Mexico. The analysis of the network operational cost, the cost of upgrading technology, the system maintenance, and the battery disposal, as well as, waste savings with the bioenergy source, are considered. The analysis shows that when assessing a Long Range (LoRa) network with a PMFC bioenergy source over a 3-year period, and with a service cost set at $0.01 USD per month for each single data packet transmitted every 5 min, the investment return is attained in 8 months and delivers a profit of approximately 30% within the first year. Compared to conventional battery-powered systems, the PMFC offers significant cost savings, reducing the system cost up to 29%. •Cost–benefit analysis of LoRa networks powered by P-MFCs for urban noise monitoring.•The model reveals an investment return of ∼8 months per $0.01 USD transmitted packet.•A profit of around 30% is achieved during the first year with the bioenergy source.•Comparative cost–benefit analysis presented for alternative power sources.•The sustainable LoRa network achieved an investment return within three years.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.scs.2024.105526</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-5994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6064-0371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4976-4928</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2210-6707
ispartof Sustainable cities and society, 2024-09, Vol.111, p.105526, Article 105526
issn 2210-6707
2210-6715
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scs_2024_105526
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Cost–benefit analysis
Energy harvesting
LoRa network
Renewable bio-energy sources
title Sustainable urban noise monitoring network with renewable bioenergy sources: An energy cost–benefit analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A47%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sustainable%20urban%20noise%20monitoring%20network%20with%20renewable%20bioenergy%20sources:%20An%20energy%20cost%E2%80%93benefit%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Sustainable%20cities%20and%20society&rft.au=Castillo-Atoche,%20Alejandro&rft.date=2024-09-15&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=105526&rft.pages=105526-&rft.artnum=105526&rft.issn=2210-6707&rft.eissn=2210-6715&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105526&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2210670724003524%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-17fb84cda38debe2fd82619b873670529d40a6f5beaca52f7c6b71281a1f781f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true