History of ancient megathrust earthquakes beneath metropolitan Tokyo inferred from coastal lowland deposits

• Published in: Sedimentary geology 2018-02, Vol.364, p.258-272
• Main Authors: Mannen, Kazutaka, Yoong, Kim Haeng, Suzuki, Shigeru, Matsushima, Yoshiaki, Ota, Yuki, Kain, Claire L., Goff, James
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Kanto Earthquake; Marine terrace; Megathrust earthquake; Sagami Trough; Tidal flat; Tokyo
• ISSN: 0037-0738
• DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2017.11.014

Metropolitan Tokyo is located directly above a subduction zone that has generated two megathrust earthquakes in the past 300years. However, the timing of older megathrusts on this margin is poorly understood. In this study, we aim to constrain the timings of past megathrust earthquakes, using coastal stratigraphy, paleoecology, radiocarbon dating and archaeological records from coastal lowlands. An investigation of 13 boreholes in the southern coastal area of metropolitan Tokyo found evidence for 4m of uplift in a 6000-year period. However, we found that net vertical displacement in the last 1000years is approximately zero. Results suggest that preservation of usually ephemeral lagoon sediments occurred on three occasions in the past 1000years, and radiocarbon dating results show that the timings of these preservation episodes are close to that of major historical earthquakes. We thus attribute the intermittent preservation of the ephemeral lagoon deposits to coseismic uplift caused by the megathrust earthquakes. The candidates of the megathrust earthquakes are events that took place in 1703 CE, the 13th century, and 878 CE. Since these events produced no net vertical displacement due to inter-seismic subsidence, we propose that earthquakes responsible for long-term uplift of this region took place prior to the 9th century. This research also demonstrates the value of preserved intertidal sediments as paleoseismological archives where net tectonic displacement is neutral. •Ages of ancient Kanto Earthquakes (KE) are constrained for the first time.•KEs in the latest 1000years caused no permanent vertical displacement of this region.•Ephemeral inter-tidal deposits seem to retain a history of uplift.•An unknown event before the 9th century caused permanent uplift of the region.