Loading…

Removal of chemical oxygen demand from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid cleaning wastewater with electrochemical treatment

[Display omitted] •The COD removal efficiency can get 94.63% by electrochemical treatment.•Externally adding H2O2 combined electro-coagulation and electro-peroxidation.•Established a model using a central composite design to check the effects of parameters.•The relationships among parameters affecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Separation and purification technology 2021-07, Vol.267, p.118651, Article 118651
Main Authors: Tong, Jiaxin, Zhu, Zhiping, Yang, Yusi, Jiang, Yuankang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-fce587a268f3597fb85c75da3d2091e5993d4155f61486ff106943c6c31c04813
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-fce587a268f3597fb85c75da3d2091e5993d4155f61486ff106943c6c31c04813
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 118651
container_title Separation and purification technology
container_volume 267
creator Tong, Jiaxin
Zhu, Zhiping
Yang, Yusi
Jiang, Yuankang
description [Display omitted] •The COD removal efficiency can get 94.63% by electrochemical treatment.•Externally adding H2O2 combined electro-coagulation and electro-peroxidation.•Established a model using a central composite design to check the effects of parameters.•The relationships among parameters affecting removal efficiency were proposed.•Analyzed and deduced the EDTA degradation mechanism. Removing chemical oxygen demand (COD) from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) cleaning wastewater is difficult. In this study, an electrochemical treatment device was designed to condition EDTA cleaning wastewater, which mainly consisted of direct current (DC) power supply, iron anode, aluminum cathode, and magnetic stirrer. Four parameters, namely, initial pH, inter-electrode distance, current density, and H2O2 concentration, were investigated. The best COD removal efficiency of 86.31% in single-factor experiments was obtained at initial pH of 5, inter-electrode distance of 2 cm, current density of 60 A/m2, and H2O2 concentration of 30 mmol/L. On the basis of single-factor experimental results, a model with a methodological strategy was established using a central composite design to check these factors and their effects. The model described the changes of COD removal efficiency according to the same four parameters. The ranges for the initial pH, inter-electrode distance, current density, and H2O2 concentration are 3–5, 1–3 cm, 40–60 A/m2, and 20–40 mmol/L, respectively. The optimum conditions could be obtained from the model, which are 4.4, 1.5 cm, 52.8 A/m2 and 38.0 mmol/L, whose COD removal efficiency was 94.63%, and relative importance of parameters was in the order: current density > H2O2 concentration > initial pH > inter-electrode distance. FTIR and MS were performed to indent the intermediate products formed during this process and XRD was performed to indent the precipitates, a possible degradation pathway and mechanism of EDTA were proposed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118651
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_seppur_2021_118651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1383586621003634</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1383586621003634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-fce587a268f3597fb85c75da3d2091e5993d4155f61486ff106943c6c31c04813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoOI6-gYu8QGtu06TpRpDBPxAE0XWIyc1Mhv4MaZyxb2-HiktX92zOx7kfIdfAcmAgb7b5gLvdV8wLVkAOoKSAE7IAVfGMV3V5OmWueCaUlOfkYhi2jEEFqliQ8Q3bfm8a2ntqN9gGe8zf4xo76rA1naM-9i3FtBkb7NAF04YOE6ZojMUULDU2OGobNF3o1vRghoQHkzDSQ0gbig3aFPs_dopoUotduiRn3jQDXv3eJfl4uH9fPWUvr4_Pq7uXzHImU-YtClWZQirPRV35TyVsJZzhrmA1oKhr7koQwksolfQemKxLbqXlYFmpgC9JOXNt7Ichote7GFoTRw1MH_XprZ716aM-PeubardzDadt-4BRDzZgZycDcfpIuz78D_gBRtR-Gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Removal of chemical oxygen demand from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid cleaning wastewater with electrochemical treatment</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Tong, Jiaxin ; Zhu, Zhiping ; Yang, Yusi ; Jiang, Yuankang</creator><creatorcontrib>Tong, Jiaxin ; Zhu, Zhiping ; Yang, Yusi ; Jiang, Yuankang</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •The COD removal efficiency can get 94.63% by electrochemical treatment.•Externally adding H2O2 combined electro-coagulation and electro-peroxidation.•Established a model using a central composite design to check the effects of parameters.•The relationships among parameters affecting removal efficiency were proposed.•Analyzed and deduced the EDTA degradation mechanism. Removing chemical oxygen demand (COD) from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) cleaning wastewater is difficult. In this study, an electrochemical treatment device was designed to condition EDTA cleaning wastewater, which mainly consisted of direct current (DC) power supply, iron anode, aluminum cathode, and magnetic stirrer. Four parameters, namely, initial pH, inter-electrode distance, current density, and H2O2 concentration, were investigated. The best COD removal efficiency of 86.31% in single-factor experiments was obtained at initial pH of 5, inter-electrode distance of 2 cm, current density of 60 A/m2, and H2O2 concentration of 30 mmol/L. On the basis of single-factor experimental results, a model with a methodological strategy was established using a central composite design to check these factors and their effects. The model described the changes of COD removal efficiency according to the same four parameters. The ranges for the initial pH, inter-electrode distance, current density, and H2O2 concentration are 3–5, 1–3 cm, 40–60 A/m2, and 20–40 mmol/L, respectively. The optimum conditions could be obtained from the model, which are 4.4, 1.5 cm, 52.8 A/m2 and 38.0 mmol/L, whose COD removal efficiency was 94.63%, and relative importance of parameters was in the order: current density &gt; H2O2 concentration &gt; initial pH &gt; inter-electrode distance. FTIR and MS were performed to indent the intermediate products formed during this process and XRD was performed to indent the precipitates, a possible degradation pathway and mechanism of EDTA were proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1383-5866</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118651</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Central composite design ; COD ; EDTA cleaning wastewater ; Electrochemical treatment ; Single-factor experiment</subject><ispartof>Separation and purification technology, 2021-07, Vol.267, p.118651, Article 118651</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-fce587a268f3597fb85c75da3d2091e5993d4155f61486ff106943c6c31c04813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-fce587a268f3597fb85c75da3d2091e5993d4155f61486ff106943c6c31c04813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tong, Jiaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Zhiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yusi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yuankang</creatorcontrib><title>Removal of chemical oxygen demand from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid cleaning wastewater with electrochemical treatment</title><title>Separation and purification technology</title><description>[Display omitted] •The COD removal efficiency can get 94.63% by electrochemical treatment.•Externally adding H2O2 combined electro-coagulation and electro-peroxidation.•Established a model using a central composite design to check the effects of parameters.•The relationships among parameters affecting removal efficiency were proposed.•Analyzed and deduced the EDTA degradation mechanism. Removing chemical oxygen demand (COD) from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) cleaning wastewater is difficult. In this study, an electrochemical treatment device was designed to condition EDTA cleaning wastewater, which mainly consisted of direct current (DC) power supply, iron anode, aluminum cathode, and magnetic stirrer. Four parameters, namely, initial pH, inter-electrode distance, current density, and H2O2 concentration, were investigated. The best COD removal efficiency of 86.31% in single-factor experiments was obtained at initial pH of 5, inter-electrode distance of 2 cm, current density of 60 A/m2, and H2O2 concentration of 30 mmol/L. On the basis of single-factor experimental results, a model with a methodological strategy was established using a central composite design to check these factors and their effects. The model described the changes of COD removal efficiency according to the same four parameters. The ranges for the initial pH, inter-electrode distance, current density, and H2O2 concentration are 3–5, 1–3 cm, 40–60 A/m2, and 20–40 mmol/L, respectively. The optimum conditions could be obtained from the model, which are 4.4, 1.5 cm, 52.8 A/m2 and 38.0 mmol/L, whose COD removal efficiency was 94.63%, and relative importance of parameters was in the order: current density &gt; H2O2 concentration &gt; initial pH &gt; inter-electrode distance. FTIR and MS were performed to indent the intermediate products formed during this process and XRD was performed to indent the precipitates, a possible degradation pathway and mechanism of EDTA were proposed.</description><subject>Central composite design</subject><subject>COD</subject><subject>EDTA cleaning wastewater</subject><subject>Electrochemical treatment</subject><subject>Single-factor experiment</subject><issn>1383-5866</issn><issn>1873-3794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoOI6-gYu8QGtu06TpRpDBPxAE0XWIyc1Mhv4MaZyxb2-HiktX92zOx7kfIdfAcmAgb7b5gLvdV8wLVkAOoKSAE7IAVfGMV3V5OmWueCaUlOfkYhi2jEEFqliQ8Q3bfm8a2ntqN9gGe8zf4xo76rA1naM-9i3FtBkb7NAF04YOE6ZojMUULDU2OGobNF3o1vRghoQHkzDSQ0gbig3aFPs_dopoUotduiRn3jQDXv3eJfl4uH9fPWUvr4_Pq7uXzHImU-YtClWZQirPRV35TyVsJZzhrmA1oKhr7koQwksolfQemKxLbqXlYFmpgC9JOXNt7Ichote7GFoTRw1MH_XprZ716aM-PeubardzDadt-4BRDzZgZycDcfpIuz78D_gBRtR-Gg</recordid><startdate>20210715</startdate><enddate>20210715</enddate><creator>Tong, Jiaxin</creator><creator>Zhu, Zhiping</creator><creator>Yang, Yusi</creator><creator>Jiang, Yuankang</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210715</creationdate><title>Removal of chemical oxygen demand from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid cleaning wastewater with electrochemical treatment</title><author>Tong, Jiaxin ; Zhu, Zhiping ; Yang, Yusi ; Jiang, Yuankang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-fce587a268f3597fb85c75da3d2091e5993d4155f61486ff106943c6c31c04813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Central composite design</topic><topic>COD</topic><topic>EDTA cleaning wastewater</topic><topic>Electrochemical treatment</topic><topic>Single-factor experiment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tong, Jiaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Zhiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yusi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yuankang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Separation and purification technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tong, Jiaxin</au><au>Zhu, Zhiping</au><au>Yang, Yusi</au><au>Jiang, Yuankang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Removal of chemical oxygen demand from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid cleaning wastewater with electrochemical treatment</atitle><jtitle>Separation and purification technology</jtitle><date>2021-07-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>267</volume><spage>118651</spage><pages>118651-</pages><artnum>118651</artnum><issn>1383-5866</issn><eissn>1873-3794</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •The COD removal efficiency can get 94.63% by electrochemical treatment.•Externally adding H2O2 combined electro-coagulation and electro-peroxidation.•Established a model using a central composite design to check the effects of parameters.•The relationships among parameters affecting removal efficiency were proposed.•Analyzed and deduced the EDTA degradation mechanism. Removing chemical oxygen demand (COD) from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) cleaning wastewater is difficult. In this study, an electrochemical treatment device was designed to condition EDTA cleaning wastewater, which mainly consisted of direct current (DC) power supply, iron anode, aluminum cathode, and magnetic stirrer. Four parameters, namely, initial pH, inter-electrode distance, current density, and H2O2 concentration, were investigated. The best COD removal efficiency of 86.31% in single-factor experiments was obtained at initial pH of 5, inter-electrode distance of 2 cm, current density of 60 A/m2, and H2O2 concentration of 30 mmol/L. On the basis of single-factor experimental results, a model with a methodological strategy was established using a central composite design to check these factors and their effects. The model described the changes of COD removal efficiency according to the same four parameters. The ranges for the initial pH, inter-electrode distance, current density, and H2O2 concentration are 3–5, 1–3 cm, 40–60 A/m2, and 20–40 mmol/L, respectively. The optimum conditions could be obtained from the model, which are 4.4, 1.5 cm, 52.8 A/m2 and 38.0 mmol/L, whose COD removal efficiency was 94.63%, and relative importance of parameters was in the order: current density &gt; H2O2 concentration &gt; initial pH &gt; inter-electrode distance. FTIR and MS were performed to indent the intermediate products formed during this process and XRD was performed to indent the precipitates, a possible degradation pathway and mechanism of EDTA were proposed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118651</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1383-5866
ispartof Separation and purification technology, 2021-07, Vol.267, p.118651, Article 118651
issn 1383-5866
1873-3794
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_seppur_2021_118651
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Central composite design
COD
EDTA cleaning wastewater
Electrochemical treatment
Single-factor experiment
title Removal of chemical oxygen demand from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid cleaning wastewater with electrochemical treatment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A10%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Removal%20of%20chemical%20oxygen%20demand%20from%20ethylenediaminetetraacetic%20acid%20cleaning%20wastewater%20with%20electrochemical%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Separation%20and%20purification%20technology&rft.au=Tong,%20Jiaxin&rft.date=2021-07-15&rft.volume=267&rft.spage=118651&rft.pages=118651-&rft.artnum=118651&rft.issn=1383-5866&rft.eissn=1873-3794&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118651&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES1383586621003634%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-fce587a268f3597fb85c75da3d2091e5993d4155f61486ff106943c6c31c04813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true