Loading…

The preoccupied parent

We examine the hypothesis that low parental investments in children may be a consequence of the adverse cognitive effects of poverty: financial worries preoccupy low-income parents with immediate concerns, shifting their attention away from stimulating parenting tasks. We test this hypothesis in an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of behavioral and experimental economics 2023-08, Vol.105, p.102030, Article 102030
Main Authors: Burlacu, Sergiu, Mani, Anandi, Ronzani, Piero, Savadori, Lucia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We examine the hypothesis that low parental investments in children may be a consequence of the adverse cognitive effects of poverty: financial worries preoccupy low-income parents with immediate concerns, shifting their attention away from stimulating parenting tasks. We test this hypothesis in an online experiment studying the purchase decisions of UK parents, including their responsiveness to financial subsidies for child development products. Both low and higher-income parents respond to a subsidy on such products, increasing their demands. However, when primed with financial worries under the same budget, low-income parents respond less to the subsidy, prioritizing instead the purchase of products addressing immediate household needs. This lower responsiveness to subsidies appears to be driven by worried parents further away from their last payday. Stronger safety nets and better alignment of financial subsidies to payday cycles may help achieve more investment and better child outcomes in poorer families. •We examine if low parental investments is due to the cognitive effects of poverty.•We propose a novel, incentive-compatible, budget allocation task.•We randomly trigger financial worries and offer a subsidy on child investment goods.•When financial worries are less salient, low-income parents respond to the subsidy.•Financial worries hinder low-income parents’ response to child investment subsidies.•The effect appears driven by low-income parents farther from their last payday.•Subsidies accounting for payday cycles may enhance parental investments.
ISSN:2214-8043
2214-8051
DOI:10.1016/j.socec.2023.102030